POLANDA : - powered by PolishForums   Classifieds [75] Off-Topic [334]
94    

Off-Topicpage 2 of 4

Ever been threatened with violence on PF by another poster?



Ziemowit
14 Sep 2015  #31

How did you get back on here?

The owner of the site, Jon, decided so.

I should point your attention to the fact that neither the reason for your ban nor how long it should last was ever given to the public on this forum (it never is except for short bans sometimes). Your ban, however, was accompanied by the thread started by the admin and entitled something like "about members permanently banned on the PF), but your name had never been mentioned in it. Many PF members immediately answered this message of the admin with their own posts in which they named you as the member whom the admin's thread concerned. But as I said, no name or reason for the ban was given by the admin, and the only specific word about the ban was the adverb "permanently". That thread, however, as well as many others, have been 'conveniently' erased from the PF, so you can now claim whatever you want. But, yes, the fact that jon357, the owner of this forum, decided to un-suspend you is a very plausible explanation. Who else would be so much interested in unbanning a member who was once permanently suspended, but who had used until then to support jon's agenda so fiercely and so unconditionally?

Ironside
14 Sep 2015  #32

I have been threatened with violence on PF by another poster, or posters. Come to thing of it one creep has been emailing me until I blocked him.

So What?

delphiandomine
14 Sep 2015  #33

I should point your attention to the fact that neither the reason for your ban nor how long it should last was ever given to the public on this forum (it never is except for short bans sometimes)

Don't worry, the reason was never communicated in private too.

Your ban, however, was accompanied by the thread started by the admin and entitled something like "about members permanently banned on the PF), but your name had never been mentioned in it.

Yes, I was under the impression that there had been a cull of members, but clearly not.

Many PF members immediately answered this message of the admin with their own posts in which they named you as the member whom the admin's thread concerned. But as I said, no name or reason for the ban was given by the admin, and the only specific word about the ban was the adverb "permanently". That thread, however, as well as many others, have been 'conveniently' erased from the PF, so you can now claim whatever you want.

Threads have been erased?

That would explain why I can't find a certain thread from a while ago. Bah.

But, yes, the fact that jon357, the owner of this forum, decided to un-suspend you is a very plausible explanation.

Makes perfect sense, doesn't it?

I'm surprised it took people so long to figure out that Jon was the one with power around here and that the Admin is just his alter-ego.

johnny reb
14 Sep 2015  #34

he's teaching kids in primary school :-)

Oh dear Lord, save those children.
Are these children's parents aware ?
Someone should enlighten these children's parents to what they could be exposed to.

Who else would be so much interested in unbanning a member who was once permanently suspended, but who had used until then to support jon's agenda so fiercely and so unconditionally?

I have noticed that too Z, at first I just thought him as another member of the Brits Bully Club but know that you have pointed that out it's almost like if jon turned around real quick delph would get a brown nose.

delphiandomine
14 Sep 2015  #35

Someone should enlighten these children's parents to what they could be exposed to.

That's a pretty pathetic thing to say.

I have noticed that too Z, at first I just thought him as another member of the Brits Bully Club but know that you have pointed that out it's almost like if jon turned around real quick delph would get a brown nose.

I know where the power lies, and it lies with Jon. And only Jon.

jon357
14 Sep 2015  #36

Someone should enlighten these children's parents to what they could be exposed to.

What would they be exposed to? A first class education?

Hard to believe that some clown would threaten violence in real life because of stuff on an internet forum.

I know where the power lies, and it lies with Jon. And only Jon.

And I forbid it. Hard to enforce the rules from here on the shores of the Bosphorus. Anyway, it's Haj coming up so I'm off to Mecca to walk 7 times round that black thing.

Harry
14 Sep 2015  #37

Hard to believe that some clown would threaten violence in real life because of stuff on an internet forum.

Hard to believe that anybody would boast about breaking a nun's nose, but somebody here has done exactly that.

Wulkan
14 Sep 2015  #38

Hard to believe that some clown would threaten violence in real life because of stuff on an internet forum.

You mean like that dog walking lunatic? it is indeed unbelievable.

johnny reb
15 Sep 2015  #39

Hard to believe that anybody would boast about breaking a nun's nose, but somebody here has done exactly that.

I'm sure that little nine year old somebody had very good cause to defend him/her self Harold.
I do know that they not need defend their self to you however.
You are such a stickler about staying on topic it surprises me that you would intentionally go off thread just to try to provoke them to defend

themselves in such a manner. You little stinker you.
Hey I know, let's discuss your pleasant days that you spent in the Catholic boarding orphanage that you went to.

Someone should enlighten these children's parents to what they could be exposed to.

What would they be exposed to? A first class education?

A first class education would include being taught Christianity, about gun safety and conservatism jon.

jon357
15 Sep 2015  #40

You mean like that dog walking lunatic? it is indeed unbelievable.

No, Volcano, this is grown-up stuff.

Really some of the stories one hears is bizarre. Posters threatening to hack Facebook (harder than people think) and saying they can find someone's identity in 40 minutes (no they can't) or trying to make trouble off the forum for Warsaw residents (for example hassling their daughter).

Weird and creepy.

At least my full name, contact details etc are safe, even though in real life some people who read this forum but don't post much or at all (usually because of the racists, American teabaggers etc) do know who I am.

Ironside
15 Sep 2015  #41

or example hassling their daughter).

You mean when Harry threatened daughter of a certain dude and driven said poster from this forum?

Weird and creepy.

I agree, very creepy.

jon357
15 Sep 2015  #42

You mean someone thousands of miles away whose daughter was never threatened?

