Poland Minister for civil society / equal rights: "law shouldn't stop businesses turning away black customers"

I really am struggling to understand what the PIS lovers are doing. Are they having a competition to see who can say the stupidest thing? Or are they trying to say stupid things simply because they want to distract attention from how they're driving Poland into the mire?


Full article here: inside-poland/t/polands-equalities-tsar-says-law-shouldnt-stop-businesses-turning-away-black-customers/

Clearly this moron needs to read the constitution of Poland and pay attention to article 32.2:


Or is allowing businesses to practise apartheid one of the good changes The Dear Leader Chairman Kaczynski has been promising us?

What are you talking about? Some kind of PiS bashing again? Maybe it is about the right of the owner to refuse to serve ...whomever they want?

@Harry. Stunning, I am gobsmacked.

Disgusting, isn't it?

Just shows how desperately out of touch these people are - they're all the children of nomeklatura pretending not to be.

With PIS, as with other far right groups there is often an ulterior motive - and most of the PIS cabinet have made a career out of intrigue. But yes, they are actually that stupid.

A new low. Yet another new low...

or maybe ,you dont,could or are unable to understand,what he said...

Then explain it .

This is an old libertarian talking point - economic activity should be completely voluntary on both sides and the coercive power of the state should not force people to deal with people against their will.

It's a defensible position but it's hard to discuss rationally as even otherwise sensible people get all jittery inside.

Isn't it his entire job to do precisely that? it looks like he is incompetent.

I'm not interested in defending Kaczmarczyk. I'm just saying that whatever it is that he said (until and unless I read his remarks in the original language).

I'm just saying that in the idea of freedom of economic association for private individuals is not apartheid and portraying it as such does not help the cause of rational debate.


should read: "defending Kaczmarczyk and/or whatever it is that he said"

He said it shouldn't so perhaps PiS is planning to change constitution in this regard.