POLANDA : - powered by PolishForums   Classifieds [75] Off-Topic [334]
3628    

Off-Topicpage 67 of 121

Poland`s aid to Ukraine if Russia invades - part 5



PolAmKrakow
24 Mar 2023  #1981

So sorry to ignore all the Putinazi coxuckers today. Bakhmut is going to be in Russian hands when exactly? All you dumb fvcks riding little Vlads jock will be getting another reality check when they get pushed back again. I wonder why evacuations have begun in Crimea? Must be that the beach season and tourism is about to be all Ukrainian military visitors.

Memo to fvcking retards. Russia invaded in 2014, not 2022. 2022 was an escalation of an already 8 year old war on Ukraine. Now though all the dumb fvcks who love little Vlad cant seem to answer why Russia is still the number one country in the world at dying. Happy gulag retards!

cms neuf
24 Mar 2023  #1982

No it was illegal and unprovoked to invade Iraq.

Just like Muscovy's invasion of Ukraine. Which will fail for the same reason - the Ukrainians don't want to be occupied.

The thing is the US had a 3 week war, followed by 9 years of resistance - Muscovy will never get anywhere near the center of Kyiv.

Novichok
24 Mar 2023  #1983

No it was illegal and unprovoked to invade Iraq.

Therefore, the invaders were "war criminals" - Poland and Polish barbarians included.
Comparing the number of dead civilians in Iraq, Ukraine pales in comparison. So does Katyn.

PolAmKrakow
24 Mar 2023  #1984

@Novichok
I wonder if you would think the Crips coming from the south side to shoot up your house with your family in it would be criminal or not. Not a question, a statement of wonder. Drive by or just stand around out in the street with AK's and firing constantly. Wouldn't matter. I think little Novi might call that criminal. But of course little Vlad doing it isn't criminal. Fvcking hypocrite much? Only mentally unstable and retarded follow this idiot Vlad.

mafketis
24 Mar 2023  #1985

Hey, genius, I meant the 14,000 Russians killed before Feb 2022 b

Hey genius... the 14,000 (all civilians and military on both sides) happened _AFTER_ russia invaded in 2014!

No russian invasion in 2014 then no 14,000 dead people and no "reason" to invade in 2022...

See? russia caused all of this by invading in 2014. All of it.

Now go say irrelevant things about Vietnam and Iraq and fume and cope.

Miloslaw
24 Mar 2023  #1986

Oh come on guys!
Isn't it obvious to everyone that Russia has already lost this war?
And it is about to get a lot worse for the Russians in the coming weeks......

Novichok
24 Mar 2023  #1987

russia invaded in 2014

Russia did not invade Ukraine before 2022. The Russian Navy had a base in Sevastopol with the consent of the Ukrainian government. Duh!

Miloslaw
24 Mar 2023  #1988

@Novichok

On 24 February 2022, Russia invaded and occupied parts of Ukraine in a major escalation of the Russo-Ukrainian War, which began in 2014.

Now please shut up Rich!

Miloslaw
24 Mar 2023  #1989

What part of Ukraine did Russia occupy in the period from 2014 till 2021?

Donetsk and Luhansk.

. I am not afraid of your Ministry of Truth

And I am not afraid of your ministry of lies and ignorance.

Miloslaw
24 Mar 2023  #1990

No games Rich.
Your ignorance surprises me.
Read your history, it was 2014.......

Novichok
24 Mar 2023  #1991

I did.

Quoting:

The Russo-Ukrainian War is an international conflict between Russia and Russian-backed separatists, against Ukraine, which began in February 2014. Following Ukraine's Revolution of Dignity, Russia annexed Crimea from Ukraine and supported pro-Russian separatists fighting the Ukrainian military in the Donbas war.

To Russia hating a-holes here...Russia "annexed" Crimea when Russia realized that Ukraine was going NATO followed by a US flag flying in Sevastopol.

Russia-backed separatists - elsewhere known as "freedom fighters" - are not the same as the Russian army.

Now we know that one illegal act - a 2014 US-funded "revolution" - often begets other illegal acts. As they say, tough sh*it.

Miloslaw
24 Mar 2023  #1992

Russia-backed separatists - elsewhere known as "freedom fighters" - are not the same as the Russian army.

Except that they are all but in name.......
Typical Russian obfuscation.....and you fell for it....or did you?
Or did you really just want to believe these lies?
Either way, you are a fool!

Velund
24 Mar 2023  #1993

The Russian army entered and occupied D and L in 2014?

Rich, they can't admit that for 8 years the Ukrainian "super-soldiers" have been getting their asses torn apart in the manner of the British flag by ordinary miners and teachers... Who took enough weapons and ammunition from the underground Soviet arsenals in the mines near Soledar.

Miloslaw
24 Mar 2023  #1994

Rich, they can't admit that for 8 years the Ukrainian "super-soldiers" have been getting their asses torn apart

Tell that to your Russian compatriots who have been killed and maimed in their thousands........it is a pathetic war of attrition that the Russians will lose.

Hopefully, enough Russians will wake up and be brave enough to cause regime change.

Novichok
24 Mar 2023  #1995

finish british regime that cause so much pain to whole humankind over last centuries...

