Poland's aid to Ukraine if Russia invades - part 14

They have a terrible record with wounded veterans... the general public doesn't want to look at them or remember they exist.

Ours are homeless and on drugs. Want pics?

Aggressor?
Russia didn't move to NATO. NATO moved to Russia.

Russian troops are in Russia or there is no such thing as self-determination.

Ukrainian troops invaded Russia and are the aggressor.

There is nothing dumber than Euro women. Facts don't matter. Laws don't matter. Only feelings...

BTW, where is the moron who claimed that moving kids out of harm's way was a war crime?

I was moved by the Germans out of harm's way - the harm that AK idiots created by playing stupid games with the Red Army.

Dear Germans, I really appreciate it.

Russel Bentley was an American who went to Ukraine to fight and was killed by his comrades.... an investigation with some details has been released.

x.com/prestonstew_/status/1837082935545004267

However, he fought on the russian side.

Yeah.... exactly he went to Ukraine to kill Ukrainians for russia and russians ended up torturing him to death.

Not so surprising...

There are NATO azholes who go to Russia to kill Russians.

They are lucky I am not the president of Russia. They would be executed on the spot.

Poor Russia. Even when they invade their neighbors (invade them for a third time in 10 years, btw), they are the victim.

Russia can't even enjoy attacking their neighbors and annexing their lands in peace without being targeted by nefarious plots against them.

Invading neighbors to create a buffer is a lot more excusable than invading places 10,000 miles away the invading army was clueless where and why on the day before the invasion.

A 64 year old man, there to help the North Nigerian cause. Tortured, sexually assaulted, his body desecrated and set on fire.

And yet people think the Ukrainians should negotiate with these criminals.

Instead of serving them raw like sushi, the US fried 200,000 Japs in August 1945.

They still love "America".

Try harder...

That is a very weak and poor comparison..... you need to try harder.... and anyway, Russians are far too cowardly to use nukes when they know that in an MAD scenario, everyone will lose, but the Russians would lose most.

"Try harder" as you like to say. After exchange of a full set of nukes, US will have parts of Nevada desert and possible a strip of livable land on the north (if Canada will be smart enough to not participate). Britain probably will have no clean lands with normal ecosystem at all. Russia will have quite big now inhabited Taiga and Tundra territories that can be quickly developed to host survivors.

PS: "Perimeter" system that will command retaliation strike is not coward, it is electronic...

India wants to sell 2,500 of its old T72 tanks. Will russia buy them? There has to be some way to stop that. Or what?

Who is going to buy rusty junk like that ? Only somebody who was desperate and didn't care about their soldiers would buy such a death trap.

T-72 is a versatile and dangerous weapon. Especially that it can be modernised quickly and at low cost (ask Ukrainians if they like PT-91 Twardy).

2500 of these tanks in Russian hands would definitely be something to worry about for Ukraine.

The Biden policy of defending russian military targets is going away...

Ukraine hits another big ammo depot, this time in Krasnodar (said to be stockpile for Nork ammo, most likely produced by slave labor)

x.com/motytchak/status/1837340781796859912

And they hit another spot in the Tver region...

x.com/TreasChest/status/1837311291624390765

It will make russophiles sad but that's a lot of weapons that won't be used to kill Ukrainians....

Google why are T72s so bad and you will get plenty of hits.

No doubt Indian tank commanders have seen those exploding turrets on YouTube

Still if the North Nigerians want to park 2000 of them at their permanent base, 8km from Pokrovsk, then they can do so.

Oh, look, the paint is peeling, says a moron...

Genius aka Novi: Z-P=0. Russia will win.

Win (def.) - Russia keeps C and D. U is not in NATO in the next 50 years.

Serbia will help itself, to Serbian world and to Slavic ie Sarmatian civilization.

Demonstration of Serbian military power puzzled region and wider.

Serbia gathered 6.000 soldiers, 2.500 pcs of armored vehicles and more then 50 aircraft, for the military maneuvers. By many, Serbian army is equipped above the NATO and Russian standards. Qualified for the best army in the world considering its size.



Racowie

Except they lose every battle they're in...

What battle Serbian army lost?

During Civil War in former Yugoslavia, Serbian army never was involved. Before that, well, enough to say that Serbia was main factor in destruction of both Austro-Hungaria and Ottoman Turkish Empire. In it, Serbian army played crucial role. Critical battles were won exactly by the Serbian army. Our army pursued AH army all the way to Vienna and Turkish army was broken in the Battle of Kumanovo, after which Turkish army in defeat, retreated from central Balkan behind the Bosporus. It also had its symbolism because first great battle in Europe for the Turks was the Kosovo Battle, Serbs vs. Turks where both leaders died and battle essentially was a drawn.

They have never won one. Centuries agonists irrelevant.

And this has noth8ng to do with r*SSia's illegal and unprovoked (and failing) invasion of Ukraine.

the wages of appeasement....

putain made a speech where he said that occupied Königsberg (aka kaliningrad) has to be with russia and there should be no impediment to movement between kaliningrad and mainland russia...

For some time there have been rumors of a hybrid operation in the Baltics that's been pushed back from June to late September....

x.com/poland24com/status/1837585848839426401

what is russia likely to try and how is NATO likely to respond?

Depends. If Russia does a full-scale invasion, they will answer it. Not with a full-blown western mobilization. However, I also don't think that Russia will be stupid enough to launch a full-blown invasion against NATO.

The best way for Russia to win against NATO is not to destroy NATO; it is to simply make NATO worthless. If they can make a good false flag and occupy a small village of mostly Ethnic Russians in Estonia and avoid being dragged in WW3, NATO Article 5 is worthless.

NATO and Ukraine did not invade Russia.Russia invaded Ukraine.Simple logic tells you who is in the wrong here.


HaHaHaHa! So true!


There will be very little left.......Russia would be so devastated that China and North Korea would invade..... Goodbye Russia!

@Crow

How many times do you have to be told?Serbia does not matter!


They won't because they would lose and they know it..... for God's sake they are struggling against Ukraine, even Poland on their own would massacre them, let alone with NATO aid! No,Russia will not attack a NATO country, even Russians are not THAT stupid!

I said 'hybrid operation' probably closer to what you said... occupy a village close to the border with a large russian population...

There are a considerable number of troops from other NATO countries currently in the Baltic region and I suspect that this would be very hard to do.

If there are contingency plans for the defence of anywhere, it's the Baltics, and especially the Suwałki Gap.

For all Russians and Russian boot lickers, watch this video and weep...... the signs are all there, Russia is going to lose the war in Ukraine.

Ikrainians - maybe. Enlighten us, where they live.

Are you a child?

Grow up man! Or do all Russians have no balls?