Weird and creepy that you try to denigrate an unpleasant piece of behaviour by bringing in rubbish...

Ironside
15 Sep 2015  #43

Weird and creepy that you try to denigrate an unpleasant piece of behaviour by bringing in rubbish...

Defending Harry to the hilt, I see....
You see you and me know that Harry is a harmless old fool but that dude in question didn't know that and his daughter were actually in Poland, so Harry posting her name and making vague threatening remarks knew exactly what he was doing. Father worried for his daughter safety and Harry exploiting that - creepy and nasty. jon I can understand your view even I don't share them on many things, and I'm not bothered by that but don't try to talk me into denying reality and facts just because Harry is your friend.

jon357
15 Sep 2015  #44

Or more likely, no threats were ever made.

johnny reb
15 Sep 2015  #45

even though in real life some people who read this forum but don't post much or at all (usually because of the racists, American teabaggers etc)

Now jon boy, is not someone that refers to conservatives as "teabaggers" a racist himself ?
That would be like me saying that people who do not post much or at all (usually because of the promoting of homosexuality as being 'normal' and other libertine trash and constantly promoting Islam etc.)

Not very nice in either case is it.

jon357
15 Sep 2015  #46

What a silly post, almost as if you want to force conservative teabagger American values on our liberal Europe. And not too much to do with the (right-wing American) poster who was hassling a teenage girl in Warsaw.

johnny reb
15 Sep 2015  #47

I find your post most threatening jon.
First of all any decent parent wouldn't let their teenage daughter participate on a forum like this one.
As for "our liberal Europe".......you surely must mean "my liberal middle east" as you are not from Europe so why do you keep pretending that you are a European ?

I have as much right to promote my school of conservative thought here as you do your liberal mental illness.

jon357
15 Sep 2015  #48

You find the post 'threatening'? As if you expect a fist to come flying out of the screen. As for no respectable parent allowing their teenager to come here, I rather agree.

And you can keep promoting your teabagger stuff here - nobody takes the slightest bit of notice.

How's the ganja crop this year?

Wulkan
15 Sep 2015  #49

No, Volcano, this is grown-up stuff.

Childish threatening to smash someones face while throwing a temper tantrum in front of a screen is a grown-up stuff? :-)))

jon357
15 Sep 2015  #50

Childish threatening to smash someones face while throwing a temper tantrum in front of a screen

Now who said that?

Wulkan
15 Sep 2015  #51

You write so much non sense on this forum that you lose the track of it or you don't know why in the first place.

jon357
15 Sep 2015  #52

Do explain further, Oh (edit) . Who did or said:

Childish threatening to smash someones face while throwing a temper tantrum in front of a scree


Wulkan
15 Sep 2015  #53

(edit) are you trying to say that you don't know who is a well known dog walker on this forum?

jon357
15 Sep 2015  #54

I'm just not interested, however I doubt anyone who likes doggies directly said that he or she would go and attack someone. Hypothetically, rhetorically (look them up), maybe.

Animal lovers tend to be nice people. Surely even you like nature in spite of what it did to you.

Wulkan
15 Sep 2015  #55

I'm just not interested

So why you get in discussion.

however I doubt anyone who likes doggies directly said that he or she would go and attack someone.

Indeed but yet he did say that and as for attacking someone in real, nah :-) he wouldn't dare.

Surely even you like nature in spite of what it did to you.

Nature did to me a big favour by making me a healthy man with healthy children. What nature did to you is actually something to be worried about on the other hand.

delphiandomine
15 Sep 2015  #56

You mean when Harry threatened daughter of a certain dude and driven said poster from this forum?

Who was that? I don't remember anything such.

jon357
15 Sep 2015  #57

So why you get in discussion.

Why not?

Indeed but yet he did say that and as for attacking someone in real, nah :-) he wouldn't dare.

Or perhaps he's too normal, unlike that guy whose name I forget, the one that was hassling a schoolgirl, the ultra-conservative right-wing one in Warsaw. And others best not mentioned here...

Nature did to me

It must be quite an achievement to be the first person in the family born without a tail.

Ironside
15 Sep 2015  #58

I don't recall his moniker, he was a dude from Canada, he left this forum because mods at the time didn't even suspend Harry, it caused a big stink on PF, and it is hard believe you don't remember that,

It was shortly before that stunt pulled by same here that allegedly somebody accosted Harry's foster daughter.It was an obvious #woolly -pooly# to be seen not only as a villain but as a victim, I have never fallen that.

delphiandomine
15 Sep 2015  #59

I don't recall his moniker, he was a dude from Canada, he left this forum because mods at the time didn't even suspend Harry, it caused a big stink on PF, and it is hard believe you don't remember that,

No, I honestly don't remember it. The only guy from Canada that I remember was the kebab-shop owner from Szczecin who threatened to punch me if I ever came into his kebab shop, but that was it.

It was shortly before that stunt pulled by same here that allegedly somebody accosted Harry's foster daughter.It was an obvious #woolly -pooly# to be seen not only as a villain but as a victim, I have never fallen that.

I know who that person was - it was a guy by the name of 1jola. He was notable because he signed up to the US military during the Cold War and never denied being willing to attack Poland if ordered to do so. Allegedly Polish, but I had my doubts.

jon357
15 Sep 2015  #60

it caused a big stink on PF

Because it was bull ****

allegedly somebody accosted

Not allegedly. 1Jola admitted it.


PreviousNext
non-Russians in Stalin's NKVD [13]Random Sports News [279]


Off-Topic / Ever been threatened with violence on PF by another poster?top