American Political News in relation to Poland

That whole transgender thing reminds me how badly Obama pandered to these extreme lefty groups without any consideration for the majority of the US population.

That goodness hes gone!

Trump doesnt put up with any PC nonsense.......MAGA!

How is that even remotely connected with my Post 570? Since we are having difficulty communicating, I will rephrase my question: When a guy wants to take a dump in a public restroom in a Zoo, where should the girls 5 and 7 he is with be at that time?

If you tell me again that the girls should wait in the men's restroom while he is taking a sh**, you are one of those naive suckers who believes that men are basically good. A guy could be like Mike Tyson and those girls could be snatched in seconds while he is still trying to get that s*** out with his pants down. Do I finally described the situation graphically enough for you? If you choose to respond, skip God, my old age and stick to the subject: where should those girls be at that time.

The whole transgender thing led to one positive outcome. Some places like Target now have family restrooms. The idea that a male guardian must be separated from the kids under his care even for a moment based on gender is too idiotic to discuss. In that sense, Obama and the transgenders did a good thing for the public restrooms. Showers in schools is another matter and is totally moronic to let a guy with the intact plumbing to shower with the girls.

Naw, lets stick to the original one about how you prefer using the woman's restroom instead of the men's just because you can and are hoping for a conflict like you do in every one of your posts here.

You thrive on conflict Dick because you think you are really something.
You want to take your little girls in the women's potty then have at er'.
All I am saying is that if ANY of my women are in there first, no matter what their age is, that YOU will be waiting for them to come out Before YOU go in.

And I am sure if you keep pressing it that you will eventually find someone that feels like I do and welcome your conflict with a one two three lesson.


Bless their hearts as it makes a perfect place to change stinky diapers.


Better yet Dick, how is this even remotely connected to this thread topic ?
Another one of your flaws that seem to continuously get overlooked here.

When a guy wants to take a dump in a public restroom in a Zoo, where should the girls 5 and 7 he is with be at that time?

Lets stick to your original post and quit going off on your "what if " bunny trails just to argue your lost point.


And as I have repeated three times now.


You admitted that you all had to go so what is the difference in taking them into the men's room with you so they can use the stall next to you?

Are you afraid they may hear grandpa's loud noises or are you just less intimidated by using the woman's restroom ?
Your refusing to pay to use the can story at the Polish train station was just about as lame as this one.
Seems that you would have learned by now to sit on the throne BEFORE you leave home.
Either that or get yourself some of those adult diapers old people wear.
In any case, I have never had such issues so like the gospel of Dick would say, Not My Problem.

You do have a problem with your bowls. Hence I don't buy your six-pack story. You're a fatty git.

You don't answer my questions but I will answer yours.
BIG difference. In the men's restroom, the girls, even if locked in the stall next to mine, would be scared more than if they would be in the women's restroom because, from day one, they were told so many times to never talk to strange men; seldom or never, to strange women. So, to them, strange men are danger. Strange women - less so, if at all.

Did you catch this before I go to my next paragraph?

Secondly, with the probability being low but not zero, some pervert can hear them talk and demand that they get out of the stall. They would be terrified and very likely obey the a-hole. What would happen from this point on is a chance I am not willing to take.

Did you finally get it, or are you not capable of comprehending any of this?


You, on the other hand, never go #2. Hence, you are full of s***.
A warning: One day, you will burst.

No, you will if you keep stuffing yourself like you do, fatso!

When I was 20, to stay in my weightlifting class, I was 87.5kg. Today, at 76, this morning, I am 197 lb. That's a gain of 5 pounds in 56 years.

What's in your pants?

No doubt, the seats aren't all splattered up, there isn't urine all over the floor, women flush and there is always soap to wash your hands with.


Oh, so you are deaf too ?


Oh I got it in your first post, you want to justify using the girls restroom even though you have an alternative that most men use which brings us back to the pervert issue.

My hearing is not the issue. Now I am going to scream because the only deaf person here is you.

THE ONLY ISSUE IS HOW THE GIRLS WOULD FEEL AND THE RISKS TO THEM!

When that is the issue, I don't give a f*** about what you and the rest of the world thinks. Jesus Christ, this guy needs some divine intervention, or, at least, never ever let him be responsible for a couple of kids in a public park. Take care of him. I am done.

You will if you ever try to enter a restroom while my female kin are using it.
You WILL WAIT until thy are done to enter and that is a promise.

