USA News and Poland - part 18

When I saw this picture, I was waiting for some leftard on here to claim it was proof he was carrying ID:




True! That or maybe he just sat in the live studio audience for that boring, unfunny British TV sitcom Dad's Army - probably wandered in off the street for some temporary free shelter and a brief escape to forget his miserable little life.

He may have been outraged by the closings of the illegal Somali Learing Centers.


I do wonder what made him leave the UK for Poland. People don't usually pack up and disappear without a reason.

It's interesting how often he jumps straight to calling others pedos. That kind of obsession usually says more about the accuser than the people he's accusing.

• 
  622216308_7863814411.jpg
  

@Poloniusz

Remember when the leftards went insane over Kyle Rittenhouse bringing a gun to a protest, but now they're pretending this situation is totally different. The hypocrisy is unreal.

• 
  623466028_2315881982.jpg
  

It is different.

Rittenhouse brought a gun to fill a gap where there wasn't adequate law enforcement while anarchists were burning down a town.

Not exactly sure what the full story is, but it looks like Pretti may have been an anarchist who brought a gun to obstruct law enforcement from doing their legal duty.

Both outcomes were tragic.

Both punishable by instant execution without trial ?

Rittenhouse shot and killed two people. Pretti didn't even draw his gun. But you want to claim that the situations are not different. I see why you've never been able to get a more intellectually demanding job than washing windows.


He had ID. It was used it to identify him, after the masked goons had murdered him. And he was in no way interfering with law enforcement: He was filming the crimes of masked goons and then trying to aid one of their victims.


The good news is that the ICE sign-up bonuses have to be repaid if the recipient leave government service within five years. Of course most of the masked goons have already spent their bonuses and have no way to repay. So just transfer them all to ATF and send them to red states to arrest people carrying guns while drunk, carrying concealed guns, carrying guns they don't have licences for, carrying guns despite having felon convictions, etc, etc.

Yes, and he was found not guilty on grounds of self-defense.

The three people Rittenhouse shot were actively engaging him, not just standing by:

- Joseph Rosenbaum ran at him and grabbed the barrel of his rifle.

- Anthony Huber struck him with a skateboard and tried to wrestle the rifle away.

- Gaige Grosskreutz advanced with a handgun pointed at Rittenhouse.

They were rabid leftist participants in the confrontation, not passive bystanders.

Just like we're seeing today in Minnesota, and the wailing and gnashing of dentures on PF from the usual crowd.

Somebody ran at Alex Pretti and grabbed his gun. Does that mean Alex Pretti would have been justified in shooting that person? Of course Alex Pretti actually made no attempt to shoot that masked goon, instead he was shot by that masked goon's co-defendants.


Somebody struck Alex Pretti repeatedly with a can of chemical agent after first spraying Alex Pretti in the face with chemical agent while Alex Pretti had his hands in the air. Does that mean Alex Pretti would have been justified in shooting that person? Of course Alex Pretti actually made no attempt to shoot that masked goon, instead he was shot by that masked goon's co-defendants.


Somebody advanced with a handgun pointed at Alex Pretti. Does that mean Alex Pretti would have been justified in shooting that person? Of course Alex Pretti actually made no attempt to shoot that masked goon, instead he was shot by that masked goon.

It's crystal clear why you and Joke think it was perfectly acceptable to murder Alex Pretti. Here's the reason in a picture:

• 
  Jokesheroes.avif
  

Its a rather simple problem to solve. Dont want to get shot, dont put yourself in a position to have it happen. If the State of Minnesota had followed and upheld the law the illegals wouldnt be in the US, and none of this would be happening there. Maybe before people whine about the people who are upholding the law, they should uphold the law themselves. These are the same POS who turned neighbors in for not wearing a mask, and for having people over during covid.

Better still, don't shoot people.

It's very very clear from their comments here that those on the extreme right do not view the people they shoot as people. Just look at the statement above from our Ukrainian friend about the extreme right using people as targets.

Trump lied and it will hurt him in the midterm elections...we hope and pray!

Pretti strolls off the sidewalk - jaywalking like it's the red carpet - toward ICE. Packing heat, a round already chambered, as if he's starring in his own action movie. There's no legal reason, no logic - just sheer recklessness.

The forum is still waiting for you to explain what, exactly, you're defending when it comes to Pretti's wanton and dangerous actions.


Amateur footage doth catch it all: he is smote with pepper by the officers of ICE, whilst he doth meddle in the affairs of law.

How swiftly doth he escalate, mark it well!

From petty misdemeanour - mere jaywalking - he doth vault, with headlong haste, into a race of transgressions, courting every felony he knew not, nor heeded, ere his tragic end.

