Let's discuss muslims, jews, buddhist, and christians

All I can say is that some PF-ers, with LL in the forefront, are so debased and mean-sprited that they are best ignored, not replied to.

What does "LL" stand for?

Anybody's guess:-)

The PF's official Liar Laureate.

And our Heavenly Father awaits for all of us come Judgment Day.


Out of context !
Those words could not be anymore straight forward then they are unless you are in some kind of denial.


Let me know how that works out for you come Judgment Day ?


Ah yes, shake the dust off your feet......Mathew 10:14.

Well, you certainly can't argue with the facts, can you? The simple fact is that until the second half of 2013 it was completely legal in the Vatican City for men of any age to have sex with 12-year old children. Not just to do what jimmy did and think about the "racing hormones" and "sexual desires" of pubescent girls but actually to have sex with them. It's utterly disgusting that the Roman Catholic church did that, so of course you want everybody to ignore it.

What did Jimmy do ?
Sources please
We do know that you have sodomized girls even though you change your story back and forth from girls to women.
If you are going to be a good liar Moana you have to have a good memory.

Judgement Day remains an exclusively Christian concept, Jimmy! We Jews have no such idea of sniffing brimstone through a nail or some such stuff:-)

What about the other billion or so Chinese Buddhists or our Muslim brethren?? They as well as we won't be "saved" because we/they don't believe in Judgement Day??!

Something's wrong with this picture.

Jimmy Savile pretended to be such a good Catholic that he was made a Knight Commander of St Gregory the Great by Pope John Paul II. But at the same time Jimmy Savile actually did to pubescent girls the vile things that you only think about doing.

Here's a source about that Jimmy: bbc.com/news/uk-20108980

Plenty of things. Brought up a Roman Catholic and turned out to be one of the worst sexual offenders in history.

And yet only YOU could suggest how peadophile RCC priests should be honored as martyrs for buggering little boys.


Now that's rich, very rich about what you think.

How could they not know about what he was doing, I wonder?

The BBC kept covering for him?

Not really. He was very good at covering for himself.

This is absolutely true.


You are notorious on here for attacking the RC over its responsibility for child abuse. So it's not surprising that you can't bring yourself to hold the BBC to account for its responsibility for the same type of abuse which occurred by someone on their payroll and on their property.

Savile's pedophilia was an open secret within the corridors of the Beeb and they were complicit in silencing those who dared to question it.

John Lydon says he was 'banned from BBC' over Jimmy Savile comments

"The former Sex Pistol says he 'did his bit' to alert the public to Savile but that his comments made in 1978 were never aired"

Source: theguardian.com/music/2015/sep/24/john-lydon-says-he-was-banned-from-bbc-over-jimmy-savile-comments

More paranoia from websites, Bieggers? It doesn't alter the truth about the RC church's consistent complicity in child abuse on a scale that only suggests tolerance and tacit approval ...

@jon357

Oh? So for you child abuse only matters when it comes to the scale of it.

Right, that explains then why you give the BBC and the Asian sex gang in Rotherham a free pass. Their child abuse didn't reach your personal "threshold" for concern.

It's clear that you are no advocate for the safety and welfare of children. Since you are an admitted homosexual your lack of concern is obvious.

And you are bitter too about Christianity (and in particular the RC) because you and your kind weren't accepted because you were never needed. Therefore, child abuse among Christian clergy makes a convenient target for you to engage in some score settling.

You would certainly change your tune about child abuse within other groups though if Islamists began chucking queers off the top of buildings around Europe and the media were too cuckold to report on it.

he's more or less on the record as not believing (or at least being very skeptical about) the charges against JS...

don't know what he says about Rotherham (most liberals fall all over themselves being unconcerned)

All the members posting here that rip the RCC are on record as not believing and have no religion themselves. (Heathens)
Makes it easy for them to point fingers when it is a one way street.
This is why I have relentlessly tried to get them (jon, Harry, Lyzko, delph.........) to explain Judaism to us because they all "Claim" to be Jews.

Funny part is they all know lots about the RCC and nothing about Judaism.

Apparently, you can't explain what it means to be Catholic (although you insist you are one). And you have the unmitigated temerity to cast aspursions on OUR Judaism??!

Boy, that's rich:-)

Anyhow, at least I'm not a hypocriteLOL

Perhaps he might have more luck trying to explain this story: pri.org/stories/2015-09-18/south-america-has-become-safe-haven-catholic-church-s-alleged-child-molesters


One has to wonder how many beasts are currently in Poland, having escaped justice elsewhere. I'm aware of at least one 'religious man' personally who has a highly questionable background.

