USA News and Poland - part 18

What do you call it then, wise guy?

Your hero, Taco Don, has been found by a jury to be a rapist, but not a rapist of children. We only know for a fact that he likes to watch naked 14-year-old girls getting changed and we know that for a fact because he's done it an boasted about it.

I see you still believe everything you see on FauxNews. The reality is that the WIG and the DAX are doing much better than the NASDAQ or S&P 500, Latvia alone has far more troops in Europe north of the Alps and Poland isn't Ukraine (although one has to forgive you confusing the two, as you've never been to either).


Much like his bootlickers, as demonstrated by Joke here.

The Chinese must be pissing themselves laughing: first Americans elected the orange-skinned pervert and soon after the international law-based order started collapsing from within, without a single shot being fired. And now Golden Cow is turning America against its own allies. Russia and China could never have hoped for a better (for them) American president.

At least for Russia this is an investment paying off. Both of Taco Don's adult sons have confirmed that a lot of the funding they need comes from Russia:

Geez, and here I was thinking you're an intelligent party.
---

Times have changed; long before Trump, he was the first to recognize reality, and after Trump, there will be more of the same. It's not temporary.
Venting is counterproductive.

Yeah, but the USA could easily have squeezed two or three more decades of normal and stable world out of it. Instead Trump decided to go full-retard right away. Oh, well...


True. We have to analyse the best possible scenarios for Poland; we can't turn back time.

Uff, 'what if' scenario favorite pastime of usless politicians in Poland and political commentators.

So when someone says "a jury found him to be a rapist," they're conflating a civil verdict with a criminal conviction, either out of ignorance or because they hope no one checks. Insults aren't evidence. Try again when you have an argument delphiadope!

Civil liability isn't a criminal conviction. He was never found guilty of rape. Words still mean things, no matter how much you want them not too.

Keep trolling. It's easier than contributing anything of substance.

Years of posting, endless opinions, and still nothing but noise. All mouth, no weight.


Funny, I thought intelligence meant independent thought, not years of copy-paste leftard propaganda.

Im waiting for him to post another teen-vouge article and treat it like gospel.......

The court documents are very very clear:

law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca2/23-793/23-793-2024-12-30.html


Yes, and every single one of the words I've used is provable fact: your hero, Taco Don, has been found by a jury to be a rapist.

I wonder why you want to defend a rapist who brags about watching naked 14-year-olds getting changed. Is that behaviour you'd like to engage in yourself? Or do you think only your leaders should engage in it?

@Lazarus
You're done pretending this is about law or facts.

You lost the legal argument, so now you're resorting to moral blackmail and personal smears. That's the move of someone who can't defend their position anymore.

Civil liability is not a criminal conviction. You know that. I know that. Everyone reading this knows that. You keep lying anyway because outrage is all you have left.

And the moment you imply that disagreeing with you means someone supports criminal behavior, you've exposed yourself. That's not debate. That's desperation.

You're not here to discuss anything. You're here to scream, accuse, and feel righteous. That's why you keep escalating. That's why you keep repeating yourself. And that's why no one takes you seriously anymore.

The simple fact is that a jury found that Taco Don raped E. Jean Carroll. No matter how many insults you fling or how much you cry, a jury will still have found that Taco Don raped E. Jean Carroll. I'm quite content at how much that simple fact gets under your skin.


Where have I said that Taco Don is a convicted rapist? I haven't said that. I've said that he has been found by a jury to be a rapist. And he has.
Of course he's also a 34-time convicted felon, convicted by an entirely different jury of course.


There's nothing here to discuss: a jury found that Taco Don raped E. Jean Carroll.

But what we can discuss is why you want to defend a rapist who brags about watching naked 14-year-olds getting changed. Can you tell us? Or is it just the obvious reason?

And she immediately got amnesia and was cured 20 or 30 years later. Yes, that makes sense.

No, she just didn't report it. She only got the courts involved when he starting lying about raping her.

Does that mean she liked it? Maybe she found out that she can make some serious money on such a story, and being an old hag nobody wants anymore, with nothing to loose she went for it?
I don't know, I just don't understand how long one needs to think about reporting about a rape, either report it or not, don't wait 50 years before making it an issue. Nobody remembers anything after so much time passes, and any proof is gone.

Wow. Asking if a rape victim liked being raped. A new low even for you. I can see why you and Joke get on so well.

This is all crap.... we all know that Trump is a bit of a pervert, but a rapist? No.....

It was another witch hunt with a kangaroo court. Those 34 felonies are being appealed and will soon be thrown out by the appellate court.

Did you notice that anyone who disagrees Lazarus becomes morally contaminated by association. That's not debate, it's a smokescreen to avoid arguing facts.

