Random Chat 3

Why would anyone comment?

Ena Sharples might, I suppose...

Dude, it's jon357 who started chastising pawian for his behaviour towards Ptak :)) He's also chastising other people for all kinds of stuff. So I find it curious, hypocritical (and disturbing) that somehow he isn't bothered by Strzelec35's behaviour.


So jon357 and Strzelec35 are friends now? :D

Btw, do you usually make friends with people as disturbed as Strzelec35? Just curious...


But jon357 is doing that to pawian and you don't find it strange? :)))


For the same reason you comment on pawian's behaviour?

I don't think Jon would have said anything, had it not been so wildly out of character for Pawian. I think it's genuine concern.

No, I replied to some particularly egregious trolling, flaming and abuse from a poster who appeared late at night and was spoiling for an online spat, rather pointlessly.


When someone starts flaming and abuse towards me, yes.

Just admit you're wrong here instead of trying to perpetuate a nothing.

@Bobko, I think Strzelec35's behaviour is far more concerning and worrying.


Egregious trolling, flaming and abuse is a "norm" for Strzelec35. So why you never reply to that?


Pawian wasn't abusing you though, but Ptak. So why did you react, but you never react in a negative way to the crap that Strzelec35 is writing? I'm just curious.


Wrong about what?

So you can't post about one thing without posting about another. Interesting.

Anyway, isn't Strzelec banned?

A whiff of the hair net here...

God is the greatest, Death to America, Death to Israel, Curse on the Jews, Victory to Islam!

Is it?

He seems to be blissfully unaware of his "trolling". He doesn't "flame" either, no matter how many times I dip his face in his own vomit. Always very polite.

The "abuse" he perpetrates, is an abuse of the forum and civilized sensibilities. Don't think I saw him abusing anyone here intentionally.

In other words, he's an idiot. Not quite what you make him out to be.

Why don't you answear my question? Strzelec35's behaviour doesn't bother you in any way? I'm asking about this, because normal people are bothered by his behaviour. That's why your attitude towards him always puzzled me and I found it disturbing. I've been wondering what is wrong with you...

And now, when I see how easy it was for you to call pawian "scum", etc. while you never called out Strzelec35 for anything... Literally anything... I find your attitude even more puzzling... What is that all about?


It's not really about Strzelec35 or even pawian... It's about you right now. I'm trying to figure out what kind person you are... Because I remember how you were defending child rapists... So I feel disturbed for a reason and I'm asking about all of this for a reason. It's not a joking matter for me.


Seriously? You've seen very little of what he posted here then.

Why would I? And no, his "behaviour" doesn't "bother" me. Do you get "bothered" by the off-forum "behaviour" of people who post here?


Why?


No you don't, because I most certainly wasn't.

It's a very good thing you're not allowed inside a court room.

Wow...


I meant his behaviour in general, both on and off the forum.


Yes, you were. It was about some doctor or hospital director for kids with cancer, as far as I remember, who was sexually abusing dying kids and you claimed his victims lied. You claimed the same thing about some celebrity (I don't remember his name) - I remember rozumiemnic calling you out for this.

Your behaviour was pretty disgusting.


Because I like to know whom I'm dealing with.

So, thanks for showing your true colours, creep.

You are lying.

If China was the "biggest threat" Western "democracies" would not have moved their manufacturing to China, would not be buying things from China, and would not allow thousands of their spies into Western universities to study STEM. BTW, did you notice that they never come to study LGBT civil rights? Funny, isn't it?

I didn't, but never mind actual facts when you have online hysteria instead.


"Claimed"? He was cleared after a Judicial Review by the courts. He had never been to the town where the alleged crime took place and was provably 16,000 km away at the time. But hey, perhaps an innocent verdict isn't enough for you.


Pointing out that a crime that didn't happen didn't actually happen?

It's very good that you aren't in a courtroom. You'd doubtless ignore all evidence and hang anyone in the dock...

Yes, you did. Maybe not all of them, but as far as I remember you were writing stuff like "He wouldn't have time to rape all of those kids, so a number of them must be lying".


