POLANDA : - powered by PolishForums   Classifieds [75] Off-Topic [334]
1389    

Off-Topicpage 9 of 47

US Presidential Elections 2016 - Poland's View



johnny reb
21 Oct 2016  #241

As the relentless mosquito comes back Repeating Repeating Repeating his question because he won't comprehend in fear of looking DUMB.

Hare just hang your head and wipe the egg off your red face.
I am not doing your homework for you Hare.
Now if you want the name of those 59 precincts then you can google them because I don't care.
Here is ANOTHER link to help solve your mystery.

philly.com/philly/news/politics/20121112_In_59_Philadelphia_voting_wards__Mitt_Romney_got_zero_votes.html

Maybe that link will help you narrow down the districts that you are looking for.
The article said something about these districts being in the upper north and west side of Philly.
Good luck with your search because you now own it.
If you don't want to apologize for calling me a liar then all of us here understand Egg Face.
Now for the love of Mary WOULD YOU PLEEZ STAY ON THREAD !!!!!!!!

johnny reb
21 Oct 2016  #242

Oh and before you b itch that you are being hung with a new rope Hare........
When I refer to a local voting district, ward, precinct, area, they are all ONE IN THE SAME in my nonliteral American lingo.

Did ya hear about Trump taking a break on his yacht in Italy.
He invited the Pope and the media to go with him for a little cruise.
The Pope's zucchetto blew off his head into the water and when Trump's crew went to lower a little boat to retrieve it Trump told them not to as he climbed down the ladder, walked across the water and retrieved it for the Pope.

They were all amazed to say the least.
Immediately there was speculation how the media was going to report this.
The next day the headlines in the media read: TRUMP CAN'T SWIM

Harry
21 Oct 2016  #243

those 59 precincts

Those are precincts in which Romney got zero votes. You have been told to name even a single precinct where "[b]Obama got 110% of the votes [B]while Mitt got 0%". Name one or be exposed yet again as a pathetic liar.

Ziemowit
21 Oct 2016  #244

you were confused when Trumps wife said that he "raped" her. You stuffy Brits take that LITERALLY while she meant it FIGURATIVETLY

He [Harry] REFUSES understand that figure of speech as in expression using words in nonliteral sense.

I have gone on to explain that to you but you are just to "thick" to get it

That's what I thought about it, too. I also thought that Harry has some difficulty in grasping the proper sense of relatively simple English phrases, so I decided to recommend him a book to read so as he could practice his English skills. The book was carefully chosen and was about dining out in Warsaw - something that Harry is particularly fond of. For some obscure reasons, however, my post containing the cover page of the book with the title and the name of the author was erased from this thread and later on I couldn't even find it in the off-topic bin.

Schade, wirklich schade, as the book may have proved very useful to Harry in developing his English skills.

johnny reb
21 Oct 2016  #245

How did I know that even hanging him with a new rope wouldn't satisfy him. lol

be exposed yet again as a pathetic liar.

You are the one that has been exposed as the pathetic liar Hare.
What part of NONLITERAL do you not understand ????????
Here, one more time, the media uses nonliteral English also as you can see here.

h4cblog.com/obama-gets-110%-of-all-votes-in-many-districts[/b]

Harry has some difficulty in grasping the proper sense of relatively simple English phrases,

I thought he claims to be a former English teacher ?
HOW could an REAL English teacher not be aware of this ?
More like he just doesn't want to apologize to me for calling me a liar as he wipes the egg from his face.

Lyzko
21 Oct 2016  #246

@Johnny,

Since at least over the past one-hundred-fifty years or so, the winner assumes the Office, the loser concedes (not necessarily always graciously, but concede he has nonetheless!), PERIOD!!

What sort of example would the US set as Leader of the "Free World", if Trump heaven forbid refuses to concede like the gentleman his isn't (in fact, never was) and this then unleashes untold violence throughout the country??!

We're supposed to have not only grown up since our cowboys/Indian roots where the need for such gun-toting tactics is no longer necessary, we're allegedly different from many countries with their bloody coupes every two years, and violent seizures of power:-)

What hypocrites we've become if we can't even sustain the example we preach to the rest of the planet!

Harry
21 Oct 2016  #247

You are the one that has been exposed as the pathetic liar Hare.

Johnny, instead of trying to insult me, why don't you name one of the precinct where you claim "Obama got 110% of the votes while Mitt got 0%"? Or is the problem that you were very simply lying when you make that laughable claim and now you're sore that somebody called you out on your lie?