Funny how the writing style is identical to Delphiadope. Same diatribe, same pacing, same outrage script. Almost like it's coming from the same keyboard

That's what a Jury of his peers found. I know that the US judicial system is a joke but gotta ask yourself how someone as rich as Trump couldn't buy the verdict he wanted like all the other innocent rich men.


Surely Not! the best judicial system in the world...shocked I tell you.

The jury which heard all the evidence (which you haven't heard) came to a completely different decision to you.


Yes, but on what grounds? The grounds that he didn't commit the felonies that he was convicted of? Nope. Instead Taco Don is claiming that because he's now president he shouldn't have been tried when he wasn't president for crimes that he committed while he also wasn't president. Even you can see how laughable those grounds are.


Care to point to any diatribe, pacing or outrage? Or will that question meet the same response as the one about why you want to defend a rapist who brags about watching naked 14-year-olds getting changed? If I were Delph, I'd probably say out loud the reason that you defend a rapist who brags about watching naked 14-year-olds getting changed. But I'm not, so I won't. It's not as if I need to, we all know full well why you so admire a rapist who brags about watching naked 14-year-olds getting changed.

Unless you sat on the jury, you didn't hear the evidence either! lol


Appeals are about legal errors, not just guilt or innocence. If you don't know that, maybe stop pretending you understand the case.


Disagreeing with you isn't admiration. It's just disagreement. The smear is doing all the work because you have no argument left.

You know who did heard all the evidence? The jury. And you know who found that Taco Don raped E. Jean Carroll? The jury. No matter how much you wish he hasn't, your hero, Taco Don, has been found by a jury to be a rapist.


And Taco Don isn't even bothering to argue that he's innocent, it's all that because he's now president he shouldn't have been tried when he wasn't president for crimes that he committed while he also wasn't president.


Facts aren't smears.
It's a fact that Taco Don has been found by a jury to be a rapist.
It's a fact that Taco Don has been caught boasting about sexually assaulting women.
It's a fact that Taco Don has been bragging about about watching naked 14-year-olds getting changed.
It's a fact that all of the above gets under your skin.

That's me, lowest of the low. I dared to ask a question. How could I?
---

Even if he said it, so what? I mean, is that a crime if you happen to see a 14-year-old (or a number of them) changing?

If you happened by chance to see a naked 14-year-old, perhaps one who was changing at beach and as you were walking past accidentally dropped a towel that was covering bits up, that wouldn't necessarily be crime. But it isn't want the rapist Taco Don did. He deliberately went into a room where he knew that there would be naked 14-year-old girls. That is a crime.


No. The lowest of the low would be rapists who like to boast about committing sexual assault ("Grab 'em by the pussy") and watching naked 14-year-olds getting changed. And then slightly above them are the people who defend those rapists and claim that the verdicts of juries are merely smears.

Post some facts.


True.


Again, post some facts.

He's provided no facts, and his entire diatribe has already been debunked.

Today in Davos Gavin Newsome makes a total fool out of himself again!

How Gavin Newsom's troll act bombed at the elitist Davos conference

nypost.com/2026/01/20/opinion/how-gavin-newsoms-troll-act-bombed-at-the-elitist-davos-conference/
He went to Davos determined to use that elitist venue to undermine Trump; instead he made himself a fool (or clown) in world leaders' eyes.

• 
  621164120_1016477894.jpg
  
• 
  616067701_1223521399.jpg
  

• 
  618646345_4419410648.jpg
  

European leaders are once again consulting the dictionary to check the meaning of the word "ally"...



"I did so much for humanity! Those gifts should be given to ME!"

There's a link to the court file in post #645. Have a read.


Listen to him bragging at the 1.15 mark in this video:




More lies from everybody's least favourite window-cleaner.
Hilarious to see him recommending Bessent as an economic guru. The same Bessent who, during the interview that photo is of, said "Maybe your parents for their retirement have bought 5, 10, 12 homes." How more out of touch could he be?!
reddit.com/r/lostgeneration/comments/1qi5bn4/bessent_someone_maybe_your_parents_for_their/

Germany or USA?

• 
  Germany - USA
  

If this is the level of comparison, the argument is already dead. All that's left is TDS.

I honestly thought you were smarter than this. Clearly, I overestimated you.

@Joker
I just hate hypocrisy and RDS (Reason Derangement Syndrome). From today's news:

"Border Patrol Agent Shoots Armed Suspect In Minneapolis. DHS tells Fox News the suspect was armed with a gun, which has been recovered.."

The headline is supposed to justify the murder because it mentions that the suspect was "armed." So now, all of a sudden, MAGATS forget that Americans are allowed to carry concealed weapons; is it news for them to justify outrage?

Edit: Source from Congressional correspondent for @foxnews in DC: x.com/BillMelugin_/status/2015091985153929274