POLANDA : - powered by PolishForums   Classifieds [75] Off-Topic [334]
1389    

Off-Topicpage 8 of 47

US Presidential Elections 2016 - Poland's View



Harry
19 Oct 2016  #211

I must defend myself again with Hare's belittling comment.

Not at all, you could just provide some support for your laughable claim that "Obama got 110% of the votes while Mitt got 0% in that precinct in Pennsylvania in the last election". But you won't do that, because you know that you can't: even you know that you're lying when you make that ridiculous assertion and even you know that you've been caught yet again.

Lyzko
19 Oct 2016  #212

Oh, and now we're labeling Hillary an alternative simply because she wants to do some good??? What's next on the name game blame card, eh?

johnny reb
19 Oct 2016  #213

and now we're labeling Hillary an alternative

Why is she hiding the fact that she is a dyke ?

But you won't do that

You are right Hare, I don't have to defend my claims to someone to lazy to google it for themselves merely to argue because they have had to much to drink.

Your childish tactics are over Hare. lol

Lyzko
19 Oct 2016  #214

Those who label others may in fact be "one" of those themselves:-)

Harry
19 Oct 2016  #215

, I don't have to defend my claims to someone to lazy to google it for themselves merely to argue because they have had to much to drink.

No Johny, you don't want to defend your laughable claim because now it has become obvious to you just how laughable a claim that is. You can see that your latest life has been very clearly and very obviously exposed. So now you are trying to back away from that line and do so whilst throwing in a few insults. You are very simply utterly pathetic.

Of course you could just tell us the name of the Pennsylvania precinct where you claim that "Obama got 110% of the votes while Mitt got 0%". Why weren't you posted Johnny. Come on, post the name of the precinct you are talking about. And then I will link to the actual results of the precinct.

johnny reb
19 Oct 2016  #216

So now you are trying to back away from that line

Keep the rumors coming Hare, I love them.
I learn so much about myself that I never knew before.

may in fact be "one" of those themselves

Lyzzy, I assure you that I am not a dyke.
You seem a little femmy at times though.

Lyzko
19 Oct 2016  #217

"Femmy" = articulate, knowledgeable, engaging????

Do I detect a note of jealousy)))

What does that make the rank-and-file straight person? Boring, vulgar, rough??

TheOther
20 Oct 2016  #218

It's actually Owen Shroyer

The source is the Alex Jones Channel, genius.

No, do you?

You still don't get it, do you? Go to YouTube, search for "stupid GOP voter", and it will give you around 405,000 hits. There are idiots on both sides of the isle, but that is probably too complicated for you.

make a connection between this film about fascism and Trump

Of course. Just take a close look at his followers and how they act during campaign events. The only thing that's missing is the stretched out right arm.

I do ?

Yes, Trener. In my book you are a fuc*king PolAm Nazi. It's long overdue to ban you permanently (again).

Wulkan
20 Oct 2016  #219

The source is the Alex Jones Channel, genius.

Yes, he uses Alex Jones channel as he has over 1600000 subscriptions so he get get to the wider range of viewers in this important time.

Just take a close look at his followers and how they act during campaign events.

You mean they are polite and cultured and not violent unlike Hillary supporters?

In my book you are a fuc*king PolAm Nazi.

Nobody gives a **** what's in your book. You have no credibility whatsoever.

johnny reb
20 Oct 2016  #220

you will always be the xenophobic white nigger next door.

So Fabo Lamington, now we are name calling.
(Your new nick I just tagged you with, like it ?)
See, I can play that game too Bushie Boy. lmao
You never answered my question Abo Boy,

How can an immigrant be born outside his native country ?

Still waiting to hear your answer on that.

It's long overdue to ban you permanently.

Yeah yeah yeah, boo f*ucking hoo ...immigrants first.

What did ya think of the debate Lyzko ?

Harry
20 Oct 2016  #221

Still waiting to hear your answer on that.

The rest of us are still waiting for you to tell us the name of the Pennsylvania precinct where you claim that "Obama got 110% of the votes while Mitt got 0%". Come on Johnny, give us that name or an apology for your pathetic attempt.

johnny reb
20 Oct 2016  #222

Oh Oh OH MY........I must defend myself against Hare's accusations AGAIN !
Hare do us a favor and go jump in a deep lake.
I told you to go Google it if you doubt the jest of my statement.
Even if I did post the website you would want to split hairs (no pun intended) and be technical.
How many times have I told you, in America we speak in jest terms and not absolute technical phrases.
Since this is an American forum you need to go with American terminology and take your Brit Miss Proper and can it.
Now let your fingers do the walking and google it so you will shut up and quit making yourself look like an ass again.

