POLANDA : - powered by PolishForums Classifieds [69] Off-Topic [220]
1,466    

Off-Topicpage 7 of 49

USA News and Poland - Part 1



Rich Mazur
13 Apr 2019  #181

You went too far back. There is no such thing as "Native Americans". Everybody came from somewhere else. "Native Americans" included.

Slavery was not a white invention. Somebody else in Africa had to own them first before they were sold to the white plantation owners. Those were other blacks.

Where you are spot on is the US playing the world cop. They do it because it's a money machine for the American ruling class. They need action. Any action, anywhere. Without that, it's hard to justify the American military budget being almost equal to the combined military expenses of all the remaining countries. The sore losers are, of course, the American taxpayers. The winners: the Euro weasels who are very happy to be on the US military welfare as it relieves them of this burden.

How this American corrupt machine works - while simple and devilish at the same time - cannot be covered in a forum like this one.

Just one factoid: in its entire history, the US was in a state of war 90 percent of the time. Now, it has 175,000 military personnel in over 150 countries. A record unmatched by anyone.

Shitonya Brits
13 Apr 2019  #182

Formally they are called Tribal Nations.

They entered into formal treaties with the United States and their reservations are within US territory.

"Indians", "Native Americans" or whatever term someone wants to use also practiced slavery. Not only along with the British but for centuries before then and throughout North, Central and South America.

It's hard to believe (since it is never talked about) but the largest and most brutal slavery occurred in the Caribbean (mostly British colonies) and Brazil.

Rich Mazur
13 Apr 2019  #183

Formally they are called Tribal Nations.

This is going to be a rhetorical question: If they are "Nations" - and presumably "proud" - why the f*** are they on my welfare, unemployed and drunk all day long?

Jedynaczyk
13 Apr 2019  #184

Look at the whole Assange situation now and how America is sending forces inside ambassies:
forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2019/04/12/julian-assange-can-expect-the-full-5-years-in-american-jail--heres-why/?ss=cybersecurity#254b5e165a43

Lyzko
13 Apr 2019  #185

The Native Americans aka "Indians" were the aboriginal inhabitants of the entire New World.
When Irish monks, led by St.Brendan, made it over across the Atlantic, they were followed by the Vikings,
obviously long before Columbus persuaded his King and Queen to lend him the funds to undertake his now
stored journey to disprove the Earth's flatness:-)

By the time 1620 or so rolls around, there had already been extensive European settlement on the North American continent.
"They", meaning the non-European, original denizens of later America, were deemed unworthy of being considered as much
as humans, as they weren't Christians until converted. They were treated shamefully by the settlers, by both the Spanish and
the English!

We all know the rest of the whole tragic story. Ineluctable as the fate of the conquered indeed was, what has made it worse has

been the systematic attempt by "white" history books to constantly demonize "the other" and make it appear as though some-
how the concept of 'Manifest Destiny' is completely justified, simply because the settlers were white, above all Protestant, Christians,
and the Tribal Nations weren't.

As in the Crusades, anyone who didn't believe in Christ The Redeemer was doomed to remain a heathen.

Jedynaczyk
13 Apr 2019  #186

They are poor and on we,dare because they get deploid of all resources and the best land and forxes to go to american schools and be westernized and indoctrinated when it goes against their entire values and culture. thrir culture is to be nomadic and live off their land.

Rich Mazur
13 Apr 2019  #187

...and ride horses in New York?

...make it appear as though somehow the concept of 'Manifest Destiny' is completely justified

Nothing personal, but it so ironic to see liberals fawning over Darwin when the creation is discussed. Magically, they fall out of love with that adorable man when the existential race relations are the subject.

The American Indians were free to go to Europe, destroy the white culture, their cathedrals, castles, universities, burn their books and paintings, but they didn't because when the whites had all of those, the Indians had 6-foot, single-room wigwams and no concept of the wheel.

Yeah, nature is a bi*tch: she hates vacuum - the gas type and cultural.

pawian
13 Apr 2019  #188

they didn't because when the whites had all of those, the Indians had 6-foot, single-room wigwams and no concept of the wheel.

And now the whites are going to be flooded and eventually subdued by human garbage, as you call them. Yes, nature hates vacuum - some people call it karma. :):)

Rich Mazur
13 Apr 2019  #189

There is no vacuum in the US or Europe. And it's not karma. Just the evil leftists like Soros and the useful idiots like the average brainless, feel-good liberal. You can see them screaming for open borders, more migrants, free education and medical care for every scum on mother earth. And, of course, against ICE / ice.gov. Money? What money?

