POLANDA : - powered by PolishForums   Classifieds [75] Off-Topic [334]
2697    

Off-Topicpage 61 of 90

2016 Presidential Elections in the US



johnny reb
26 May 2016  #1801

The reason the GOP and everyone else is scared to death of him (Capital Hill, Lobbyists, the Clinton Foundation, Foreign Powers, The top 1%), is because Trump doesn't play by the "Good ole Boys Rules".
Trump is going to make so much transparent that it will tumble their little clubs to ashes taking their bully powers away from them forever.
My prayer is that he starts by doing away with the Federal Reserve and putting Hillary in prison where she belongs.
Next expose the lies about 9/11 and let Bush and Cheney swing.
Trump is salivating with excitement to expose the Clinton Crime Family's corruption that the News Media has ignored as hush hush.
There are going to be a lot of embarrassed starched white shirts and suit pants.
We are gonna need a truck load of popcorn between now and November.
This is what America has been waiting three generations for.

TheOther
26 May 2016  #1802

Trump is going to make so much transparent

Let's start with his tax returns then...

johnny reb
26 May 2016  #1803

He is way to smart to pay any taxes.

dolnoslask
26 May 2016  #1804

"Let's start with his tax returns then.", No chance he will have presidential immunity while in office , let the fun begin.

We will have to rename Libtards Liztards, because they will be chasing rocks to hide under,once the Trumpster puts the magnifying glass on them.

TheOther
26 May 2016  #1805

He is way to smart to pay any taxes

That's not smart, that's anti-social behavior motivated by greed. Wasn't it you who complained about all the corporations hiding their profits in offshore tax havens? How is Trump any different if he's able to avoid taxes even though he's probably making $50 million or more a year?

nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/07/22/f-e-c-releases-donald-trumps-financial-disclosure-statement

dolnoslask
26 May 2016  #1806

" he's probably making $50 million or more a year?" Good man if he scales that up for USA Inc he will have done a grand job.

Lyzko
26 May 2016  #1807

Paying taxes and playing by the rules doesn't make him clever, but criminal.

You appear to ignore the fact that more and more people are going to lash out more and more aggresively as their rights are taken from them by those who've stolen them. Trump wants a takeover just like in the film "Seven Days in May" (John Frankenheimer 1966), not a natural, democratic transition of power:-)

@Johnny,

Even the handicapped need help. Furthermore, not every handicapped person is some babbling retard who soils his trousers and is constantly in and out of rehab. How about those whom Reagan uncaringly unemployed during his presidency and whom it took on average NEARLY A DECADE to finally get back on their feet???

Where's your humanity?

johnny reb
26 May 2016  #1808

And for the sake of Sanity don't come back with your "poor down on their luck" bleeding heart liberal tear jerking garbage.

@Johnny,Even the handicapped need help.
You would make a preacher swear.
How did I know you would do exactly what I said you would do ? lol
I AM NOT TALKING ABOUT THE PEOPLE WHO QUALIFY FOR IT DINGBAT !
I am talking about the people from four generations of being on welfare.
I am talking about the girls popping out babies one after another by different fathers just to get a bigger welfare check and "entitlements".
I am talking about drug dealers getting welfare.
I am talking about the disability scammers.
I am talking about lazy people that are capable of being a greeter at Walmart.
Lyzko where I live there are over 2000 help wanted jobs that are not being filled yet there is a very high unemployment rate in the area.
Please explain why these lazy government handi capped deserve part of what I worked for.
And NEVER bring up another sob story about a retarded person that needs help as those are not who I am talking about and you know it.
Now, get with it and quit your damn pity party for 80% of the welfare recipients that DO NOT deserve it because they are physically capable to be employed even if it amounts to pulling weeds or walking dogs

dolnoslask
26 May 2016  #1809

" more aggresively as their rights are taken from them " You mean benefits god forbid they are going to have to get a JOB!!!!

aggresively The home Guard will deal with any of that business.

Lyzko
26 May 2016  #1810

Johnny my friend, you lump all people whom you detest into the SAME category as those honestly in dire need of help! Of course I'm not talking about giving social leeches and other miscreants greater leg room!! I'm talking about the people whom FDR deigned to help, the truly down and out among us on whom society's given up.

dolnoslask
26 May 2016  #1811

deigned? do you mean denied if so very true Yalta and the Polish people is a good example of denial.

johnny reb
27 May 2016  #1812

Johnny my friend, you lump all people whom you detest into the SAME categor

Oh Bull **** Lyzko, where did you ever come up with that flat out lie.
YOU are the one that lump them all into one category and then cherry pick when you get called out on it.
I even tell you what you are going to post before you post it you are so predictable with your liberal agenda.
Let's move on and talk about what a failure the president you voted for twice is.

johnny reb
27 May 2016  #1813

Let's start with his tax returns then...

