POLANDA : - powered by PolishForums Classifieds [68] Off-Topic [220]
45,620    

Off-Topicpage 1520 of 1521

Random Chat



Rich Mazur
17 Jul 2019  #45,571

You want a lesson? Here it is. I will go slow so you can keep up.
When the question is who is the fastest man on earth, we let them run and we measure. Objectively. We don't go into sob stories, genetics, fossils, who was oppressed and how. We use what we call a stopwatch and a fake gun to let them know when to start running. Got it so far?

The fastest man running 100 meters dash will reach the finish line first. Still with me? As each crosses the finish line, his time is recorded. Then, all results are tabulated and compared. Now, here is the thing: the guy who registered the SHORTEST time - usually expressed in seconds - is declared the winner. The best. The fastest.

I hope I haven't lost you.
The race between the races can be measured, too. For example, by the number of inventions and patents, the number of life saving medical procedures, the number of life saving drugs, the number of world-class universities and the engineering schools, the number of satellites, the number of world-class chess players, the number of hydrogen bombs and the ICBM's, or any number (not adjectives) you can attach to a specific race. Are you still OK?

BTW, theft and transplanting white wealth from the US to China since 1973 does not count. So, if you want to throw China into the mix, skip anything after the American stupidity - started by Nixon - helped the Chinese thieves get to where they are now at our expense.

Dirk diggler
17 Jul 2019  #45,572

That was probably (I am guessing) when such research was not hate speech.

Actually it was in the 90s.

Whites raping whites is not news, so doesn't get reported as much, or repeated in "shock horror".

That'd because like terrorism, murder, etc it rarely happens. It is fact that the majority of rapes in Swedistan occur between a foreign male and a swedish woman - even the BBC wrote about it. It's no different in Germany which averages several dozen rapes a day - 6k a year the majority of which are between a foreign turd worlder and a native European. It appears even Muslims don't want to have sex with moustached ninja women.

Unless you have evidence, and justification.

There is mounds of evidence proving that darkies commit a disproportionate amount of crime versus whites.

TheOther
17 Jul 2019  #45,573

The race between the races can be measured, too. For example

How do you explain that the Sumerians invented the first written language or the number system for example? That the Chinese came up with paper, rockets, gun powder and porcelain? Many of these inventions were made when white Europeans were still living in caves. Forget your white supremacy nonsense. In only exists in your head.

transplanting white wealth from the US to China

Another BS slogan. Did anyone force American corporations to move production lines to China? Did anyone force American consumers to buy products "Made in China"?

Rich Mazur
17 Jul 2019  #45,574

Three more indicators of white superiority. (1) Migration - toward the white countries, not in the opposite direction. (2) Higher education - the rich send their kids to the white universities in the white countries. (3) Medical treatment - the rich go to the white hospitals in the white countries.

Why is that so? Hmm...

Dirk diggler
17 Jul 2019  #45,575

That the Chinese came up with paper, rockets, gun powder and porcelain? Forget the white supremacy nonsense.

East Asians and whites are by far the most developed. However it was white Europeans that created nearly everything used in the modern world - phones, computers, planes, cars, etc with most of the remaining stuff made by e asians.

That is why European made societies are the most desirable to live in - even for e asians.

Fact remains while Europeans were building palaces, basilicas, ocean going ships, canons, printing presses, etc. Africans were building huts with straw, mud and dung. And to this day most subsaharans live without even indoor plumbing.

TheOther
17 Jul 2019  #45,576

@Dirk

We were talking about white supremacy, and the simple examples I gave are proof that whites are by no means intellectually superior. More ruthless maybe, if you think about events like the Conquista or colonialism in general. That alone gave Europe a head start that no exploited continent could ever catch up with. At least until very recently.

Bobko
17 Jul 2019  #45,577

Three more indicators of white superiority.

Here's some indicators for you:

1. According to the UN, of the world's 30 largest cities 21 are in Asia

2. By next year, Asia will become home to half of the world's middle class, defined as those living in households with daily per capita incomes of between $10 and $100 at 2005 purchasing power parity.

3. Since 2007, Asians have been buying more cars and trucks than people in any other region, and by 2030 its forecasted to buy more automobiles than the rest of the world combined.

4. Next year, for the first time since the 19th century, Asian economies will be larger than the rest of the world combined - according to Unctad, the UN trade and development body.

5. Thailand has a bigger economy than Poland, and Kazakhstan's is larger than the Czech Republic's.

OK. In 1500, was Asia superior to Europe? Yes or no

Yes

Lyzko
17 Jul 2019  #45,578

From a technology perspective, it still is:-)

Dirk diggler
17 Jul 2019  #45,579

Many of these inventions were made when white Europeans were still living in caves.