No vacuum. No karma. Just a-holes.

pawian
13 Apr 2019  #190

There is no vacuum in the US or Europe. Just the evil leftists like Soros and the useful idiots like the averag

If migrants eventually take the upper hand, it will mean there was huge vacuum. Wasn`t it you and Dirk claiming the white race is slowly falling into oblivion because whites bear only 1.9 child per marriage?

I hope you understand the approaching depopulation of the white race is partly caused by white supremacist theories, among others the one about their natural superiority over women. In protest, the latter refuse to bear children to white supremacists and hence less children are born.

Vlad1234
13 Apr 2019  #191

Thanks. Abbreviation ICE is also often used for Internal Combustion Engine.

delphiandomine
13 Apr 2019  #192

In protest, the latter refuse to bear children to white supremacists and hence less children are born.

Very, very true. For all the claims of such people, the facts remain that women aren't interested in incels.

Rich Mazur
13 Apr 2019  #193

Wasn`t it you and Dirk claiming the white race is slowly falling into oblivion because whites bear only 1.9 child per marriage?

The reasons for that 1.9 are (1) men lost their manufacturing jobs that went to Mexico and China and now make less flipping burgers, (2) women have to go to work to supplement family income and, thus, have fewer babies, (3) abortion.

Without (3), there would be 50,000,000 more Americans today and we would not need 20,000,000 of the Latino garbage to fill THAT vacuum. It was the liberals like you who did it to the US and now are telling us how we need more people, a-holes.

This reminds me of the case where the sob who murdered his parents was pleading for leniency because he was an orphan..

pawian
13 Apr 2019  #194

women have to go to work to supplement family income and, thus, have fewer babies, (3) abortion.

Women successfully demanded abortion to stop being treated like child farms by white supremacists. Yes, they have to go to work, that was the price for their liberation. But if white supremacists helped their poor wives cope with all house duties, especially child care, on equal basis, I am sure women would be less prone to abort their pregnancies. Do you really think it is such fun for a female to have an abortion? No, they do it because they see how their useless white supremacist husbands/partners don`t give a shyt when they come back home after work and only expect to be taken care of by their women.

It is you, white supremacists, who are to blame for the current pitiful condition of the white race.

It was the liberals like you who did it to the US and now are telling us how we need more people, a-holes.

Please, relax. We can converse without insults, can`t we? :):)

pawian
13 Apr 2019  #195

money machine for the American ruling class. Without that, it's hard to justify the American military budget being

You sound as if you were critical about it. Don`t forget that American military budget is largely spent on new weapons which require new technologies. They are made in the USA. Isn`t it beneficial for Americans to develop and produce armament (bought by the US army and also exported worldwide) which allows them to keep good jobs and receive decent salaries?

That is why you shouldn`t complain about the vast military spending in the USA as it prevents the following situation:

men lost their manufacturing jobs that went to Mexico and China and now make less flipping burgers,


Rich Mazur
13 Apr 2019  #196

pawian, your sick and actually stupid posts make it impossible to carry on. Yes, I should be happy to see our federal deficits over a trillion a year and our debt over 22 trillions to employ people. Just like the idiots who claim that wars are good for economy. Check your house for radon.

I always knew that liberals are morons, and that teachers are the worst among them. The real drama is that you have access to the kids.

pawian
14 Apr 2019  #197

your sick and actually stupid posts make it impossible to carry on

Oops, don`t let emotions carry you away so that you can`t carry on. :)

I should be happy to see our federal deficits over a trillion a year and our debt over 22 trillions to employ people.

How much of this deficit has been caused by pure military spending and wasted irretrievably? Second question : How much money has America earned by being a superpower present in so many regions of the world?

Before you answer, read this:
politico.com/magazine/story/2017/01/why-it-pays-to-be-the-worlds-policemanliterally-214605

One of many quotes:
The defense budget, [...], allows Washington to pump a massive stimulus into the economy every year without triggering another Tea Party.

Ok, so you want to reduce employment in armament industry so that American males earn less flipping burgers?

I always knew liberals are morons, and that teachers are the worst among them. real drama is that you have access to the kids.

Yes, I am only a mediocre teacher but still I can see you are furious because you are being nailed to the wall and can`t help it. Infantile reaction, I must say. I really expected more from such a renowned scientist as you. :)

Rich Mazur
14 Apr 2019  #198

We are done. From now on, you will be wasting your time.

pawian
14 Apr 2019  #199

Hey, did I say anything offensive to or about you? Come on....

