@jon357
Loudest of what group? Conservatives? Definitely not. No neo nazi group has elected members in any middle to high ranking positions in state or federal government positions. There's a documentary online about a reporter spending time with some neo Nazi group I forget if it was the KKK or NSM or some other group but anyway one guy was upset because he couldn't even win enough votes to manage the local county water department. Their numbers are tiny and most of them are methhead loser high school dropouts who live in trailers or their moms basement - just like antifa.
Atleast no one complains though that the alt right smell like BO. Apparently not showering and being unhygienic is common amongst antifas. So many bystanders note how bad they smell whereever they seem to show up. Maybe this is their form of chemical warfare or a psychological thing? Be as smelly, disgusting, unshaven and unshowered as possible to bring more effect prior to attacking innocent people just as they did in Illinois, Wisconsin, California, Seattle, and plenty more cities. I doubt neo Nazis represent even a whole 5% of all conservatives/republicans in the US. Yet you foolishly equate neo Nazis with general trump supporters/conservatives/republicans/etc which is the furthest thing from the truth. That would be as dumb as if I said that antifa is the most vocal and prolific of the democrats. Idiotic isn't it? Or if perhaps I said thanks to Sanders success early in the presidential campaigns and continuing popularity , antifa has become more vocal and attacked more conservatives than in the past.(I think he had a good chance even beating trump but unfortunately the subversive, lying, cheating democrats swooped Sanders' success down from under him which has been proven in the Wikileaks dump. Bunch of backstabbing savages in suits.) The fact is though BLM and Antifa are funded by Soros who has a fetish for subversive destruction action and ruining countries and dividing them as much as possible amongst political and racial lines. He is a master of divide and conquer unlike anyone else living today. What's funny though is several BLM members went public because they were upset they didn't receive the $5,000 they were promised from a Soros funded org for causing rioting in Ferguson.
Furthermore, hardly anyone gives a crap about the far right 99% of the time and the only reason they're in the news now is because one member killed an innocent girl. Otherwise it's antifa who's constantly in the news, including now since they definetely weren't innocent in VA. Actually there's a lot of video evidence online that shows the rally from beginning to end and it's clear violence didn't start till antifa and blm showed up. Antifa and BLM have been in the news regularly for the past year due to their destruction of property, mayhem caused in California, assaulting innocent people, shutting down speakers who were INVITED to speak at universities, terrorizing innocent people, attacking people just for wearing a MAGA hat or shirt, and even using weapons like bats, mace, glass bottles, etc. against people. Antifa ALWAYS comes dressed in armor and with weapons to any event with conservatives for the sole purpose of picking a fight with them.
Most conservatives came to hear a speech or see some politician or perhaps even protest. The antifa comes to fight and shut down a speech or rally which is a direct assault on freedom of speech and freedom of assembly - that's the difference - conservatives have respect for the constitution and respect far left people to hoist ussr or stalin flags. Not antifa though - they spit on free speech and freedom of assembly and do whatever they can to cause enough violence to shut down a speaker or event they disgaree with. They even chant SHUT IT DOWN as they're assaulting innocent people. You'll see this same B.S. happen again very soon I guarantee it. Just wait till another conservative speaker is INVITED to a college campus or trump holds a rally. Antifa will come UNINVITED packing armor and weapons ready to battle with any conservative that's there - especially if they're wearing a MAGA hat or shirt regardless if they're just standing there or walking.
They will attack anyone who has an ideological position different than theirs - kind of like you - only you do it with words instead of violence which is good at least. However, instead of attempting to gain a real unbiased objective understanding of the other side's view, having an open honest dialogue and coming to a middle ground, you refuse to do so and stick to your ideology 100% even going as far as not condemning violence from groups that the far left protects - like radical muslims, blm cop killers, and black gangs who kill thousands. That's rather ignorant because your bias is preventing you from gaining an objective understanding of normal conservatives and the violence and terrorism the aforementioned groups cause which again, is exponentially higher than any neo Nazis.