Now these m-fu*ckers are talking about depleted uranium. Even the US is no longer bragging about it.

They are, all in but name......it works both ways.....

No, stupid. Polish volunteers in Ukraine are not Polish army. If they were the Polish Army, Poland would be officially at war with Russia.

The same applies to US volunteers and advisors.

Miloslaw
24 Mar 2023  #1996

Now these m-fu*ckers are talking about depleted uranium

Guys, please don't be so naive......depleted uranium hurts modern tanks.
End of....

Novichok
25 Mar 2023  #1997

I am fine.Read up.on the uses of depleted uranium and then get back to me.......

Quoting:

Depleted uranium (DU) is a chemotoxic and radiotoxic heavy metal and is classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as a group I carcinogen (limited evidence in humans and sufficient evidence in experimental animals).

The US and UK militaries used DU weapons in Iraq during the First Gulf War in 1991 and the Iraq War starting in 2003.


Thanks, bastards...

And fcuk your article V...

I second the motion.

britain will get something that was not expected.

I am liking that polonium-210 more and more...

mafketis
25 Mar 2023  #1998

a 2014 US-funded "revolution" -

Nope. It was Ukrainian all the way. Were representatives of other countries around trying to influence things? Of course. Did they start it? No. Did they make any big difference? No.

And fcuk your article V...

Fellin' lucky punks? The Baltics are just a waitin' there... go on, fvkk around and find out.....

PolAmKrakow
25 Mar 2023  #1999

I see the Putinazi's do not want to talk about when Bakhmut will be captured. Victory must surely be at hand for little Vlad. Medvedev making statements while on leave from his mental health institution are not to be taken as official.

mafketis
25 Mar 2023  #2000

when Bakhmut will be captured

I'm sure the new narrative will be:

Bakhmut is about to fall! We don't need Bakhmut! We have it surrounded! Bakhmut is of no strategic value!

never look for coherence from fans of Greater Udmurtia...

jon357
25 Mar 2023  #2001

And without long-lived contamination of environment

The purpose of using armour-piercing shells is as their name suggests, to pierce armour. One fired by a Challenger will easily cut through several r*SSian tanks (especially the 1950s ones that they've had to dig out of storage) before it loses momentum.

Stop whining about conspiracy theories involving radiation. Far more radiation was released when the orcs were digging trenches around Chernobyl than is found in all the shells tipped with depleted uranium (depleted is the key word here) that have ever existed.

britain will get something that was not expected

That would of course be the single worst mistrake that r*SSia could ever make in its history.

almost all Falklanders voted in favour of remaining a UK overseas territory.

99.3% Including ALL those with Argentinian nationality. And that election, unlike the spurious plebiscites conducted on occupied territory by r*SSia, was declared to be free and fair by independent international observers. Nor were the islands occupied t the time, and any military stationed there took no part.

There really is no equivalence; stop your pathetic whataboutery.

Korvinus
25 Mar 2023  #2002

So, another counteroffensive soon?
I'd guess towards the southern part, to free up the route to Crimea? Considering Russians are tied up in Bahkmut.

PolAmKrakow
25 Mar 2023  #2003

@Korvinus
Crimea evacuations began last week. It is going to be a disaster there. I think we will see some destruction payback and all the Russian buildings foor the last 9 years a likely to become rubble very soon. And then the bridge will get blown up again. With MIG's and all these tanks on the way, considering all the Orc losses, and low equipment numbers, this is going to be better than last year when they took back so much land.

Meanwhile, little Putinazi fvcks on PF are still in a holding pattern after their wild predictions on Bakhmut from several months ago. Vlad sends his apologies and asks that you buy all the rubles possible to help support the $hit show effort.

Novichok
25 Mar 2023  #2004

independent international observers.

Those independent international observers didn't attempt to conduct a referendum in Crimea, did they? How about the "democratic" Ukrainian government organizing a referendum in Crimea to advance the cause of self-determination and real democracy?

Do you recall any such attempt - similar to the Brexit referendum - in Crimea?

jon357
25 Mar 2023  #2005

a referendum in Crimea

Was there one? No.

Was there a sham r*SSian-organised plebiscite? Yes.

Novichok
25 Mar 2023  #2006

Why didn't Western "democracies" offer to conduct a referendum in Crimea?

jon357
25 Mar 2023  #2007

Crimea

It's illegally occupied by r*SSia.

Hadn't you noticed?

Novichok
25 Mar 2023  #2008

Why didn't Western "democracies" offer to conduct a referendum in Crimea before Russia "illegally occupied" Crimea?

jon357
25 Mar 2023  #2009

See above. It's illegally occupied by r*SSia.

There will be time for referenda when r*SSia has been kicked out (and they're evacuating civilians now because they know what's coming).

Do you genuininely misunderstand everything you read or is it just trolling? You don't need to comment on every thread you know, and you are boring.

Novichok
25 Mar 2023  #2010

Why didn't Western "democracies" offer to conduct a referendum in Crimea before Russia "illegally occupied" Crimea?


PreviousNext
Serbia etc. thread 3 [440]Random Chat 2 [4037]


Off-Topic / Poland`s aid to Ukraine if Russia invades - part 5top