Packing heat, that instrument of supposed dominion, hath now become the agent of his undoing; hoist upon the very engine he meant for defence, he meets the justice of his own reckoning - failing to quell the "somebodies" who surged with greater force than he ever foresaw!


The rabid left have always hated it when their victims shoot back.

Well why didn't you lead with that first time? If he was jaywalking, he most certainly deserved the summary execution that was meted out to him, right?


That's how it would be described in Poland. But in your country it's referred to as exercising one's second amendment rights. A right which is available to everybody. Well, everybody who isn't a convicted felon. Oh, sorry, I forgot about those felony charges somebody faced after stealing mommy's credit card to telephone a PF member in Poland and make death threats. Well, everybody who isn't mentally incompetent. Oh, sorry, I forgot about the mental incompetence defence that somebody used when charged with theft, fraud and making death threats.


Has somebody's mommy forgotten about his pills this morning?

@PolAmKrakow
You are remarkably strident about the need for citizens to obey the law.

Surely everyone makes an occasional mistake and is entitled to a fair trial ?

The forum is still waiting for you to explain what, exactly, you're defending when it comes to Pretti's wanton and dangerous actions.


The Second Amendment does not let you commit a crime - that's been explained already.

It'll be waiting for eternity. It's impossible to defend wanton and dangerous actions when somebody took neither.
But it is interesting that you consider somebody exercising his second amendment rights to be dangerous. Have you considered that not everybody is mentally incompetent and thus some people are not automatically dangerous when exercising their rights?


He committed no crimes, as has already been explained to you. He was the victim of many crimes and I look forward to the trials of the criminals who murdered him.

That's quite the about-face, Mr. Live Studio Audience Member of Dad's Army.

Less than two years ago, you were happily contradicting yourself - apparently time and self-awareness haven't improved since:


https://polishforums.com/law/poland-gun-control-people-allowed-own-88598/21/#msg1969729

Your words betray your insecurities, don't they?

But let's put aside your immature, Trump-like body-part insults and your outdated idea that aggression proves courage.

So why did Alex Pretti bring a loaded gun to confront ICE instead of just using words, as you so wisely advised others not long ago?

Some good news for our friends in the USA!

reuters.com/world/bovino-removed-his-role-us-border-patrol-commander-large-atlantic-reports-2026-01-27

I'm very much looking forward to his trials for perjury and other crimes. But we shouldn't talk about those yet, just on the exceedingly remote chance that Taco Don does pardon him. Let's hope he has plenty of time in the next couple of years for cosplaying as a Nazi without any power before he and the goons he commanded answer for their crimes.


Boy, it's not me who has a criminal record that includes making death threats via international phone calls charged to his mommy's credit card.


He, unlike you, had a right to carry firearms. And he did not go to confront ICE: he was walking home when masked goons confronted him, assaulted him, hit him in the head repeatedly with a steel can and then shot him in the back nine times.

So, why has your name appeared in INTERPOL notices?


Glad to see that you correctly used the past tense.


Sure, sure. And the rampaging lesbian was just dropping off her kids at school.


Wow - and suddenly, out of nowhere, for literally zero reason, it happened! Somebody did something! Blah blah blah.

So again - why didn't Pretti follow your sage advice and just have a polite exchange of words...instead of bullets?

Yes, he had that right, up until the moment that the masked goons murdered him. I know it's tricky for you to understand rights when yours are so limited, for obvious reasons, but dead people don't have the right to bear arms.


That's exactly what her phone data shows she was doing driving to that school and then driving home.


Stop lying about exchanges of bullets: all the bullets went in one direction.


INTERPOL notices are public record, so you'd be able to link to them if you weren't lying. Here, link to the ones you claim are about me: interpol.int/en/How-we-work/Notices/Yellow-Notices/View-Yellow-Notices and/or interpol.int/en/How-we-work/Notices/Red-Notices/View-Red-Notices

Unlike INTERPOL notices, the criminal records of US minors are not public record, which I why I haven't posted the info about you. But perhaps I should send your comments about using humans for target practice to the same people who handled you making death threats? Apparently the lesson you seemed to have learned back then has now been forgotten and you need your internet access cutting off again.

...that your "hero" decided to break the law.


The videos, especially the one from the ICE agent who was nearly run over, show that she deliberately taunted and interfered before ultimately using her vehicle as a weapon. She chose escalation over responsibility and failed to think about her children, who should have come first. Taking a detour would have avoided the entire situation.


