Can you write something that is your idea?
I already did, but PolAm stated that I "don't understand Americans", so... I quoted an American.
But Poland is the shining light of democracy?
Not under PiS. And I wouldn't go as far as saying "the shining light of democracy", but definitely much more democratic than RuSSia.
In a democracy, foreign affairs, including deporting illegal migrants, belong to the president, not judges.
The president can't be above the law or the Constitution (in a democracy, that is).
The starting and non-negotiable point is that we are running 800B of trade deficit. Unsustainable. Period.
First of all, explain it to me why trade deficit is "unsustainable" in the case of the US?:
theconversation.com/the-trade-deficit-isnt-an-emergency-its-a-sign-of-americas-strength-252466
"That is, a trade deficit can only arise if foreigners invest more in the U.S. than Americans invest abroad. In other words, a country can only have a trade deficit if it also has an equally sized investment surplus.
The U.S. is able to sustain a large trade deficit because so many foreigners are eager to invest here.
(...)
Why? One major reason is the safety of the U.S. dollar.
(...)
In return for our financial assets, we buy more German machines, Scotch whiskey, Chinese smartphones, Mexican steel and so on.
Blaming foreigners for the trade deficit, therefore, is like blaming the bank for charging a low interest rate. We have a trade deficit because foreigners willingly charge us low interest rates - and we choose to spend that credit.
(...)
This strong demand for U.S. assets also explains why Trump's last trade war in 2018 did little to close the trade deficit:
Tariffs, by themselves, do nothing to reduce foreigners' demand for U.S. dollars, stocks and bonds.
(...)
It's worth noting that no other country in the world enjoys a similarly sized investment surplus.
(...)
Rather than reviving U.S. manufacturing, Trump's extreme tariffs and erratic foreign policy are likely to instead
scare off foreign investors altogether and undercut the dollar's global role. That would indeed shrink the trade deficit - but only by eroding the very pillars of the country's economic dominance, at a steep cost to American firms and families."