Rich Mazur
20 Apr 2019  #200

I don't cut-and-past. So, with the mod's forgiveness, I would like to do it now rather than re-phrase it and pretend I am the author.

From mediaite.com/trump/noam-chomsky-calls-dem-focus-on-russia-a-huge-gift-to-trump-they-may-have-handed-him-the-next-election/

...the Trump-hating Democrat propagandist Media decided to coordinate with the DNC, Hillary campaign, DOJ and FBI in an attempted Coup of Trump's presidency by the Obama executive branch by using Russia interference ("collusion/conspiracy") as their central narrative. We now know that is what happened -- and the Media's credibility has been destroyed for the foreseeable future. Tens of millions of Americans now have a legitimate reason to believe the most of the Media are the "enemy of the American people" After all, we were gaslighted by them for over two years into believing our President was a traitor. If that's not an enemy, what is?

The best one-paragraph summary of what happened in full view of the hostile to the US world and the assorted, individual, factless and mindless Trump haters.

Ziemowit
20 Apr 2019  #201

The real drama is that you have access to the kids.

The real drama is that you have access to the internet.

Rich Mazur
20 Apr 2019  #202

I couldn't agree with you more. This s*** is addictive. Add PF and you are hooked for life.
BTW, I do appreciate your attention and your comments - as hostile as they may be. My internet addiction made me 100% immune to such things, so you should never feel bad.

You see, my feelings cannot ever be hurt because I have none other than the all-consuming hate for the leftists. On the hate scale, I hate them more as enablers than the illegal Latino scum they enable.

I hope this explains my behavior here.

Ziemowit
20 Apr 2019  #203

I do appreciate your attention and your comments - as hostile as they may be.

But it wasn't meant as a hostile comment at all. It was meant as a kind of a 'Polish' joke. Not a very good one, perhaps, but still 'Polish' :-).

Rich Mazur
20 Apr 2019  #204

But it wasn't meant as a hostile comment

I know. That is why I wrote "your comments - as hostile as they may be". I meant in the future if you have an urge. I am cool with that.

I am for Trump, but I am getting tired of all those side freak shows that involve him.
What Trump seems to be forgetting is that there is a time to speak and a time to keep your mouth shut. Mostly shut under the rule that the less you say, the less the enemy has to spit back at you.

Joker
24 Apr 2019  #205

Today the Democratic Presidential Car Clown Show hit 20 Presidential candidates, and new circus record!

nationalreview.com/magazine/2019/03/25/the-2020-democratic-field-is-a-clown-car-show/#slide-1

babylonbee.com/news/endless-parade-of-2020-democratic-candidates-emerge-from-tiny-clown-car

townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2018/12/30/ready-the-clown-car-the-first-batch-of-democrats-are-ready-to-announce-their-2020-bids-n2538251

Trump should easily win over any of these clowns! lol






cms neuf
24 Apr 2019  #206

The democrats will win easily - there is only one state that Trump can plausibly take from them, tiny New Hampshire. Meanwhile there are 9 states where less than.a 3 percent swing will give them to the Democrats including some big ones. I am certain Dems will win NC and Florida and of the others - Ohio, Georgia, Pa, Michigan, Wisconsin etc then surely a few will go to the Dems who did well there in the mid terms.

Add to that that Trump has another 18 months in power during which time he will insult plenty more people then any of these 20 will beat him handsomely.

jon357
24 Apr 2019  #207

there are 9 states where less than.a 3 percent swing will give them to the Democrats

This is good news.

Add to that that Trump has another 18 months in power

He just can't help himself.

Rich Mazur
24 Apr 2019  #208

The democrats will win easily - there is only one state that Trump can plausibly take from them

And this will be good for those Americans who make 60 grand or less how?
Don't be shy or cryptic and assume we all know how to read English.

cms neuf
24 Apr 2019  #209

They will be safer Without an immature idiots in charge, they will be richer looking at the past economic records, they will have less deficit to fund in the future, they will have better public services.

Thats my guess but its not my election (or yours for that matter).

In 2016 Clinton got 3 million more votes and in 2020 the difference is going to be even bigger

Rich Mazur
24 Apr 2019  #210

They will be safer

From what?

they will have better public services.

What public services does a 60k-per-year guy need improved?

Thats my guess but its not my election (or yours for that matter).

You are right about that one. I don't vote not because I am a Russian in Moscow, but because I am not repeat stupid. Waste of gas.

Would you like to see my US passport again or are you blind and post by dictating?


PreviousNext
A bad omen for Christianity? Notre Dame fire. [251]Why AfD is the most important party in Germany [1,480]


Off-Topic / USA News and Poland - Part 1top