You also fail to realize though that waving a Nazi flag isn't illegal, the far right had the proper permits which the ACLU helped them obtain, so they definitely had everything in order. Yes it's stupid and I think waving it's digusting but nonetheless such speech is protected. By assaulting a person waving such a flag you are spitting on the constitution's free speech and freedom of assembly. You and the left prefer to censor such things but regardless of your feelings such speech and assembly is protected. The USSR and stalin flags offend me but that doesn't mean that I'd attack them and I would condemn anyone who did attack a person waving such a flag because that's promoting totalitarianism, elimination of free speech, assembly, etc. which you FAIL to do. That's awfully biased and unobjective. =
Furthermore you refuse to condemn violence and terrorism unequivocally. I really thought you were better than this man. I'm not saying that to be mean because I respect your points of view and enjoy debating with you but this entire time you're refusing to condemn violence and terrorism equally regardless of who causes it. You come up with excuses on why you won't do it and why you keep going on and on about the far right guys. You say that 'well this is what's in the news now - this is what's trending.' Not true in the least bit - this whole past week stories ranging from Islamic terror massacring people in Burkina Faso, radical muslims driving cars into French soldiers who were deployed thanks to the 2 year state of emergency caused by muslims who torch entire neighborhoods and caused millions of dollars of damage to property. Kind of like the way antifa destroyed buildings and cars in California and their leader publicly states he and his group don't believe that damaging property and committing arson is violent nor a morally bad thing to do. If you're going to be so upset about terrorism and violence you shouldn't focus on just one group that does the least amount of it. You ought to be objective and unbiased enough to condemn ALL forms of it - especially the ones who cause the highest death tolls. Namely radical muslims and black gangs. Like I said, black gangs kill more people in a summer month in just my city alone than all white nationals in the entire us have killed in the past 20 years. Not to mention the muslims which kill exponentially more people than black gangs.
Then you attack me for 'relativizing.' Well yes, if we want to bring down murders, terrorism, and violence in significant amounts not only in the us but around the whole world we ought to look who causes the most deaths. That would be undoubtedly be radical Muslims and gangs. Actually it seems like the Muslims were the first to drive cars into masses of people like in England and now just recently again (about 4-5 days ago) in Paris. Absolutely no condemnation of their violence and terrorism despite the fact that they killed far more people than that one guy in VA. If we're to tackle issues whether it's combating global warming, bringing down murder rates, etc. people look for how to make the biggest different and look who or what causes the majority of provlems associated with a certain issue. With global warming its cars perhaps (honestly I don't know just using that as an example) and with deaths and murders it's definitely black gangs and muslim terrorists. If you want to bring down the murder rate significantly, not just in the us but around the world, we ought to look at those who cause the majority of such issue, in this case terrorism, murder, etc., and clearly the facts and numbers show its not white radicals. Nonetheless, yes I do condemn their actions as I condmen those of the left, islam, etc. Even if slavs killed innocent people in a terrorist attack i'd condemn it. Yet you're incapable of even condemning violence by the aforementioned groups.
And FYI - no 'spectacular' doesn't mean 'extreme' thesaurus.com/browse/spectacular?s=t Right under it it says 'adjective - wonderful, impressive'
Amazing, astonishing, grand, magnificent, splendid are all also synonyms. Therefore based on your comment that the backlash will be spectacular one can only assume that you're describing the backlash as wonderful, impressive, grand, magnificent, amazing, etc.... Don't see extreme anywhere... Hence, one can only assume the backlash, in your opinion, will be amazing, astonishing, splendid, magnificent, etc. You could've used a word like horrible or even deadly to describe the backlash but you refuse to condemn violence caused by the left.
There's a such thing as constructive criticism. Perhaps you could try it against antifa so they stop assaulting innocent people everytime a conservative speaker is invited to a campus or some republican holds a rally. Or you could constructively criticize muslims for killing scores of people and say that they ought to give peace a chance.
This is my last statement on the events in VA. Its been fun debating but I want to move onto another topic.
@Lyzko
They're definitely not the main stream. Republicans don't like them because they constantly give us a bad name.They represent a tiny fraction of the conservative/republican voting base. It's just that the biased media uses them for the sole reason of trying to brainwash people into thinking that all conservatives/republicans are like this and are full of racism and hate.
Funny because they interview the vice mayor who openly discusses on his twitter feed how much he hates whites, how white women look like bean stalks, and even disses his fellow blacks for speaking like intelligent white people. I can't believe he was vice mayor for this long. Good thing he's gone now. If you want an example of hate speech, just look at the things this guy said. There's a link a few posts back that greggy posted.