75 Years of Israel and the War

They didn't have to invade Japan.

Deprived of imports Japan would surrender eventually. PH was about Japan being pis*ed off at the US for interfering with their plundering of other Asian countries.

Even if they didn't surrender, Japan was no longer a threat to the US. Selective conventional bombing would be enough to strip them of any ability to harm the US for decades.

When the US nuked H and N, there was nothing there of any military value. It was terrorism - pure and simple. And well deserved...so it's clear where I stand.

@Novichok
Japan was invaded (Iwo Jima) was considered Japanese soil (therefore holy and sacred to them)

Check out the bloodbath of that battle, then you can begin to understand why invasion of main Japanese islands wasn't wished for.

Mr. G, I wish I knew what you are trying to say.
What happened to simple declarative sentences...

@Novichok
Ill try to make it easier for you:

You not understand, it is complicated. Please don't share anything with me or us. It is 90% below anybody's dignity to read. You misunderstand most things and side with evil to fight other evil and try to paint it as a holy fight which is total BS for any educated&inteligent person on this forum regardless of sides or relations or background or knowledge level of English

@Novichok

I believe your proposal would have been untenable and most probably would have drawn out the conflict. But, I get what you're saying. Continuing to question the morality of dropping nukes in H and N is valid, IMO.

In regards to the current Israel-Paleatinian conflict, I think the appropriate historical lesson to be drawn from the Jap-US conflict of WWII is Whether or not Israel should occupy Gaza and how such an occupation should be shaped. The way the US occupied and shaped post-war Japan is a possible blueprint for Israel should it win and decide to occupy. Although, the differences between imperial Japan and Islamic Palestinian arabs are significant. If any of that makes any sense.

Passive tense? What kind of crap is that - in English or Polish?

Yes, it does. But there are similarities.

Both the Japs and Hamas were and are fanatics. Fanatics never surrender or see the evil in their ways. The only thing that works is overwhelming power combined with a staggering civilian loss. The US did just that. My only regret is that the US had only two and not much earlier. Killing civilians is how you win wars. It demoralizes the army and stops the flow of supplies.

The US was right to use the nukes in 1945 just as Israel is right in flushing fanatics from hospital basements in Gaza today. There is no other way.

Hey, Mr. G, is there anything in this post that is wrong, illogical, or unclear?

Agreed-there are similarities as well as difference. Fanaticism being one.

....and Japan wasn't supported by outside allies after Berlin fell.

Hamas on the other hand is bought and paid for by Teheran and Co....also the main manipulators are sitting wealthy and safely in Dubai and Doha.

Just nuking this special snake's head would be difficult!

Good point, Beebs.

I hope and pray nuking isn't in the Israeli cards. That would be more damaging than helpful for Israel. Besides, they don't need to do such a thing.

Agreed!

Nuking would be a point when I know the enemies are overwhelming me and I'm going to die but I want to take as many of you with me. When I have to die, you will die to! And afterwards nobody will be able to live in that holy land anymore! My revenge from the grave!

So yes, I hope and think the IDF is better than that and will show them again where the frog has the curls, as so often before.

I would never suggest THAT!
What Israel is doing is making Gaza uninhabitable and in the process driving a wedge between civilians and the Hamas terrorist wing.
That's the stick. The question is: Where is the carrot?
In Japan, after two sticks, the US made Japan a better place than it was before they went stupid in 1941.

They have always implied that they would never carry out a first strike.

@Bratwurst Boy

Exactly.


Phew! I thought for a second you were, which isn't what I'd expect from you. You desire peace more than anything.

@jon357

Yeah, and I think it's a non-starter for the Israelis, unless they are put in the position BB described.

If it ever happens, the last place they'll drop on is there. Iran however is a less unlikely target.

@jon357

Agreed!

Learn simple English.

Iran is a more likely target.

Iran, after all, is the reason they have them and of course one of the main threats to world security in general.


Yawn...

Yes, genius, China, India, Japan, and Russia are shaking in their boots ... so scared. Oh, and Africa, Central America, North America, South America, Europe, and Australia. They all are on special meds ... trembling...

What a moron...

Iran is going to come in. Are there is nothing anyone can do.

I'd say that there is plenty, and that Israel have gamed all possible scenarios over decades.

Is this some new mental disorder? Saying something and nothing at the same time...

twitter.com/sentdefender/status/1724136241317265544/photo/1

twitter.com/sentdefender/status/1724136241317265544

....so....where to next? :)

@Bratwurst Boy

The tunnels, that's where the sh!t is going to get thick.

Pump gas.

And that's where the feckers are keeping hostages.

Just the mental disorder that you think 6 million Jews died in the holocaust and I want to have a catholic burial and don't want my penis mutilated by Jewish urologist who want my temple and my body to support Zionist Israel.

Do you think otherwise?


Circumcision is indeed a useless and often harmful practice however it is not unique to any one faith.


You'll get what you're given, unless you plan and pay for it. Not that it makes a difference either way.

I am sure those two connect. I just don't know how.

@jon357

Yes. Hence the sh!t gets really thick.

@call1n

You might be scandalized to know that there are many circumcised Catholics. In America it's common practice at birth to cut the foreskin.