POLANDA : - powered by PolishForums   Classifieds [75] Off-Topic [334]
82    

Off-Topicpage 2 of 3

I want a member banned, or else...



Dougpol1
29 May 2016  #31

IF you know who the troll is, you may go after him/her

We know who it is.

If PF do not ban him, they open themselves to action too.

Dougpol1
29 May 2016  #32

But have you provided the proof it was him?

The evidence:

1. The original AOL was out of New Jersey. /the digital trail.

2. Johnny and Porky have taken issue with me on various docmented points/ The motive/context

3.The consistent way of stating/writing

4. The non-denial in Off-topic/gloating.

I think - off the top of my head - I would stand a very good chance of a non harassment order actually:)

And I'm asking PF to pre-empt this.

Of course, if Porky is allowed back - then we KNOW for FACT that PF is scum. And I will try to fight that because he is attacking my personal business by FALSE representation.

Would you let that go?

peterweg
29 May 2016  #33

This man has interfered with my workplace - when not a valid opinion - and the source is linked to PF - not to my work performance. A personal attack.

Not from PF.

I think - off the top of my head - I would stand a very good chance of a non harassment order actually:

Not against PF.

Dougpol1
29 May 2016  #34

he /Porky/ was suspended for a week

So admin - as you are not responding, I will be instructing my lawyer tomorrow to contact you with a first letter of notification as to possible action.
You can stop this at any time by permanently banning the user as above, but that is your prerogative.

Not against PF.

Good place to start though. They have details of the user - who must comply with site regulations.

dolnoslask
29 May 2016  #35

"Dolno said there are some weird people here. I am one of them," No you are not Dougpo there are only two nutters on PF.

Dougpo is Dougpo, He has his views, but I Have not seen him bullying others or hounding them off the forum , he speaks as an individual , and does not instigate the bullying , understandably he has his own views which at times do not always coincide with others including my own, but it is wrong for people to attack his livelihood and his family because of that.

johnny reb
29 May 2016  #36

You've been drinking haven't you.
to contact you with a first letter of notification

Gees Doug, that will cost you a days wages right there if not more.
If PF do not ban him, they open themselves to action too.

No they don't, but if it makes you feel better convincing yourself of that then it is your story. (sigh)
I think - off the top of my head -

Now there's the problem, you don't even have a hair on the top of your head so how do you expect to think off it when there is nothing there.
a non harassment order

Wouldn't that be an order of not being harassed ?
You are nothing but harassment Douglas.
Now just go and do what you got to do as you've got more then your share of attention today.
Don't make me open another bag of popcorn.

Wulkan
29 May 2016  #37

1. 2. 3. 4.

All 4 are just assumptions with no hard evidence whatsoever.

Mr Wiech
29 May 2016  #38

No.

I have read it all and I feel sorry for you it was siwństwo. I can give you an advice for free. You haven't got a case against Polish Forums not in Poland, and they say this is an American forum its would made it harder, more expensive, you would need to hire an American lawyer.
Ask your lawyer but you need to go to AOL website with subpoena to get this mail address IP, only after you have his ID proven you can sue him.

peterweg
29 May 2016  #39

Good place to start though. They have details of the user - who must comply with site regulations.

A fundermental principle for you: Person A is not responsible for the actions of Person B, even if Person A makes it *possible* for Person B to perform those actions.

dolnoslask
29 May 2016  #40

"but you need to go to AOL website with subpoena to get this mail address IP, only after you have his ID proven you can sue him."

Very true anyone can send an email spoofing someones email address.

johnny reb
29 May 2016  #41

only after you have his ID proven you can sue him.

delph is going to be devastated as he was looking for this windfall to start up his landscape business.

Dougpol1
29 May 2016  #42

Don't you ever threaten me again

But I have your original PM which would be seen as a threat of exposure in the context that we are talking about Johnny. So you are not that bright.

It's cybercrime people, and I would ask the admin to read through ALL the thread OT, including PMs, very carefully indeed.

Admin:

If you choose not to ban the user known as Porky indefinitely, then I will absolutely act against you if at all possible in the law to obtain his details.

That is a promise and not a threat.

Reported you to Admin Johnny.

Keep it up. You will get a ban yet.

A fundermental principle for you: Person A is not responsible for the actions of Person B, even if Person A makes it *possible* for Person B to perform those actions.

You forget: I know who the offender is. Meaning - their name, their business, their address. And the person can be linked to the online posting.

Again - are you sure of that? Where do you get that from? On a registered forum, the forum can be held responsible (under UK law at least)
It's a starter for 10. I know you're trying to contribute to the debate, but it all sounds so depressing. So One has to take it to the opposition as a matter of course:)

By the way Admin - I will be bumping this post until you assure us, the posters, of what you want:

Because this today and yesterday is a scandal of the first order- and please don't make the mistake of thinking it is going to go away;

The stark choice:

A forum free of illegal action, such as making obvious references to people's identity online, naming them by surname - stating their initials and their business, - insinuating, and by nature threatening them to stop stating their views.... (and this includes ALL camps)

OR

A Guardian style website:

Where I can tell them to go and do one.

