Soros uses millions to fan mirgant crisis and destroy Europe

Try a bit harder - can you prove that these 'sharia zones' exist except in your imagination?


What does your confessor think about you using terms like that about humans?

They are not official

So therefore about as real as Po's 'armed attack dogs'.

For the record, I have and will always refer to police dogs trained to attack and incapcitate pursued criminals as attack dogs whether or not this or that Brit approves.
Re microchipping babies, years ago in an 'online discussion forum someone critical of senseless EU innovations said somethign along the liens of: "I wouldn't be surprised if next the EU demand that newborn infants get microchipped." I casually shared that imrpession on PF and nothing more. I never reported it in an agency story or private article. Having explained the above, now the hariless one and his mates will be adding another lie to their collection if they say I claim babies are being microchipped. Why dredge up stuff such as 22 or 27 sq. m Jana Pawla II flats and their live-in Ukrainian housekeepers?

Police dogs are very simply not trained to attack anybody; they are trained to restrain if necessary.

Perhaps the utter inability some people display with regard to what really happens may explain why they so rabidly attack one of the world's greatest philanthropists.


Have you heard the expression 'people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones'? I'd be more than happy to demonstrate exactly why it's a very bad idea for you to even mention anybody's family, do you really want any discussion about somebody's relationship with one of his children, the one he refuses to even acknowledge the existence of?

Or more likely tried to be mischievous. Not much to do with Mr Soros at all. Rather like your 'sharia zones', something he's never suggested.

I'm fascinated with what you have concocted this time round and would love to hear about it. But be sure to use facts, dates, places, names, etc, otherwise you'll just be spouting more hot air.

You said that over and over and that's only your point of vierw. To me they are and will always be attack dogs. Full stop.

To the best of my knowledge he has never openly mentioned or advocated Sharia, but his open society agenda is effectviely leading to the the spread of such areas. Alreday the UK and other Western countries are peppered with Sharia zones whether you like it or not. Do some Googling and see what you get for Sharia.

So why pretend he had?

Yet you're unable to give a single example of one...

After I read the source you have based your whole thread around, there is no possible way I can take this report seriously, especially considering they also link to Breitbart.
I have come across naturalnews before. The website is run by Mike Adams, opponent of modern medicine and all round general nutcase.
One of the websites latest conspiracy theories is that Bill Gates and Microsoft are in the process of developing weaponized, ethnically targeted flu viruses as part of a sinister eugenics plot!
Really Polonius, I would have thought you could find better sources to link to than this site, but then I suppose if it pushes your agenda, you'll link to anything, no matter how dodgy.
Have a read of this :-

rationalwiki.org/wiki/NaturalNews

Everything you want to hear if you are going to site sources such as Breitbart etc


I live here and I don't know of any Sharia no go zones. Have you even been to the UK?
Have a read of this :-

snopes.com/politics/religion/nogozones.asp

Truth to tell I hadn't realised thta Sharia no-go zones were another taboo of the PC's head..in.sand osrtich policy. policy. I had assumed that when the Brussels authorities said Mollenbek as a no-go zone dominated by Muslims and a breeding ground for Islamist terrorism which Belgians avoid and the police are reluctant to enter, I took them at their word.
Discussing anything with a rabid feminist, a cofnfirmed neo-Nazi or PC fanatic is pretty poitnless and one can expect some PC free-speech-muzzler to dismiss the Gatestone Institute as a dodgy ultra-right-wing hate site akin to Redwatch, but this is how the Institute described no-go zones:

"No-go zones can be defined as Muslim-dominated neighborhoods that are de facto off limits to non-Muslims due to a number of factors, including the lawlessness, insecurity or religious intimidation that often pervades these areas."

Did you even bother to read the link/s?
Fox News were forced to apologise to the residents of Birmingham, UK, for their self styled terrorism expert's opinion that Birmingham is a no-go Sharia zone. In the word's of our PM " Mr Cameron said: "Frankly I choked on my porridge and thought it must be April's Fools Day. This guy is clearly a complete idiot.

