Bobko
20 Aug 2022 #1321
70,000 killed or wounded.
Apologies, I thought I recalled you citing a 70,000 number somewhere and I must have got confused... Actually, I found it! On June 26 (JUNE 26TH, hahaha), in reply to Velund you said the following:
Whats more special is more than 35000 dead Orcs and close to 70000 wounded Orcs.
So now you say it's 70,000 total killed and wounded. Ok. I guess Russian soldiers get reborn like Lazarus, and that explains the reduction in your numbers over the last two months.
Let's do some logical exercises now. The first stop will be establishing what the Ukrainians themselves are saying, and they are saying that they are vastly outnumbered. I'll post some images at the bottom of this post of what I get when I Google "Ukraine outnumbered".
Now:
1) Russia supposedly had 200K in its initial invasion force.
2) Ukraine claims it has an army of 700K, and promised to raise it to a million by end of summer.
3) PolAmCow says Russia has lost either 70,000 or 105,000 total, depending on which PolAmCow you are talking to - the June one or the August one (perhaps this is more determined by his blood alcohol content).
... and now here is the question - how do you, pray tell, make sense of these numbers? Are Russians continuing to "outnumber" the Ukrainians while having only around half of their initial invasion force? Perhaps Ukraine actually has much less troops than she continues to report? Maybe... Russian losses actually been modest, and the recruitment drives successful, while Ukraine has lost a disproportionate amount of men and materiel? But how could this be - our main military expert claims that Russian losses are 2X of Ukraine'a.
Actually, I apologize - it's impossible to have any kind of logical exercise if the starting point is your retarded claims. Help me out, what am I missing here?

0F0CFFAE1BD745D2B.jpeg
DC1C49523AEE42B8B.jpeg

848BB07434AA46758.jpeg