What is it to be?

If it is the first - and you don't act by banning them, permanently, specifically the user known as /Porky, I will pursue them through your server data if at all possible. And whatever other users state, I believe you will be held responsible if you refuse to co0operate with the authorities.

Nah:

Bump

Tell us what you want admin. I demand answers.

We don't give a hoot how you pronounce Polish surnames. What are you going to do about this site? Is it going to die or are you going to play straight?

POLL:

Who wants the poster known as PORKY back?

If a majority of 20 voters want him back, then so be it - and I will pursue him as I see fit, but will not comment on it here.

Wulkan
30 May 2016  #43

I'm genuinely worried about Doug now, the blood pressure in his head makes him to talk to himself. Look at that one:

We don't give a hoot how you pronounce Polish surnames.


Dougpol1
30 May 2016  #44

I'm genuinely worried about Doug now

Lol. Be worried about this forum:)

Mr Forbes
30 May 2016  #45

Mr Dougpol1 I am new here but are you ok?where are you from? Are you on some kind of drugs?

Possibly banned member registered again - the original account's ban is now extended to 30 days. Another attempt to post from a banned account will extend the suspension period again. It's not allowed to have more than 1 registered account.

Update - upon further investigation, it appears this member has actually created 3 different membership accounts, which means at least 6+ month suspension.


Dougpol1
30 May 2016  #46

I repeat MODS

This poster aka Porky posted this message to my workplace yesterday:

Welcome heartily.
Before the moment of your account appeared weak opinion from the user Beata.
Below is the full text:

I do not recommend this teacher. Not organized, arrogant. In addition, it is a person with a very anti-Polish poglondach, outright xenophobic.

Remember to add the possibility of response to any opinion they receive. To do this, click on the following link:

See opinion »

and respond to the selected comment.

Best Regards,

I have flagged it and if it turns out to be a New Jersey ISP I think that is proof don't you?

I will know more tomorrow and will petition the website in question to offer what limited info they can to my lawyer. but we know the answer, even if it was a proxy..

If that is not worthy of a permanent ban - then PF is a laughing stock, and no more. It means we are all free to wage personal vendettas and I can work to destroy a certain person's business, and follow another person around, and rubbish his work.

Which clearly is not the case.

So are you going to act, or NOT?

Wulkan
30 May 2016  #47

I couldn't care less about this forum. It'd prolly be better if it was down, there would be a bit less bigotry and polonophobia online so basically, too bad you're just incapable clown who can't do nothing.

delphiandomine
30 May 2016  #48

This poster aka Porky

He's re-registered already. So much for being banned...

Dougpol1
30 May 2016  #49

I am new here

Laugh all you want. When the police are banging on your door you will poop in your pants (again) weirdo.

MODS: Ban this user aka Porky, or it may count against you

Wulkan
30 May 2016  #50

He's re-registered already. So much for being banned...

Yes edited, he must have learnt those tricks from you when you had the longest ban in this forum's history.

Dougpol1
30 May 2016  #51

who can't do nothing.

We will soon see about that now won't we.

Wulkan
30 May 2016  #52

I'll take your word :-)

Mr Forbes
30 May 2016  #53

Police on my doors? Why guys?what did I do? Are you guys haunted by someone or something ?

Wulkan
30 May 2016  #54

edited

Pfff...hahahahaha........ oh god! this is one of the funniest days on this forum ever

johnny reb
30 May 2016  #55

But I have your original PM which would be seen as a threat of exposure in the context that we are talking about Johnny. So you are not that bright.

I know cry baby, post my post for everyone to see why don't you.
You have my permission even though you don't need it.
You have gone off the deep end Douglas.
Either you have some serious mental issues or you are drunk or both.
which would be seen as a threat of exposure in the context

By who ? Only you.
Post it, I dare you to post it for everyone to see. I double dare you just to show what a liar you are.
Bawk bawk bawk goes the chicken Douglas.
He's re-registered already.

Finally

gumishu
30 May 2016  #56

You start sounding like InPolska before she committed "cyber suicide" on this forum

what did InPolska do Wulkan - I am not here everyday so I missed it

Mr Wiech
30 May 2016  #57

Which clearly is not the case.

You clearly don't understand that if something have been posted on another website Polish Forum it has nothing to do with it.

RubasznyRumcajs
30 May 2016  #58

Oh blimey, I wish I'd have coke and popcorn!

Harry
30 May 2016  #59

Possibly banned member registered again - the original account's ban is now extended to 30 days.

For the whole time that that user was posting here under the Porky username he was banned under the "pigsy" username. action=userinfo&user=51938

Ziemowit
30 May 2016  #60

what did InPolska do Wulkan

She did nothing wrong, gumishu, except being a charming French lady to everyone and in particular to Atch and rozumiemnic.

blimey, I wish I'd have coke and popcorn!

Dough has coke, but he has no popcorn and that's his problem really ...


PreviousNext
MODS: Can you provide concrete examples of violations? [3]The last ten incidents of aviation [2]


Off-Topic / I want a member banned, or else...top