Only a moron would view a 76-year-old grandpa with two little girls 5 and 7 as a threat. Jesus, now he is really all yours.

Only a moron 76 year old grandpa would try to enter a little girls restroom with their Christian father present while his little girls were tinkling.

Grandpa could end up meeting his Maker sooner than later I am afraid.
I saw a bumper sticker that said, "Perverts end up in ditches with stitches."

Seek help or pray to your God. I see the early stages of Alzheimer's. Where in your stupid head did I say that I would enter "a little girls restroom with their Christian father present while his little girls were tinkling"?

Have you ever been to a public restroom in a park, a bus station, or at an airport? Beside WOMEN and MEN did you see a sign LITTLE GIRLS?

I have argued with all kinds of a-holes but you are in a class of your own.

Boo Hoo Hoo...............now ask me if I care what YOUR OPINION is. lol
Must really steam your wrinkled up old ass to run across someone who can be a bigger dick then you are.
Actually Dick I was just giving you a taste of your own medicine to show you how a rude, arrogant, abrasive, cantankerous and all the rest of the names you are so proud of being makes a forum toxic like you have made this one chasing the majority of the old time members the hell out of here.

May my God forgive you.
You don't like arguing with an ass hole then quit being one. (How many times have you been told that here now ?)(It ain't one mans opinion)

However if you can't find the self control to do that at least PLEASE stay the hell on topic of the threads.
Got it !

I never engage in personal attacks until an a-hole like you calls me a pervert or a liar, or deliberately distorts my posts and argues with the distorted versions.

You have no self control at all do you.
Focus now Dick.........s.t.a.y. o.n. t.o.p.i.c.


Seems that you do though with your above post.


I don't think you even know when you are being reckless with the truth do you.
I never called you a pervert and the ONLY time I ever called you a liar is when you claimed U.S. passports were $35 back in 2010.

As far as "distorting" the gospel of Dick posts as you claim I was merely debating objectively with the gospel of johnny reb and you had a meltdown to think someone could have a different perspective/opinion to p iss in your cornflakes.

So if you really don't give a f*** about what the rest of the world thinks as you are claiming and don't want to be called a liar then zip it or at least PLEEEZE STAY ON TOPIC !!!!!!!!!!!.

You are trashing my thread here.

The latest is that North Korea wants the U.S. to drop the sanctions the U.S. implemented on them yet N. Korea keeps their nuclear ambitions going full bore.

Being that the U.S. is still technically at war with N. Korea I wonder how much patience Trump will have.

Which is a great pity, indeed!. The 76-year old pervert Rich Mazur is in fact the greatest idiot the PF has ever seen.


Yes, the old pervert has been known to be a liar, too.

This section of the forum is - you wouldn't believe it - Off-Topic.
Hence, topic is what I say it is. Don't like it? Have me banned.

This is so funny I decided to share it. A comment from quora.com:

Parliamentary elections that took place last Sunday - results:
United Russia Party 54.20%
Communist Party 13.34%
Liberal-Democratic Party 13.14%
Just Russia Party 6.22%

The US has more commies than Russia. Actually, about 49% that's about to become 51% in November. Now, that is so funny it hurts.

Stay on topic of the THREAD bean brain.
For example this thread is about "American Political News in relation to Poland."
You on the other hand are using it as the Random Chat thread to troll with which is Off-Topic of the Thread that you are so famous for doing.


You can feel it coming can't you..

Another win for Trump. Quoting from money.cnn

Daimler has abandoned plans to expand in Iran as US sanctions targeting the country snap back into place.

I love this guy.

And on top of that Trump just announced (as of midnight of last night) that ANY country that trades aluminum or steel to Iran is done doing business with the U.S.

Damn I love this guy.

I always felt good being an American. Well, almost always. But with Trump writing those executive orders and being hated by the rest of the world, Israel excepted, it feels extra special. Iran agreement - gone. Paris Accords - gone. NATO - on notice. TPP - gone. NAFTA - under remodeling. Illegals - zero tolerance. Democrats - out of things to run on. Pope - ignored. North Korea - ?. China - tariffs.

I have only one bit of advice for Trump: Mr. President, tell you wife and your daughter to shut the f*** up.

Another quote from the same article: "The company has not sold cars in Iran since 2010."
LOL!