"He started with an apology. That's not a bad start. But what he should do is look at Birmingham and see what a fantastic example it is bringing people together of different faiths and different backgrounds and building a world-class brilliant city with a great and strong economy."


So when I point out your rubbish source, the only thing you can do in return is to hurl insults?


You're getting closer to the truth there.

Would you mind telling me which parts of the UK are no-go Sharia zone areas?

I suggest you take an evening stroll through the Muslim quarter of Birmingham, Then give us a full report on your findings.

Have you been there, Po?

Is the Independent in your books a dodgy neo-nazi hate rag? Because they seem to have violated the latest PC taboo when they reported:
"Paris attacks: Visiting Molenbeek, the police no-go zone that was home to two of the gunmen."


No I haven't and do not plan to. Be you should deifnitely visit and tell us all about it. Be sure to wear your rainbow scarf and a wave a Marriage Freedom placard translated into Arabic!

Po, again you're trying to twist things as usual. And as usual failing miserably.

The (Russian owned) Independent refers to an impoverished high crime area in a capital city, not one of your fantasy 'Sharia zones'...

Even that conservative commentator in the US had to make an abject apology after suggesting such rubbish.


So as usual, making things up...

They use no-go zone in which Sharia principles prevail. Luckily your stonewalling and antics with semantics have only a very limit audience -- PF. Otherwise you'd be a public menace lulling people into a false sense of security as one Muslim neighbourhood after another coalesced with those of nearby cities into one huge, contiguous Islam-dominaetd area. When people finally realised what was happening, it'd be too late. So rant away to your heart's content with your PC taboos and prejudices, because on PF you are quite harmless.

In which case, incorrectly. There are no 'Sharia zones' in Europe, any more than there are any of your 'armed attack dogs' in Warsaw city centre.

Total and absolute fantasy; toxic too, since you seem to like divisions between people.

And certainly nothing to do with the Open Freedom Foundations...

In your skewed PC world do no-go zones exist? If not, why do white Europeans tend to avoid Muslim neighbourhoods? Are they all racists?

Your non-existent 'Shariah zones' would that be? The ones with your 'armed attack dogs'?


Have you actually been to any of the places you're talking about?

Yes, in my native Michigan there are plenty of "bad neighbourhoods" where whitey drives through as fasts as he can if forced to use that route. No Caucasian dares venture into such places on foot.
As for Muslims of Middle East Origin, Dearborn has become the first American city to practise Sharia law. It has therefore become out of bounds for casually dressed females. people wearing crosses, smokers and drinkers.
nationalreport.net/city-michigan-first-fully-implement-sharia-law

Oh dear. You do realise that's a spoof article from a satirical website?


Evidently you don't...

Do they have 'armed attack dogs' as well?

My fomerly 90% Polish hometown of Hamtracmk is the first American city to have a majority Muslim town council. Actually they keep up their property a lot better than Negroes do and seem to be a better and better-behaved class of Muslims than what one sees in Europe.

Not my quote, Po, and still entirely irrelevant to your ridiculous claim that there are 'sharia zones' in Europe and that the Soros Foundation somehow encourages them.

So basically you still haven't said anything at all...

You don't see any Muslims at all, Po. We've had Muslim Poles for centuries without any problems. If you don't like our Muslims here in Europe, you're welcome to go home to your better Muslims.

Who are "We've"? You can speak only for Anglo expats or the BB tag team, not for Poland. Oh yes, I forgot, you're a plastic-card wannbe Pole! LOL!
Better start practising your Polish for your big test: To jest ręka. Czy to jest ręka?
Nie, to nie jest ręka, to jest łysa pała...

Those of us who have the right to live in Poland, those of us who have the right to vote in Poland, those of us who have the right to set foot on Polish soil. You don't fit into any of those groups, do you. Nevermind, we will decide who comes to our country, you guests can like it or leave.


The only Anglo expat who posts here is you, Po.

How much did you have tho bribe the language examiner to pass your halting, mangled, pidgin Polish? There was one "Pole" who spoke even worse -- Olis Abebe (or something like that), an Ethiopian footballer whom the ex-commie Kwaśniewski granted fast-track citizenship to.