Harry
6 Aug 2014 #2041
Other possibilities:
a) they were kept in the largest Ukrainian weapons stash, which the rebels captured... or maybe they didn't, no one knows it exactly
a) they were kept in the largest Ukrainian weapons stash, which the rebels captured... or maybe they didn't, no one knows it exactly
The Buks captured by the terrorists were not operational, as both the terrorists and the Ukrainian government agree.
b) they were stationed at Ukrainian barracks, which the rebels captured
The Buks captured by the terrorists were not operational, as both the terrorists and the Ukrainian government agree.
c) Ukrainian soldiers changed sides with their equipment
No Ukrainian soldiers equipped with Buks changed sides, as both the terrorists and the Ukrainian government agree.
d) the equipment was bought on the grey market
There is no grey market for Buk missiles. If there was, AQ or other terrorist organisations with large funds would have used them in the past.
e) the Ukrainian army shot down the plane
If there was even a shred of evidence to support that, the Kremlin's propaganda dept. would have made sure it was all over RT, Itar-Tass, RIA Novosti, etc. But there isn't, so they haven't. Instead reliable sources say that the missile came from terrorist-held land.
f) the plane wasn't shot down by a surface-to-air missile but by something else, like a jet figher
If there was even a shred of evidence to support that, the Kremlin's propaganda dept. would have made sure it was all over RT, Itar-Tass, RIA Novosti, etc. But there isn't, so they haven't. Instead reliable sources say that the missile came from terrorist-held land.