Until nobody is willing to do business with us anymore. Aren't we special?

If nobody did any business with the US, the US would keep 800,000,000,000 dollars at home. That is the amount of trade deficit each and every year - the money that leaves and comes back to buy things like real estate and the US T-bill, which, once sold, chip away at our political and economic independence. That's also a lot of jobs that could stay at home in the US.

That sentence of yours above means that if the United States were the only country on Earth, the United States could not exist. Do you realize how ridiculous that insinuation is? One disclaimer: we would need some rare metals from Africa. That's it. But never manufacturing.

@johnny reb

He's only doing that because the Zionists are influencing him to hate Iran. There is no other reason. Although I love Trump, I'm against some of his foreign policies as many don't help Americans - they only help Israel.

He talks about how European countries aren't paying their fair share for defense. Well Israel isn't either and we give them tens of billions of dollars every year. Yet I guaruntee you'll never hear Trump say Israel needs to pay more for defense.


You're telling me there's not a single 2010 or newer Mercedes in Iran? I find that hard to believe. They were likely purchased through a 3rd country and imported in as many goods are. So indirectly there's definitely daimler products making their way to Iran and I'm positive the c suite knows this.

Sanctions don't do anything to leaders except hurt the common people so much that many eventually vent their frustration on their leaders, which in many cases leads to violence as the state theb pushes the line that they're under attack by an aggressive foreigner, cracks down on those opposing the government, then there's demonstrations riots, which are violently suppressed, then coups either attempted or successful, possible civil war.... this same **** has happened countless times in modern history. But in countries with a strong leadership and government with firm control over citizenry, sanctions arely accomplish the desired means - russia didnt give up Crimea and spent a bill building a bridge to it, kept it's military modernization programs save for the t50/pak fa, Assad won the Syrian war, north Korea still built and tested nukes and missles... all sanctions do is hurt the citizenry by causing the currency to decline causing extreme spikes in prices for imports, inflation, etc. Only in weaker states where government isn't as powerful do sanctions achieve the desired effects.

Sanctions aren't going to make irans military any less powerful, it won't reduce the threat to Israel and if anything makes them thinks its all the more necessary to have nukes in case us or Israel goes to the next step that's even more aggressive like say an economic blockade. Then you can definitely expect a violent conflict. All sanctions will do is make average citizens lives more miserable - a chunk of whom will blame the US for their woes and another chunk will blame their own government. But it's not going to lead to any successful coups that's for sure - the ayatollahs, quds force, etc will all remain. Plus Iran just became even more powerful as now Iraq is basically Iran's b1tch. A trillion spent in Iraq over decades, since the 80s Iran Iraq war when us supported and armed saddam, and the thing the US feared most is what happened - an Iraqi leadership that's friendly with Iran and where shia clerics decide who's going to be president, pm, etc

Iran shouldn't give up its nukes or abandon it's program. Who is the US to decide who can have nukes and who can't? If i were president of Poland is start a nuclear program on day 1 to have a powerful deterrent to prevent future invasion. Thats why America will never invade north Korea. They may obliterate them and all their 1950s 60s ussr equipment, but so will nk obliterate Seoul.

We only have a trade deficit because we are buying more from other nations than they buy from us. Not doing business with the US could simply mean that the others stop purchasing some of our strategic products. You know, like China getting their soybeans from Brazil now, or the empty promise by Juncker that the EU will buy some. Have you asked yourself already how Brussels would be able to force any private company in Europe to get our GMO crap? Maybe if American farmers go well below the Brazilian price they might take some. Whose loss is that?


No, it simply means that we cannot go it alone because we can't manufacture everything ourselves. Neither do we have the workforce for that, nor the necessary knowhow. Not to mention that the domestic demand wouldn't be big enough to generate profit. You want socialism like Trump with his farmer welfare? Because that would be the only solution. Until we'll go bankrupt like the old USSR, that is.


Which will continue to happen, of course. You cannot prevent a global corporation from selling its goods.

Again, you post conveniently evades and deflects from my main point which is this: 800 billion of trade deficit is unsustainable for the country as a whole. Trump represents the whole of US, not just the farmers in Iowa.

So, here is the question I would like you to answer without evasion: Do you know any entity - a person, a family, a corporation, or a country - that can run a deficit forever?

This is a yes no question, not an essay question. Unless you answer that question, all other sophistry is moot.