17 Oct 2019 #48,451
How do you carry the interesting dialog if you are the sole participant?
Being sole participant doesn't bother me since nobody is obligated to read and join. What pisses the fu*ck out of me is when some a-hole here throws sh*it like "Trump insults the Constitution" on the wall and refuses to provide the specifics when asked! A classic hit-and-run argument.
Another version of the same: I write three well edited and logical paragraphs. A moron responds with "You are stupid". That's it. Fu*ck, even my dog - if I had one - would do better. Like "You are stupid because...." If you are (editorial) too fu*cking lazy to elaborate, then just STFU.
The third variety of morons will always ignore the contents and come back with some a-hole comment about my connections with Russia. Like I would be ashamed to be a Russian.
That's why I hate that damn timer. The fact that nobody gives a damn what and how I do it does not help.
That sentence of mine you quoted is not what I meant. I didn't complain that nobody reads my posts. I really don't care. I meant to say that even if I am the only one who knows I screwed up editing, it still does not offer any relief. I am that anal in this respect.