I was really interested in your opinions. I am not anymore.
Sorry Miranda. In my defence I can say that this subject has been in the news for over a year now. We've been inundated with the stories and the possible future directions for so long it has ceased to hold our attention. Having said that, of course, you won't have known that. So I will try to be serious for a few moments.
Firstly, the last months of Tony Blair's 'reign' have been a thinly disguised attempt to portray him as a great leader who has a marvellous legacy. Blair has always wanted to be seen in the same light as Margaret Thatcher - a great national leader who made a difference both at home and abroad. You could argue that Thatcher had that status, particularly in the eyes of the rest of the world. She was either loved or loathed at home though. Her legacy of turning the UK from a lame economic duck into a revitalised economy cannot be argued against. The social costs to our nation from her period in office are often criticised. Tony Blair is almost desperate for similar acclaim.
If you look back to the early news of 'New' Labour Blair presided upon a more centre ground of socialist policy. In many ways there was little difference between the Tories and Labour. Labour moved to the right to attract 'middle Englan' whne the Tory party was in disarray. They were fighting amongst themselves and had lost the plot in terms of policies and direction. The Blair years were to provide economic stability but not at the expense of large increases in the taxation burden, improved public services (especially in the areas of healthcare, education and emergency services) and protection of the less able and vulnerable sections of our community. The Blair 'machine' also gave us our first real taste of US style leadership in terms of the use of the media. The term 'spinning' soon became well known to us. We got to understand sound bites and simplified messages.
I don't think many of my countrymen and women would have much to diagree with what I have written so far. No doubt some will disagree with my precis of his achievements that follows, although I'm sure we will all agree that Iraq was and still is a disaster.
I think Labour have done an OK job but no more than any other governemnet would have done. The taxation burden has increased by stealth with little fiddles here and there. The headlines rates of personal taxation have not increased a lot and for many have fallen. But if you are 'comfortably' off the tax burden has increased in other ways. At the same time our public borrowing requirement has risen. Normally this has happened when taxes are falling. Bottom line is we have stored up problems for the future. The record on public services is, I believe, appalling. No one could argue that they have pumped billion of pounds into them but this money has not been invested wisely. We have wasted most of this investment in my view. I know this will be contentious to some but I am more than happy to argue this one out from my own knowledge of the health sector in particular. The other leagcy of the Blair years is one that was never included in any manifesto: we have effectively an open door policy for immigration from outside of the EU. This has had an impact upon our services, our infrastructure and in some cases lead to an increase in crime and terrorist activity. Like I have said many times here I welcome controlled immigration as it benefits our culture and our economy.
As for his successor, it will be Gordon Brown. They made a succession pact some time ago. I happen to dislike the guy even more than Blair and sincerely hope that Labour lose the next election. I do not trust Mr Brown one inch. The sad fact is that our opposition parties are still very weak so maybe he will win next time.
Again apologies for ruining your thread.