Nope. The audio clearly captures a single shot from Pretti's gun, a heartbeat pause, then multiple shots from the ICE agents. It was nothing like the debated, accidental "first shot" at Lexington and Concord during the Revolutionary War (which your side lost, by the way, thanks to Polish heroes Kościuszko and Pułaski). This was deliberate because Pretti had already chambered a round. It is unmistakable and undeniable.


Nope. In your panic to see which notice your name was on, you missed the part that INTERPOL notices are not public records unless the requesting country allows them to be published.

MAGA gets schooled about Trump tariffs:

• 
  maga-tariff.avif
  

You think @im_danregalado is MAGA?

Based on what?

Check his other page first, where he's boasting about his properties in Macao: threads.com/@im_danregalado/post/C__-Yw4yADG

And tariffs? MAGA is supposedly America First. So why import equipment from Spain instead of buying domestic?

I've said it before: Americans aren't (and never will be) an ethnicity.

So if he's American, it's certainly interesting that someone named Regalado - of Portuguese, Spanish, and Galician origin - is shopping from "the homeland."

Keeping the money in the family, apparently.

Fueled by a grudge? Was this the motive for returning to confront ICE, loaded for bear?

Alex Pretti broke rib in violent confrontation with ICE just days before he was shot dead in Minneapolis

Alex Pretti had been injured in a scuffle with federal agents in Minneapolis just one week before he was shot dead, it has emerged.

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15502789/alex-pretti-federal-agents-shot-dead-minneapolis.html

This didn't start with bullets. It started with someone inserting himself into a law-enforcement operation while armed, escalating a chaotic situation instead of backing away.

If you're carrying legally, you keep your permit on you. I do, and everyone I know does. Not having it raises questions about his intentions.

Official DHS Claim: Border Patrol Commander Greg Bovino stated that Pretti had a 9mm semi-automatic handgun and two loaded magazines but possessed no identification.

State Law Requirement: Under Minnesota law, individuals carrying a firearm are required to have their permit and a valid government-issued ID on their person.

You left out the next bit "failure to carry these shall result in immediate execution without trial"

You guys are all cult members. Don't you see the whole world can see what happened because someone filmed it

They took the gun away from the guy, and then shot him. The video sums it up perfectly...



He was carrying legally and never pulled out the gun. This is nothing short of murder.


That's right. They are like PiS voters in Poland - they will always find a way to justify the scoundrels they voted for.

That's the same goon who claims that the victims in this event were not the nurse shot nine times but the masked goons who did the shooting. And also the same goon who has admitted lying repeatedly while under oath. We can discount every word he says.


Correct. It was fired from his gun, in his direction, by a masked goon who wasn't trained enough to safely carry firearms.


Hahahaha! Even by your standards of mental illness, claiming that you have access to secret law enforcement documents is utterly deranged! I can tell you how I know all about your criminal past: it's because I know, both here and in real life, the member of PF that you telephone to make death threats to. In fact I was the one who convinced him to go to the police about the threats. He later shared with me the emails he'd received (and been forwarded) and told me about the conversations, by telephone and in person, he'd had with Warsaw police. My name and address are also both public and listed in Border Guard files, so I'd be very easy to find if the police did want to speak to me. I'm amazed that you'd even dream anybody would dream the Polish police are utterly incompetent; after all, they made very sure you were found and held to account for the crimes you committed against a victim in Poland. I wonder that they'd make about you fantasising about both using humans as targets and claiming to have access to secret law enforcement documents, shows a fairly dangerous escalation of your delusions and very much suggests that you need to have your internet privileges taken away yet again.

Yep. Some people can't accept though that citizens, especially adults, have responsibilities and not just rights.


Citizenship isn't a game. No one collects rights without responsibilities. In every functioning legal system, they come as a package deal, even when the duties aren't spelled out in toddler-friendly bullet points.


The "rights only" myth survives thanks to bad-faith actors, internet lawyers, and people who think laws are optional, or stop applying, if they simply ignore them or loudly insist they don't.

Courts have encountered this rhetoric repeatedly. They call it frivolous.

If someone's legal strategy when stopped for a law violation involves holding a roadside trial and cross-examining a police officer with amateur "law hack" arguments like "show me exactly where it says I can't," that's not "asserting rights." That's sovereign-citizen fan fiction.


Indeed. Yet again.

Your rant is called overcompensatory denial.

In interviews, truthful people tend to give brief, proportionate answers.


Deceptive or threatened people (like you obviously) respond with:

·Excessive detail

·Moral outrage

·Mockery ("hahahaha!")

·Grand narratives that go far beyond the question


It's also called "protest behavior" - trying to perform innocence rather than simply state it.

"I don't have a record." vs. "You're insane, delusional, dangerous, and here's a 300-word story proving I'm untouchable!"

Police are trained to notice this kind of imbalance.