You claim something that is completely false (that we don't give warnings for posting abusive words)
If you do not give warnings for posting abusive words, how do you explain the lack of any warnings this user has ?action=userinfo&user=54392 ?
In this post polishforums.com/life/poland-last-bastion-europe-81842/#msg1606249 he calls another poster a "bloody moron", which is both abusive and vulgar, but for some reason the post was not edited, the post was not binned and no warning was given. Would you like to explain why that is, given that you say that stating warnings are not given for posting abusive words "is completely false"?
We can understand that it can be very frustrating for other posters to deal with such dishonest posts
As I've just shown, my post was in no way dishonest: I have linked to a post which is abusive and vulgar for which no warning was given.
You receive a warning for abusing the intellect.
Now that I've demonstrated my statement was completely true, will you be removing that warning?