Where is the bias here?
Let me explain specific facts, actually glaring differences; allow me to illustrate.
In the left corner: Jon coproducer, with Delph, of slanderous, unfounded posts, repeated endlessly without a shred of proof. An incident in an
imaginary restaurant named Warsaw.Obviously a lie. Cargo took care of them on his own, without help from moderators. You don't want me to quote countless, sleazy
posts with sick, perverted content. Numerous attacks and character assassinations of a private nature concerning Johnny, the good, honorable man, and equating him with the caricature of a fabricated monster named Jim. Sure Jonny fought effectively, sometimes roughly, fighting fabricated lies with the inconvenient truth.
Any ingenious suggestions on how to deal with a certified porker? Bending over and kissing his a*rse is not in Johnny's repertoire. So coming from
A self-proclaimed genius who knows the secrets of proper quotations :
Johnny and Cargo's two warnings and Jon's two are way out of wack, with no balance at all because fighting a slender with the truth is advisable action.:::)))
See the smileys, no malice intended.
It's seems to me, that you have put yourself forward as the great voice of reason, and "fair play" on PF,
Exactly, I second your unbias opinion:::))) There exist the remote possibility that you were trying to be quip, maybe even sarcastic.
Vincent, sarcasm, if used correctly, can be of great value in the exchange of ideas, but in your example, it bites you right back. So, in the future, try to avoid it.
Because your superiority in quoting correctly versus lack of skill in the area of your expertise is, how can I say it, worthless and pitiful,
not to mention repetitious, like someone grabbing the bone and unable to let go of it?:::))) Smileys galore Do you appreciate it?
Do you still think this is a personal vendetta?
I doubt you read Pawian's post, the most wicked, corrupted, evil, and perverted post ever, even judging by the worst of Szczelec's creations. Equal and surpassing
Delph's depravity. If you wish, you can read the waste by the unmasked evil beast; I reposted it yesterday in bold print so you can not miss it.
I am not seeking his suspension; those are worthless. Stewing in his hate and incivility is far more painful than suspension.
So now we come to the main disagreement. Balanced dispensation of punishment
Pawan's two warnings= Ptak's two warnings. Sorry, you are comparing rotten apples to oranges. Might as well compare homicide maniak to great voice reason
and fair play. How can anybody pretend not to see the unmasking of the evil beast, bursting like an excrement-filled balloon, defiling the PF pages?
I don't speak for everybody, but the truth is undeniable in this case. Read it on the PF pages. From time to time, I will repost vile messages to remind
evil-doer of his depravity. Any more sarcasm in return, or are we good?:::)))