Me too:

rabbi is arrested on voyeurism charge

"Barry Freundel, 62, of the Kesher Israel Congregation, was being held in police custody...Within hours, the synagogue's board of directors suspended him without pay...Law enforcement authorities said the case involves a hidden camera but gave conflicting accounts of where the alleged voyeurism took place. Both the synagogue bathroom and the mikvah, where ritual bathing takes place, were mentioned."

Source: washingtonpost.com/local/crime/police-arrest-georgetown-rabbi-on-voyeurism-charge/2014/10/14/15a73206-53cc-11e4-809b-8cc0a295c773_story.html
Oy vey!

I see that infamous trio is back to their old tricks. Casting aspersions on the RCC and its clergy. Ignoring facts and reality as per usual.

Need I remind you that an overwhelming majority of child abuses are carried out by homosexuals. That rotten apples are just a negligible margin of the mass of people doing a lot of good. Much more in fact that each and all individuals of the trio that like to smear and cast aspersions on their betters.

As one can expect those people are biased and their motivations cannot be trusted. Observe if someone uses generalisation while talking about Muslim, they're on them in a flash like flies on a fresh turd. Scolding and reprimanding, calling names and offering their enlighten advise. Somehow all their special attributes, specifically their enlighten superiority and impartiality fail them if they talk about CC.

So you produce one questionable individual to counter systematic evasion of justice by priests.

Try harder, Biggers.

Ok, here's another:

To Catch a Predator (Men Going After Children On The Internet) - Rabbi David Kaye Gets Busted

youtu.be/4qdVORgvP-M

Here's some more:

wall-of-shame - Jewish Community Watch

Source: jewishcommunitywatch.org/wall-of-shame

Be sure to keep hitting the button "Load More Results". It goes on and on and on.

And yeah, these are only the ones who got caught.

Tip of the iceberg old boy, tip of the iceberg.

And you can't produce a source where I ever" insisted" on any such thing which makes your statement about me a lie.
You should know better then to listen to your Jewish Brothers here.
They are both liars too.

I think it depends on what you mean by paedophilia. They were probably aware that he pursued girls in their early teens but I doubt that they were aware of the extent of his extra-curricular activities, shall we call them? He got up to plenty of weird stuff outside the BBC apparently. He wasn't the only one at the Beeb either to take advantage of access to young teens. It seems to have been seen as a perk of the job. I don't know to what extent people are aware nowadays but there was a time, especially in the 1970s when it was quite acceptable in show biz circles for grown men to have sexual relations with girls as young as thirteen. It was quite common. Sometimes the girls were willing partners though many of them probably regretted it when they reflected on it in later years and felt they'd been taken advantage of. It's funny how nobody has come after Robert Plant or Mick Jagger. Led Zeppelin were absolutely notorious for having young girls in tow, very young, thirteen, fourteen years old. Didn't Mick have some Breton peasant girl whom he or Donald Cammell had picked up in France who wasn't more than fifteen and was in that movie Performance. And of course there was Bill Wyman and Mandy Smith. He was around fifty and she was thirteen. Of course he married her later. She says she didn't really want to sleep with him but she doesn't feel that she was abused.


To be honest I'm not surprised nobody listened to Johnny Lydon. I mean come on, he was one of the Sex Pistols for God's sake. They'd hardly be considered reliable witnesses. They had a reputation for being outrageous simply for the sake of it so no doubt it would just be considered another piece of attention seeking behaviour.


Actually Lyzko that's pretty common amongst Catholics :)) In fact you could nearly take that as proof that he is one!


In fairness Johnny I don't think Jon ever claimed to be Jewish. He may have inferred it however, because he likes to wind people up, just as much as you do.

One of the dirty big secrets about men is that almost all adult men have greater or lesser tendencies toward ephebophilia (sexul attraction to those in the 15-18 year age range) and many have tendencies toward hebephilia (sexual attraction to those in the 12-15 year age range).

That doesn't mean they all obsess about (young) teens (and for most men it remains just a kind of general attraction that is not acted on) but adult male... proclivities definitely tend to skew in that direction. So it's no surprise that a high percentage of men with the means (money and/or other types of status) explore those feelings (so to say). Doesn't make them less than scumbags for doing so but it's not some weird out of the box paraphilia.

Yes, I would say it's very common and quite natural really, if you think about it. It's just nature that a male is attracted to a sexually mature female. The animal instinct probably sends a message that here is a young, healthy mate, ideal for procreation. There was a time in our not so distant past when life spans were short and there was a need to reproduce as early as possible; a thirteen or fourteen year old girl would have been married and pregnant within the year so although society now considers that taboo and our intellects reject it, our instinct sends us another message.

I would just change that to "freshly (or newly) sexually mature".

And yes, technology and social infrastructure change much more quickly than do base reptilian-brain features....