It is proven that white iq is higher than that of blacks and Latinos but slightly lower than e asians. Even the American psychology association confirmed it.

if you think about events like the Conquista or colonialism in general. That alone gave Europe a head start that no exploited continent

If they were more advanced than Europeans they would have been conquering and colonizing us, not the other way around. They fought with sticks and bows and arrows since they were advanced enough or smart enough to develop things like guns, cannons, etc.

Yes

Really? Is that why Europeans were conquering their lands and forming colonies in places like phillipines, India, Japan, etc?

Dirk diggler
17 Jul 2019  #45,580

From a technology perspective, it still is:-)

That's because their brightest minds are developing robots, rockets, machines of all sorts while our brightest minds are creating fake penises for transformers out of forearms.

Like tue example I gave earlier - the United Kaliphate gave a girl an award for making a chair that literally busts balls for men and while tue female version allows them to sit like a trucker.

You think such crap would even cross the mind of an Asian engineer or inventor? Of course not. And instead of giving awards for such a stupid "invention" they'd probably throw the person in some reeducation camp.

I'm starting to love the Chinese more and more.

Bobko
17 Jul 2019  #45,581

If they were more advanced than Europeans they would have been conquering and colonizing us

Lets give the natives of the Americas a break. They were disconnected from the rest of humanity for more than ten thousand years (or whenever the bering strait stopped being crossable by land). It's not clear where Europe or Asia would have been had it been completely surrounded by ocean.

But why amongst the rest of the world's regions, Europe came to be the first to colonize the New World - this is purely an accident of geography. The countries with coast lines along the Atlantic had (1) a whole lot less enemies to worry about (2) a sailing/fishing tradition (3) the shortest route (4) favorable winds and currents

Edit: Imagine colonizing those places you mentioned, Dirk, from the Eastern Mediterranean. This is where the Ottoman Empire was based, the strongest state in Europe both economically and militarily in 1500.

TheOther
17 Jul 2019  #45,582

If they were more advanced than Europeans they would have been conquering and colonizing us

Maybe they weren't so much interested in conquering like the Europeans, but preferred peaceful trading instead? The Chinese and Arabs for example had large trading networks that spanned continents. Besides: I believe that the Europeans were just lucky. Take the Spaniards in South America for example. Without the locals believing that white people are gods, the Spanish conquistadors wouldn't have stood a chance. Same with the first British settlers in America. The natives could've slaughtered them easily.

Dirk diggler
17 Jul 2019  #45,583

The natives could've slaughtered them easily.

Yeah they really posed a threat with their sticks and stones vs guns and cannons. They were so backwards they didn't even know how to smelt bronze let alone iron or steel. They were still literally living in the stone age. And they still would be if it wasn't for Europeans introducing them to modern technology. They thought we were gods because of how backwards they were.

Maybe they weren't so much interested in conquering like the Europeans, but preferred peaceful trading instead?

B.s. they fought local wars constantly especially Japan and China. in fact many didn't want to trade and wanted to be isolated, until the Europeans forced them.

Bobko
17 Jul 2019  #45,584

Really? Is that why Europeans were conquering their lands and forming colonies in places like phillipines, India, Japan, etc?

wtf dude. use google, or something...

you're off by centuries.

Dirk diggler
18 Jul 2019  #45,585

wtf dude. use google, or something...

I recommend you do before you that before you criticize me. The first wave of colonization took place in the late 1400s early 1500s.

Asians didn't even have ocean going vessels then let alone colonies across the ocean

johnny reb
18 Jul 2019  #45,586

and by 2030 its forecasted to buy more automobiles than the rest of the world combined.

Except for the fact they don't have the infrastructure to support that.
They are bumper to bumper now on their roads.
Have you seen a picture of their traffic congestion lately.

Bobko
18 Jul 2019  #45,587

The first wave of colonization took place in the late 1400s early 1500s

Nothing happened in the 1400s, and nothing happened in the early 1500s. Portuguese India cannot be considered a colonization, and in any case only started taking shape in the 1530s and remained tiny, while the Spanish colonization of the Phillippines did not happen until the second half of the 1500s. In the case of Japan nothing ever happened except for trade contacts. Don't know if you count china under the "etc" but there definitely nothing happened, and actually China had been trying to "colonize" those areas you're talking about itself, except it was much earlier to the game.

edit:

Asians didn't even have ocean going vessels then let alone colonies across the ocean

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zheng_He

Ironside
18 Jul 2019  #45,588

a court in Wroclaw just sentenced a guy

?If that was over some comments online. That very sad and shouldn't have happened. Unless he was very obsessive and were posting same old some old all the time like Dirk and Rich. In that case he should be charged for being annoying a''hole and for pollution.

This forum is definitely bordering on illegality

Down with the police state and it lackeys.

Dirk diggler
18 Jul 2019  #45,589

@Bobko

More than anything the Asians did across the ocean at that time.