Lyzko
21 Oct 2016  #248

Don't mind Johnny, Harry! He's clearly a disillusioned ex-lefty right-winger Trump supporter who's arguing from frustration, therefore from weakness, because the US's goin' down the tubes:-)

Whether Hillary's the one to fix it remains to be seen. One thing's for sure, Donald ain't the answer either, not by a long shot.

As the painfully naive German public at large (including the top army brass) believed Hitler would solve their problems, getting even some ultra-naive German JEWS to superficially go along with him on certain things, they all soon found that rather than solve problems, he would create bigger ones than the world ever dreamed of...not to mention a "Final Solution", just in case the latter thought that serving in WWI, winning an Iron Cross and being best buddies with the Kaiser would earn them special favors!!!LOL

Trump's a loser from start to finish and Hillary's just the gal to best him in the fight of their lives.

Crow
21 Oct 2016  #249

Very good to know that extreme Muslim mafia lobby stays behind Clinton family

an article >>>

Thaci: Clinton likely to win, Albanians, vote for her

Thaci also said he was pleased that "many Albanians in the U.S. support Clinton."


Harry
21 Oct 2016  #250

Don't mind Johnny, Harry! He's clearly a disillusioned ex-lefty right-winger Trump supporter who's arguing from frustration,

I don't mind him at all, at least as far as it's possible to not mind vile racists who like to boast about how much they enjoy abusing women (sorry, I mean Johnny, not Trump), but what I want is for him to name just one precinct where "Obama got 110% of the votes while Mitt got 0%". Just one. Or admit he's been caught telling yet another pathetic lie.

Wulkan
21 Oct 2016  #251

enjoy abusing women (sorry, I mean Johnny, not Trump)

Oh I thought you was on about Clinton

Crow
21 Oct 2016  #252

i hope that Poles in USA won`t vote for Clinton. It would be abominable

Wulkan
21 Oct 2016  #253

i hope that Poles in USA won`t vote for Clinton.

Vast majority won't. My whole family votes for Trump.

Crow
21 Oct 2016  #254

Good. That is really good.

Lyzko
21 Oct 2016  #255

Plenty of ignorant Jane & Joe six-pack types out there in la-la-land still believe that Trump will deliver!

Boy, are they ever in for a rude awakening:-)

Any senior who expects a continuation of Medicure or Social Security will simply be put on ice. A hard-working citizen who deserves to have his many years of service compensated at the end of his or her working life will doubtless be forced to move south to the boonies if they're either not clever (or, usually crooked) enough to have played the markets....

Not a pretty picture, folks, and contrary to what the Limbaughs and Hannity's out there tell you, with Trump, there won't be fewer shooting rampages and violence, there'll be more, lots more.

Wulkan
21 Oct 2016  #256

with Trump, there won't be fewer shooting rampages and violence, there'll be more, lots more.

Doesn't matter, the globalists won't have the puppet, that's what matters.

Lyzko
21 Oct 2016  #257

?? What does globalism have to do with it? If you're saying though that globalism has contributed to the worsening economy and social peace, I'd have to roundly concur. However to insinuate as you seem to be doing that Clinton's the source of the problem's just flat WRONG!!!

While Bill began this ever so regrettable trend with NAFTA, Hillary's her own woman (despite her husband's assistance) and will follow a course of action which will not send jobs overseas, but keep them here and compensate ALL workers for their labors, even if the owner's not completely satisfied with the job.

For those out there who talk about "The Softening of America", there IS a middle ground, you know:-) Somewhere, there exists in a democracy such as ours a happy medium between Hitler or Putin and yippy-dippy, kumbaya-singing, handholding space cadetsLOL

Wulkan
21 Oct 2016  #258

If you're saying though that globalism has contributed to the worsening economy and social peace, I'd have to roundly concur.

At least you understand that Hillary is the globalists puppet, always something for a start.

Lyzko
21 Oct 2016  #259

Wrong again, you misunderstood what I posted! I never said that Hillary is a "globalist puppet" etc., quite the contrary:-) Trump's the one who talks out of both sides of his mouth and his bumhole!

Wulkan
21 Oct 2016  #260

Talking with is a waste of time, you are either trolling or just very dumb. Go and watch some CNN, it's good for your level.

Lyzko
21 Oct 2016  #261

....a high level indeed, Wulkan. Good for you to bone up on YOUR English (in which you continue to make numerous basic errors)!

Look up the meaning of "troll" as well, while you're at it!
:-)

johnny reb
21 Oct 2016  #262

if Trump heaven forbid refuses to concede

Lazko if he would have said yes the headlines would have read, "Trump concedes".
He was a genius to say what he did which was, "wait and see."

if Trump heaven forbid refuses to concede like the gentleman his isn't (in fact, never was) and this then unleashes untold violence throughout the country??!