What a debate last night aye.
I think Trump knows that he is done and just wants to expose Crooked Hillary's corruption at this point.
Seems that was his goal last night by pointing out that she should not even be allowed to run for Presidency after all the crimes that she has committed.

Clinton and Obama have been very weak leaders and now four more years of Obama should just about finish off America.
Iran now hates us, Russia now hates us, China now hates us, the EU hates and now the Philippines have called Obama a son of a ***** and told him to go to hell and to get out of their country.

The Philippines are now annexing with China.
And the stupid people of this Country STILL can't see how these Liberal Socialist's are destroying America and will vote for four more years for them.

All I can think of is how the frog was happy (at first) that he was put in a pot of warm water.

Harry
20 Oct 2016  #223

Hare do us a favor and go jump in a deep lake.

Yawn. Instead of resorting to the same old ad hom trolling that you always turn to, kindly provide the name of the Pennsylvania precinct where you claim that "Obama got 110% of the votes while Mitt got 0%". Or are you just too ashamed to admit that yet again you've been caught telling us lies?

johnny reb
20 Oct 2016  #224

yawn...........

Now let your fingers do the walking and google it so you will shut up and quit making yourself look like an ass again.

Have you ever been told you sound like a broken record Hare ? lol
and you will find that there was more than one precinct Hare.
Now ladies & gentleman let's get back on thread and you too Hare. :-)

Wulkan
20 Oct 2016  #225

Have you ever been told you sound like a broken record Hare ?

He does that because you are too soft with him.

Harry
20 Oct 2016  #226

you will find that there was more than one precinct

OK, so name just one precinct where "Obama got 110% of the votes while Mitt got 0%", just one.

Marsupial
20 Oct 2016  #227

And the latest obama achievement. ....handing the Phillipines to China. What a great cv he has. Clinton can expand on his legacy she will give Alaska back to russia.

Lyzko
20 Oct 2016  #228

Donald Trump showed his true colors last night as a dangerous megalomaniac MANCHILD, who is not only a sore loser but someone who doesn't appear to mind violating the rules of order or accepted protocall of presidential elections; once the game's over, it's over, no matter how disappointing the results!!

Harry
20 Oct 2016  #229

once the game's over, it's over, not matter how disappointing the results!!

No, not anymore, how people can just lie about the results afterwards, for example Johnny claiming that there are "more than one precinct " where "Obama got 110% of the votes while Mitt got 0%".

Lyzko
20 Oct 2016  #230

Harry, we're talking a presidential election for chrissakes, not a friggin' ball game!!!

Neither House Speaker Ryan, Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton are umpires crying foul at the drop of a cap, they're participants in a system, WITHIN a democratic system and each one's simply got to respect the process, or, go pack it in:-))

Ironside
20 Oct 2016  #231

Clinton and Obama have been very weak leaders

Not weak - ideologically anti-western civilization. They have been reducing American involvement and American influence in the world. Increasing importance of the second tier player like China and Russia on purpose not by mistake.

--

Lyzko
20 Oct 2016  #232

A Trump presidency certainly wouldn't strengthen America's role in the world, it would weaken it immeasurably!! With Trump instead of Clinton, we'd be electing a bully to rival yet another bully on the world stage, and his name is Vladimir Putin:-)

Again, Hillary's too intelligent for the average voter! Although she'll clearly win, if not by too much, she had to select a Tim Kaine as her VP, if for no other reason, if she'd gone with her gut and chosen Elizabeth Warren, this would've been a meeting of the Harvard Debating Society rather than a grass-roots choice who can "get down and dirty" with the people (.....and often, that's plenty dirty)!!

johnny reb
20 Oct 2016  #233

who doesn't appear to mind violating the rules of order or accepted protocall of presidential elections

Please expand on what you are referring to Lyzko ?
Do you mean when Trump called her a nasty woman (which she is) but the media went nuts on that.
I thought she is a feminist and wants equality.
If someone called a man a nasty man it would be no big deal. WTF !

OK, so name just one precinct where "Obama got 110% of the votes while Mitt got 0%", just one.