Trump has continued to report negative income - and therefore not pay taxes - because of loopholes and dubious deductions that benefit powerful real estate interests. They say it's likely that whatever taxes he does pay would be at a rate lower than the average worker pays.
That's typical for Trump's line of work.
Because of depreciation, the deductibility of interest and other tax breaks, the effective tax rate on the real estate sector is lower than most industries, and in some cases negative.
He is doing nothing to dishonest. :-)

Marsupial
27 May 2016  #1814

Can't wait till this dumb goat gets into power it will be very entertaining.

johnny reb
27 May 2016  #1815

You bet it will........we can't wait.
Obama, all your unconstitutional executive orders are now null.
Your Obama Care is now null and void.
Hillary you are going to prison where you belong.
The Trump Wall will be built.
Yes it will be very entertaining.
So Auzzie old boy, what sha ya got goin' down der' under with what's his name, kangaroo 'Malcolm Turnbull' that is entertaining ?
His name alone is entertaining.

Marsupial
27 May 2016  #1816

He is also a dumb goat. Not even prime minister, usurper, another one. It's a trend lately.

Lyzko
27 May 2016  #1817

...in that case, he'll be that much easier for the Dems to jerk around once in office:-)

Don't hold your breath thoughLOL

AdrianK9
28 May 2016  #1818

Many polls have Hillary and Trump neck and neck. Talking heads point out examples like McCain leading in polls in 2008 around the same point in the election and Romney being very popular - both were beaten miserably though. Nonetheless, they do admit that Trump has defied precedent and made many critics and reporters look like idiots by proving them wrong. He is doing things that have never been done before.

Johnny, I can tell you I did like two of Obama's policies:

1) Obamacare - yes, it's an extremely expensive system, the doctors and hospitals hate it, coverage has gone up astronomically, and there is definitely better options. Nonetheless, Obamacare allowed my mother to have health insurance for the first time in I don't know how long (10, 15 years - maybe more?) simply due to pre-existing conditions. She feels that the $500 a month bill she receives is a Godsend. She is finally able to take care of her body and do tests and procedures she otherwise wouldn't of been able to afford without insurance - colonoscopy, stomach surgery (removal of polyps), etc. Again though, I do feel that there are better options. To me it really doesn't matter one way or another because although I am healthy, I work out regularly, and I eat only the best food (I never eat ground beef for example, drink soda, or potato chips) I still refuse to work for a company that won't provide me with good health insurance - just in case... Also, I believe Obamacare forced companies that employ above a certain amount of people to offer health insurance to their employees. Yes, many corporations try to go around this by hiring more part time people and contractors - but nonetheless it gave people insurance to people who would otherwise be unable to afford it - or even unable to purchase it due to preexisting conditions

2) The Iran deal - I am a fan of just about any program that puts Israel on its toes. The fact that the IAEA has inspected Iran's facilities more than ANY other country in the world shows that Iran is complying with international guidelines. Nonetheless, the Zio controlled media and Zio controlled dems and reps both push for sanctions on Iran, dismantling their nuclear program - which again has been inspected more than any other country, and just general hawkish rhetoric towards Iran. Saudi Arabia has hurt the US far more than Iran ever did - yet we consider the Saudis our friends and allies and Iran the 'axis of evil' because the Zionist lobby dictates US foreign policy and Zionist media tells us what to think. The fact is Israel has a nuclear weapons program - everyone knows that. Yet, Israel has NEVER allowed inspectors inside its nuclear facilities. So again, Iran - inspected more than any other country in the world (questionable nuclear program - facilities were found to be for peaceful purposes according to inspectors) VS Israel - never inspected despite clearly having a nuclear weapons program. Another example of why the Zionist government of Israel and it's lobbies in the US are the most hypocritical, arrogant, deceitful and manipulative bunch of scum bags in the modern civilized western world.

Trump isn't perfect - I won't lie. Nonetheless, I totally support him because it really takes a business man to run this country. When Trump says that our politicians don't read much of the bills and trade deals they sign - it's totally true. After 9/11, Bush passed a bunch of bills like the patriot act which no one really bothered to read and stressed the urgency of passing this ASAP. Since that time period, the presidency has learned that it can pass bills as it pleases without anyone reading it and if there is opposition, then Obama just uses executive orders. Trump actually understands how deals work and is a deal maker. I mean even his book is titled 'Art of the Deal.' This is the kind of person we need. Hillary criticizes Trump by saying 'everything's negotiable with Trump' - well, the truth is we don't even bother to negotiate much anymore. We're a bunch of wimps. That why countries, lobbyists, and bankers take so much advantage of politicians and in turn the citizenry. They're a bunch of spineless weakling - there are very, very few politicians that actually fight for what is right and fight for the citizens. However, they're a minority - and they get voted out by the majority of spineless politicians. Even among these few brave politicians - even fewer will criticize Israel. One particular person I remember is a black politician from I believe Alabama - he criticized a Zionist policy in a lucid, thoughtful arguement, and his career has never since recovered.

Hillary's slogan is 'Fighting For Us' which is true - if you're a welfare king and queen living off the government for generations, an illegal immigrant, the 1%-2% of LGBT population, the 47% that doesn't pay federal income tax, socialists/communists, or a coddled college student/graduate who blames capitalism for why he or she still lives with their parents and claims that they can't get a good job (How about instead of marching with BLM, you fill out a couple of job applications instead).

