You've asked:
Why would anyone offer their second, third, fifth home which they either worked hard for or someone who left it to them worked hard for?And my answer is because they are those who gained the most from the fall of communism, the rest of Poles if not lost then gained nothing.
And why should they be indebted to Muslims, you may ask. Here goes the article from
Le Nouvel Observateur, of January 15-21, 1998, which sets the context. The article was considered irrelevant by a moderator and put to bin. Here it goes: globalresearch.ca/articles/BRZ110A.html
Brzeziński is saying in this interview among the other that
the secret operation [against the Soviet Union planded and put into practice by Brzeziński]
was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter. We now have the opportunity of giving to the USSR its Vietnam war. Indeed, for almost 10 years, Moscow had to carry on a war unsupportable by the government, a conflict that brought about the demoralization and finally the breakup of the Soviet empire.You can gather from here that the fall of communism is due the courage and bravery of Mujahideen Muslim fighters and also, if you read the rest of the article, that there are many and different Muslim countries like there are many and different Christians: moderate, secular - not only fundamentalist ones.
Beside all that, you should know that people fleeing from war are the same all over the world.
Why rich people should bear the cost of help, you may ask then. Well, firstly, they are the ones who gained the most from Muslim epic fighting against communism; secondly, they have the means to help, they also are the most educated and conscious people and should therefore show the way for the rest of the population, which may consider itself poor, but by the standards of people fleeing a war, they are not so poor.