Unless he was very obsessive and were posting same old some old all the time like Dirk and Rich.

Says the guy with 9k posts....

Rich Mazur
18 Jul 2019  #45,590

1. According to the UN, of the world's 30 largest cities 21 are in Asia

According to me, yours is the stupidest post on the subject and the most irrelevant. Read my 125 and bang your head on the wall. Maybe that will help you understand the contents of what I wrote.

What the f*** does the size of some city have to do with where you run for your life when you get cancer, genius? Or where you want your kids to get the best education, or where millions want to move to - illegally if necessary? All in the white countries! Just look which way the rats are running and you know instantly which race is superior.

But India has most cows. Holy f***!

Says the guy with 9k posts....

...and nothing to say other than feeding off others.

johnny reb
18 Jul 2019  #45,591

Says the guy with 9k posts....

Fck Dirk, you came here in 17, Rich in 18 and me in 14.
Last month on June 17th I had 3389 post and a mouth later, today, I still have 3389 posts.
My posts get DELETED on a daily bases by a very disgruntled Mod.
Hell both you guys have as many posts as I do and I have been here 3 & 4 years longer then you guys.
Well f the person responsible for doing it.
They must not like my posts. lol

Rich Mazur
18 Jul 2019  #45,592

I think the explanation is simpler because I noticed the disappearing post syndrome, too, when I was about celebrate my 2000. They just truncate the threads that grew too long and the post count goes down when they do it. Mine did for the same reason.

They have no reason to hate you and, if they did, they would do something else rather than messing around with your post count. Just saying...

Rich Mazur
18 Jul 2019  #45,593

Hey, AOC, you are dumb like a rock but don't feel bad 'cause you are in a good company. This time it's actually a royalty. Hard to be believe THAT, isn't it?

From climatedepot.com:

The Prince of Wales has warned global leaders that if we don't tackle climate change in 18 months the human race will go extinct in a speech in London yesterday to foreign ministers from the Commonwealth.

Chuck, go for walk without an escort and tell us if global warming is really at the top of your royal list. If it is, you are as stupid as we knew you were from your previous predictions that expired without as much as "I kind of fu**ed up" from you.

BTW, what AI did you use to arrive at 18? Why not 16? Or 12? Giving yourself more room not to look like another gw loon?

Joker
18 Jul 2019  #45,594

The Prince of Wales has warned global leaders t

Is this Prince of Wales a scientist? Im tired of these armchair climatologists predicting world doom. He sounds like AOC, but at least she gave us 12 years:)

Im sure he has data to back it up! lol

Whats even funnier...Its 2019 and England still has Royals! And the subjects have to pay tax to this wretched old hag.

Rich Mazur
18 Jul 2019  #45,595

.Its 2019 and England still has Royals!

The French have other problems but they were right in the royalty department. The Brits are funny with their attachment to nonsense. I read somewhere way back that after they lost all their colonies, they still continued with their Ministry of Colonies or some other such stuff.

My best advice for the P of W is just shut up. You became an embarrassment to the 10-buck future tellers with bad English accent and uncertain origin.

TheOther
18 Jul 2019  #45,596

Prince of Wales

Trump's "Prince of Whales"? LOL!

Rich Mazur
18 Jul 2019  #45,597

It's better to misspell the name of some obscure place nobody knows and cares about than to make an a-hole out of yourself the way the "prince" managed so far.

Joker
18 Jul 2019  #45,598

English accent and uncertain origin.

Ive heard these Royals are really from German ancestory and not English, its one of the longest scams in history!

Can you imagine being the Queen and seeing your city turning into Londionstan and not saying a word?

Yet, the money keeps rolling into her coffers to keep the Royal morons galavanting around the world and shooting their mouths off.

Pompous, is the perfect definition for Brits:)

@ Kangaroo bOY

do you have spellcheck?

Pretty sad, when all you can comment on is a typo,,,duh!

Rich Mazur
18 Jul 2019  #45,599

He is just taking a cheap shot at Trump.
That Queen is a joke that I just don't get. The country is going to down to hell and her problem is which of the two useless bimbos is nicer to her and how they stand at some goofy parade.

Joker
18 Jul 2019  #45,600

He is just taking a cheap shot at Trump.

Well, that's all Libs are basically are capable of doing at this point in time. He probably just finished watching CNN and is in full TDS mode.

The country is going to down to hell and her problem is which of the two useless bimbos

What is even more confusing, the Brits keep handing these Royal morons boat loads of money to continue embarrassing themselves?

Remember this song? The best version of God Save the Queen. Im surprised she didn't Knight them like Sir, Eltomo

youtu.be/02D2T3wGCYg


PreviousNext
What medication would you take if you had HIV-Aids? Curious? [11]Tour agencies from Poland interested in Serbia [30]


Off-Topic / Random Chattop