The truth, if you're a proud hard working, tax paying citizen - then it's Trump who's fighting for you.

AdrianK9
28 May 2016  #1819

Lyzko where I live there are over 2000 help wanted jobs that are not being filled yet there is a very high unemployment rate in the area.

Johnny, you have to understand that when the unemployment figure is calculated by the BLS it only includes people that have been out of work for a short period of time (I believe it's either 4 or 6 months) and looking for work.

The people who have been out of work say 8 months, gave up on looking for work, or aren't looking for work anymore are not classified as unemployed by the BLS. Rather, they are classified as 'not in labor force.'

That is why the unemployment figure is a totally misleading number. We don't have 6% 7% or whatever unemployment. The 'out of labor force' (people aged 16 to 65) further divided by groups according to why people aren't in the labor force and they include things such as in school, taking care of kids, disabled/sick, gave up on job prospects, stay at home spouse, early retired, etc. However, by far the largest group is 'does not currently want a job.' You can look this up on BLS.gov. I posted the link a while back - this group of people aged 16 to 65 who are out of the labor force because they 'don't wan't a job' amounts to I believe 60 million or 80 million people.

To me, that would qualify as unemployed - but not the BLS as 'people who don't want a job aged 16-65' is considered not in labor force - separate from unemployed.

So when you add this 6%-7% figure of people that are actually unemployed (meaning they're not working but are looking for work) plus the 60-80 million that aren't working because they don't want a job, now you see that well over 20% of the US labor force (men and women aged 15-65) is simply unemployed or doesn't want to work. Again, this wouldn't include people that are disabled, sick, (those are the people that I agree need financial help and assistance - although the new definitions of 'disabled' are very, very questionable) in school, taking care of kids, etc. as those are a different subset of 'not in labor force.'

Google BLS Labor Force Participation and you'll find it or you can search the forums by type in keywords like 'bls labor force' and you should see my old post with the specific link. Again, not sure if the figure was 60 million or 80 million but regardless, the number of people aged 15-65 that aren't participating in labor force because they don't want a job is ridiculously high.

TheOther
28 May 2016  #1820

Now Mr. Trump claims that there is no drought in California, just to please some farmers. Somebody should tell him that the Central Valley is sinking because they are depleting the groundwater.

jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=4693

Mr Wiech
28 May 2016  #1821

Many polls have Hillary and Trump neck and neck

After what Clinton said about Poland its clear that for Poland's would be better if Trump would became a president.

johnny reb
29 May 2016  #1822

Now Mr. Trump claims that there is no drought in California, just to please some farmers.

And here I was reading about the 13" of snow and all the rain northern California was getting.

latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-california-snow-20160522-snap-story.html

TheOther
29 May 2016  #1823

Trump was talking about the Sacramento and San Joaquin River, and that he'd rather provide water to some fat cat farmers than to protect endangered species. Whether that's acceptable or not might be debatable, but the fact that CA is in the middle of a drought is not. Despite the heavy snow pack and the recent rainfalls, 86% of the state is under drought condition.

droughtmonitor.unl.edu/Home/StateDroughtMonitor.aspx?CA

johnny reb
29 May 2016  #1824

Not to worry as California is going to fall into the ocean any day now when the big earthquake hits.
Crooked Hillary will loose lots of votes and Trump will win with a/the "Landslide". (pun intended)
Trump will only be in for four years so I can't understand why all you Liberals are getting wigged out over this election.

porky pok
29 May 2016  #1825

I just received my official primary sample ballot,Trump is the way to go:))on June7th

Lyzko
30 May 2016  #1826

Johnny, it's those 2000 some odd out of work folks making it tough for unemployed people to find work! If they had "regular" aka full-time jobs, then they wouldn't be making it harder for the people without to find employment.

johnny reb
30 May 2016  #1827

Lyzko where I live there are over 2000 help wanted jobs that are not being filled yet there is a very high unemployment rate in the area.

I have no idea what you are talking about Lyzko.
Please rephrase your response to why those 2000 jobs are not being filled by the high amount of unemployed people in the area.

Ziemowit
30 May 2016  #1828

Me too, I am in desperate need for reading this sentence of his in a re-phrased form. But I am not a native speaker of English or American, you know ...

johnny reb
30 May 2016  #1829

When I come to Poland I will teach you how to speak with a southern drawl so you will be the most unique English speaking Pole in all of Poland. (A Polish cowboy)
You can teach me how to ask for another beer, no I do not have anymore and say to the girls, "you have a very pretty smile."
I also am looking forward to riding on that train you spoke of in your P.M.

delphiandomine
30 May 2016  #1830

When I come to Poland I will teach you how to speak with a southern drawl so you will be the most unique English speaking Pole in all of Poland. (A Polish cowboy)

That's not much to be proud of, given that most Poles believe that Southern accents = rednecks.

Ziemowit, take it from me, you should aim for a nice trans-Atlantic accent if you want an American accent. It's by far the best English accent in the world, although it's not genuine.


PreviousNext
Why are Muslims told to assimilate but Jews don't have to? [10]Monarchy vs The Republic [8]


Off-Topic / 2016 Presidential Elections in the UStop