I don't remember anything about an innocent verdict. I just remember that rozumiemnic was calling you out for defending some celebrity child abuser. So what was his name?


Don't worry, nobody is taking you to a courtroom, jon357, you can relax lol I'm also not in favour of hanging people.
As for evidence - you have given me enough yourself already.

@Bobko

Watch the movie Eyes Wide Shut or Alex Jones' film Inside Bohemian Grove. Read what it says on the Georgia Guidestones. If you think that the elite, i.e. an important part of it, does not have its own quasi-theology, which they take seriously, you have not done the necessary research.

t.me/DystopianDiscourse/20859

You remember wrong.


You don't need to. It isn't about what you think or what Roz has or hasn't read online.

@Paulina, when was the last time (in real life, not on here) that you apologised to someone you didn't have to apologise to?

...with their gov cronies' blessings that made gov cronies co-guilty since they knew the consequences of this nonsense.
We actually have a gov office that assists and encourages private companies to go foreign. K-Street wh*res are probably fluent in Chinese by now.

Governments can easily prevent private companies from going foreign. They don't because they are corrupt criminals, and they like their bribes and nice jobs for themselves when they get unelected. And, of course, for the "loved ones".

All of them?

I don't think so... It was quite some time ago, so I suppose I could get some details wrong, but I remember that I found your comments about that case disturbing. I don't find people's comments disturbing just like that, for no reason.


So what was this celebrity's name?


Why?

Jon357, you wrote that Strzelec35's behaviour doesn't bother you. And indeed it did look like it didn't bother you. So I was right that I found your behaviour disturbing.

That's enough for me to not want to have anything to do with you. That's all I have to say.

Enough to be a problem to the rest of us.
The result: nothing worth having is made in the US. Even VWs are made in China. Without imports, the US DoD couldn't buy a toilet. Forget about F-35s...

Feel free, however you're certainly posting plenty.

@Paulina, when was the last time (in real life, not on here) that you apologised to someone you didn't have to apologise to?

Where most of their production, as it happens, still is,

You don't need to pointlessly attempt to argue. Nor do you need to get involved in every thread.

I will post as many times as I detect bs or idiotic Poilish metaphors. Or an adjective as a cheap substitute for a number.

@jon357, and I think I'm going to post a bit more:


Jon357, what was that celebrity's name?

Wasn't it Jimmy Savile by any chance?

I think this is probably that roz's comment that I remembered:

polanda.com/off-topic/american-understanding-britain-83918/5/#msg1741859


The same Jimmy Savile that you called "Sir Jimmy" here: 🤮


Btw, any child rapist is a "demon" for me, no matter if he raped 1 child or 100 or 1000.

But do tell, jon357, what was the final, official "count" of Savile's victims?

According to this article from May 2022 it was up to 1000 victims:

city.ac.uk/news-and-events/news/2022/05/jimmy-savile-how-the-netflix-documentary-fails-to-address-the-role-institutions-play-in-abuse

No actually. Although I do strongly believe in Sir Jimmy Savile's innocence.


All that and a hogh profile media career for decades too.

I see you've spent the whole afternoon trawling through archives, even 'polanda'.

isn't that a bit obsessive?

Strange that Paulina has devoted so much time and malign energy (including an hour trawling through 'polanda' archives) in trying to attack me today. She even kept mentioning Strzelec for some reason,

It doesn't worry me one little bit, however it does reflect very poorly on her.

Bush and Blair did a lot, but I am fairly certain that they have never been accused of abducting thousands of Iraqi children.

Because your attitude towards him and his posts is weird.

Or simply not judgemental.

The courts are for judging people. Even someone you disapprove of very much deserves decency. he certainly does.

@Barney
You like to forget that Saddam was killing tens of thousands of his own people, torturing his own people, gassing his own people and he was a known supporter of al-quada who was hiding their members in Iraq. Inconvenient truths I know. The WMD was absolutely incorrect, the end result based on the other items was absolutely just. Like little Vlad he was a POS and deserved to die, he did, and the other will. Giddeeup