Barney
16 Apr 2014 #631
I accept the tape as genuine and think Tymoshenko was angry and said a silly thing.
Yes I accept the tape as genuine I have said that several times.
You challenged my evidence by making a concrete claim ie saying the recording is edited the onus is on you to prove your assertion. That's how things work, you have been nailed telling a lie and are now squirming to get out of it.
You can listen to the recording and make your own mind up whether you believe it or not is not important, once you make a concrete statement you need to be able to support it.
You said the tape was edited prove it was or it remains a lie.
So you want us to believe that her word is worthless
For verification purposes yes it is worthless because she is involved in the dispute.
Harry none of this is rocket science its very basic stuff.
You claimed that the recording was edited are you now also claiming it's not her voice? Good god man this conspiracy gets more intricate by the day, I cant wait until you weave 9/11 JFK and the moon landings into the mix.
So far you have offered tweets and some ridiculous speculation that contradicts her, you cooked up a conspiracy that involved two channels and crystal clear sound and other nonsense. She says that the vast majority is genuine only a tiny bit is in dispute. I'm not sure where you are going with this conspiracy you seem to be saying its not her voice now is that correct?