I wonder why that theory did not happen when Gore refused to concede ??????

because the US's goin' down the tubes

That is why we so desperately need Trump, Obama and Hillary have sold us out.

senior who expects a continuation of Medicure or Social Security will simply be put on ice

We already have with zero increase last year and .03% this year under the Obama Clinton term.
That is .03% in the last two years, how can it get any worse Lyzko ?

there won't be fewer shooting rampages and violence

How could there be more as Obama and Clinton have did NOTHING to curb them while they rose under their term.
Are you nuts ?

However to insinuate as you seem to be doing that Clinton's the source of the problem's just flat WRONG!!!

REALLY Then explain how Clinton lost $6 BILLION DOLLARS !
You call that responsible and not a problem ?
Republican pollster Frank Luntz says Donald Trump hit the bull's-eye during the debate when he attacked Hillary Clinton for "losing" $6 billion while at the State Department.

msn.com/en-us/money/markets/opinion-how-did-hillary-clinton-lose-dollar6-billion-at-the-state-department/ar-AAjcjg4?li=BBnbfcN&ocid=U348DHP

Deny that Lyzko, or better yet ignore that FACT like you have all the rest of them that I have brought up in this thread.

Please explain to us what happened to this $6 Billion if you are so smart.

Lyzko
21 Oct 2016  #263

Gore isn't a nut job, that's why!

johnny reb
21 Oct 2016  #264

I want

Sh*t in one hand and want in the other and see which one fills up the quickest Hare.
I can explain it to you but I can't make you understand it.
Now please stay on thread before someone sets you on fire.

johnny reb
21 Oct 2016  #265

Gore isn't a nut job, that's why!

Got it Lyzko, the Democrats are justified in doing it but if a Republican even "suggests" of doing it he gets a sentence to hell. lol

Isn't that a bit hypocritical old boy ?
Oh and before we forget about the $6 BILLION that Crooked Hillary "misplaced".
And then Crooked Hillary makes a statement to the press in public that it takes 4 minutes to ready a nuke to be launched by the U.S.A.

You call this NUT JOB RESPONSIBLE !
My gosh man, deny those two facts son.
Tell us your take on these two issues Lyzko...... please as we are waiting.
She is hardly Presidential material.

Lyzko
21 Oct 2016  #266

Her demeanor is far more presidential than Trump's ever was or could be!!

What respectable figure allows "locker-room banter" to infiltrate public discourse???! FDR never did, nor did Ike, JFK, even LBJ (...whose sometimes lewd "toilet talks" were STRICTLY off limits to all but certain male journalists from his inner sanctum):-)

So much for double standard!

johnny reb
22 Oct 2016  #267

But Lyzko, we are not debating "Demeanor", we are debating Crooked Hillary's irresponsibility.
Gosh Lyzko, you seemed to have side stepped my questions AGAIN.
The missing $6 BILLION
The telling the world that it takes 4 minutes to ready a nuclear launch by the U.S.A.
The private e-mail server she used to cover her tracks that exposed America's security.

Her demeanor is far more presidential

LMFAO.........PaLEEZE !
And you call that kind of irresponsibility "Presidential Material" ?
Now come on Lyzko, what is YOUR opinion on those two issues.
Where do you think that $6 BILLION ended up ?

Wulkan
22 Oct 2016  #268

Gosh Lyzko, you seemed to have side stepped my questions AGAIN.

He is doing it on purpose, he is just trolling.

johnny reb
22 Oct 2016  #269

Lazko has done it throughout this whole thread.........
Liberals can not debate the truth........it confuses them so they just change the subject like Lyzko does.
I mean what possible explanation can he have for Crooked Hillary losing $6 BILLION DOLLARS or WHY she made public to the world that it takes 4 minutes to lunch a nuke by the U.S.A. ????????

Very incompetent and not at all Presidential material.
Did you notice how clammy her skin looked in the last debate ?
She isn't looking healthy at all.
Donald Trump gained on Hillary Clinton among American voters this week, cutting her lead nearly in half

Wulkan
22 Oct 2016  #270

I mean what possible explanation can he have for Crooked Hillary losing $6 BILLION DOLLARS or WHY she made public to the world that it takes 4 minutes to lunch a nuke by the U.S.A. ????????

That's the whole point, if they never mentioned that in the mainstream media then he has no clue and start to troll.


PreviousNext
PF poster Sobieski - sad news [17]Essay Structure [8]


Off-Topic / US Presidential Elections 2016 - Poland's Viewtop