[Moved from]:
Prime example how blatant Vatican`s propaganda of Vatican News perverts words of Pope John Paul IIIt is well known that Pope John Paul II had a negative stance on the events in Srebrenica during Civil War in former Yugoslavia. Although, one sided and incomplete stance.
Pope spoke of `massacre` of Bosnian Serb forces on local Muslims but, he never mentioned crimes of local Muslims side by side with worse Arab mujaheediones and with sponsorship of EU and NATO, on local Srebrenica Serbs. Anyway, Pope was right to use word `massacre` because in its final extent its what it was. A number of Muslim captives was executed without trial by Bosnian Serb forces. Victims were captured fighters. In case of Muslim crimes on local Serbs, victims were man, woman and children. So that is that real genocide that happened in Srebrenica. Genocide on around 3000 Serbian civilians.
But spot now how Vatican news of our time manipulate. In their article they bringing title >
Srebrenica genocide: "A failure of civilization" - Pope St. John Paul IIsource > vaticannews.va/en/church/news/2020-07/srebrenica-massacre-a-defeat-of-civilization.html
No, Pope John Paul II never said that Serbs committed genocide in Srebrenica. He said `massacre`. Its the difference. Same stance have leading experts on genocide crimes. Genocide on Muslims didn`t happen. War crime on them did happen.
So, I here want to tell you a fact. Vatican News, official voice of Vatican as the head of Catholic Church openly lie when using name of Pope John Paul II.
That`s one fact. Now second. Pope John Paul II wasn`t qualified to be declared a Saint if he failed to mention that real genocide in Srebrenica happened on local Serbians. Lat`s face it, Pope John Paul II was capable to tell truth only partially and he insulted Serbians (Racowie).