When Tusk lead the government, Poland's voice was heard in Europe.
Lol! considering it was a voice that echoed German voice. As I have said - Tusk - a German puddle.
attempted strategic realignment to the UK and later USA.
You're giving them too much credit. I would say that in the face of the German gov hostility PiS gov done the best they could. Although I firmly believe that Poland should leave the EU. The way the EU is heading doesn't bode well for the interest of Poland. As for the USA and the UK realignment - it has its merits. I wouldn't write it off.------
We have managed to reach a civilized conduct between European countries, in which we communicate with each other diplomatically.
Ok, you have misunderstood my allegory. I mean that Poland has it internal grapple with post- commies. They have been in fact in charge of Poland for the last 30 years or at least in control. Breaking slowly that dead grip mean that Poland will not be satisfies with the place soviets (those post-commies) found for it. The reason is simple - it is a bad deal.
Poland has it own interests and issues that PiS gov, not fully as yet and admittedly somewhat awkwardly voice now and then.
I understand other countries are seeing it as a breaking of some of consensus, done deal or whatnot.
They have two choices - deal flexibly with Poland and strike a new deal or go all hard in - all or nothing.
Seems to me that doing it a hard way proven to be a fail. Form the country where the general populace (not the war generation of course) liked Germany and Germans as a good friend it changed its perspective into something less favorable towards Germany, the same goes for the EU.
More hard balls this way and you will convince Poles to build a wall on the western border.
hat there is no legal justification for such demands.
There is a legal justification for those demands. The fact some German experts claim otherwise has no value. So far it is - our experts versus your experts. \
That means absolutely nothing either way. You should know that.
Poland has received more than enough compensation already.
That is an arrogant lie. Poland received very little indeed.
"Raising an issue that had been settled."
It hadn't been settled properly. However I concede that you made a point here. That is the only valid point you made on the issue of compensation - so kudos to you. As to the moral issue - Poland's claim is morally justified 100% there is not doubt about it.
"Completely ridiculous"
Well, maybe you are unaware of those facts. I Don't expect that you will take my world for it. So let agree to disagree.
"Poland received negative press coverage from all of Europe "
Poland received negative coverage from the one quarters - from the 'liberal' / progressive elites as they are those who dominate in those countries.
All this BS about the rule of law, endangered democracy, rise of the fascism, nationalism and so it just a pure nonsense and invention.
Polish gov is being punished for not following of the dominant progressive line in the EU. IF Poland would have taken quota of illegal Africans, introduced gay marriages, paid lip service to all the crap progressives love - its gov would have be free to do what they want without anyone raising a concern. I'm sure that tanks against people on the streets would be overlooked or excused by the western progressive cronies.