I told you to go Google it if you doubt the jest of my statement.

You are Britishly "confused" again Hare just like you were confused when Trumps wife said that he "raped" her.
You stuffy Brits take that LITERALLY while she meant it FIGURTIVITLY .......you trackin' with me now........
She then when on to explain that (which I patiently showed you where she did just that) and you got egg on your face again as you were being British again on an American Forum.

Same thing here Hare, 110% is just a figure of speech as in expression using words in nonliteral sense.
You still on the same page with me here Hare ?
Now don't make me google some website that will make you look even dumber so you have to apologize for calling me a liar.

johnny reb
20 Oct 2016  #234

Trump presidency certainly wouldn't strengthen America's role in the world,

Then why is one of his MAIN campaign promises to rebuild our military so America is safe again ?
Obama has ran it into the ground for a reason.

Although she'll clearly win,

By lying and committing crimes to do it.
Let's not forget the e-mails that proved what she did to beat Bernie.
You know Lyzko if it was for her husband Bill she would be a nobody.
No one would even know her because she has ever done anything great in her career.
In fact "everything" that she has done has been a failure.
Like Trump said, "you do no qualify to run for the presidency with your criminal past."

"get down and dirty"

We will hand that to her, she is one of the nastiest, evil, dirty, lying, underhanded, criminal that has ever ran for the office.

Lyzko
20 Oct 2016  #235

Hillary surely had her husband's help as Donald would doubtless be nowheresville without Papa Fred's million dollar check way back when!\:-)

johnny reb
20 Oct 2016  #236

Trump did great things with that million dollar check and turned it into BILLIONS.
Crooked Hillary has done NOTHING great that I can think of.
I can name some of her failures though.
Maybe you can name something that she has done that one would consider great.
I will go first, Benghazi lie that killed four Americans.
Your turn.

someone who doesn't appear to mind violating the rules of order or accepted protocall of presidential elections

Please explain that Lyzko.

peterweg
21 Oct 2016  #237

Trump did great things with that Biillion Rubles check

Fixed for you.

Harry
21 Oct 2016  #238

Now don't make me google some website that will make you look even dumber so you have to apologize for calling me a liar.

Go right ahead, Johnny, Google away, then give me the name of just one of the precincts where "Obama got 110% of the votes while Mitt got 0%". You claim that there were more than one, so name a precinct where "Obama got 110% of the votes while Mitt got 0%".

johnny reb
21 Oct 2016  #239

Harry, we're talking a presidential election for chrissakes, not a friggin' ball game!!!

You don't understand Lyzko, Hare's agenda is to try and make people defend themselves when he does not interpret of what is being conveyed unless it is in British lingo.

He REFUSES understand that figure of speech as in expression using words in nonliteral sense.
He does not WANT TO get it because if he did he would have no argument and that is what he wants so he can build up his self esteem.

After providing your explanation in detail he will STILL argue because he is CLUELESS to what nonliteral means.
That is his problem that drives us all nuts.

As the relentless mosquito comes back Repeating Repeating Repeating his question because he won't comprehend in fear of looking DUMB.

.......you trackin' with me now........

Nope, you just want to ARGUE by parroting.

Same thing here Hare, 110% is just a figure of speech as in expression using words in nonliteral sense.

Why doesn't that sink into your pickled brain Hare ?
But here, as you wipe the egg off your face AGAIN, please stay out of this thread now unless you want to stay on topic.

h4cblog.com/obama-gets-110-of-all-votes-in-many-districts

Happy now ? (Why do I doubt it) lol
Now before you come by trying to split hairs (no pun intended) please find an American to explain this to you.

110% is just a figure of speech as in expression using words in nonliteral sense.

Remember the analogy that I used trying to explain this to you ?

you were confused when Trumps wife said that he "raped" her.

I have gone on to explain that to you but you are just to "thick" to get it and just want to ARGUE and beat a dead horse.

Now run along and leave this thread for the big boys Hare because I am DONE arguing with you simply to argue.

Harry
21 Oct 2016  #240

obama-gets-110-of-all-votes-in-many-districts

No, I asked you to name one of the precincts where "Obama got 110% of the votes while Mitt got 0%". Kindly substantiate the claim you have repeatedly posted or apologize for lying to us.


PreviousNext
PF poster Sobieski - sad news [17]Essay Structure [8]


Off-Topic / US Presidential Elections 2016 - Poland's Viewtop