Random Chat

@Joker, well, Novichok calls people he disagrees with "morons" and yet you seem to like him :)) So, I guess we're even.

I posted Z's literary achievements to help you find his "lighthearted humor". I couldn't find any. Nothing to do with his English.


I never call people I disagree with "morons". I call people who are morons "morons". From the top, those that claim...
1. A man can be pregnant.
2. Any woman is entitled to an abortion for any reason at any moment in her pregnancy.
3. Society may have an unlimited number of LGBTQs and still be viable.
4. Migrants are an asset.
5. Borders should be open.
6. All races are equally smart.
7. Only whites can be racists.
8. Wars are good for the economy.

That's just for starters...

Do you? You called me a "moron" and lately you apologised for that. So, am I a "moron", according to you, or not?

Novi,
wars are good for US economy. Migrants are an assets (about 70% my colleagues at work are migrants and we need more).

Does any of the items in my last post apply to you? If just one does, you are a brainless moron. I am just answering your direct question so don't run to the mods.


If they were an asset, countries would be bidding for them. They are surplus people nobody wants.

They are an "asset" to the short-sighted idiots who get the benefits of "cheap" labor that is not cheap to the tribe at all since that "cheap" worker has three kids and a wife the rest of the tribe has to support - their education and health services, if not incarceration. If you are still lost...that "cheap" worker does not earn ern enough and does not pay enough - if at all - in taxes to pay any of that. That pleasure belongs to the locals who were not consulted in the matter - through a referendum or poll. So much for "democracy".

Also, "cheap" migrants suppress wages to make drugs and booze attractive to the desperate locals.


The most idiotic claim of the year.

The stupidest argument ever. How the "what about" people feel is 100% irrelevant. 200,000 civilians died in Iraq vs 6000 in Ukraine. Those numbers are objectively true until refuted and not open to arguments and adjustments based on the feelings of the people who quote them.

Yes


You joined right in with your ha ha ha so you are as guilty.
Did ya get it that time ? (doubtful)


Awe come on, lets kiss and make up, please......... :-)

YUCK,THU! THU! THU! >>>>>>>>PUKE.
You might get rotten dentures in ya mouth.

So you are saying that you have been violently anal raped now too ?
Geezus maf, no wonder you are so touchy.


You are the one telling the story, not I so it is your creative imagination that is the cesspool.
Did you enjoy it ?
If you would just answer the question Yes or No we could get a better picture of how that could possibly have happened.

He lost his legs in an accident during his drug addiction,be easy on him he is a recovering addict,lets hope he dont relapse.


LQQKS like he did:)) or why would he respond like that.

Care to translate for us, Crow?

I was thinking the same as even a good liar would have a hard time beating his filthy fantasy.
Poor bastard needs help for sure.
He needs to come clean and answer the Yes or No question before he can move on.

YES he is a bastard for sure,no wonder has habit of poking his pinocchio nose everywhere until someone let go a wet fart on it.


Knowing his kind of retards they are afraid to answer the truth,but we know the truth only asking for his confirmation which dont matter anyway:)

And the first prize for stupid goes to .... a woman! Quoting:

'Russian cosmonaut' swindles $30,000 from Japanese woman
The con artist claimed he was stationed at the International Space Station and had to pay his way back to Earth

The second prize belongs to the stupid broad who last Friday at 3 am stumbled drunk out of a bar and into a random car to get a ride home. The wake will be held today at 7.

Just #2 which her being a full blown feminists finds her guilty of being a moron according to you.
2. Any woman is entitled to an abortion for any reason at any moment in her pregnancy.


+1

Because you have him either way he answers.
He took your bait hook line and sinker. lol
A yes or a No confirms his lying projection pity part for a defenseless defense.
You got him but good Cargo, nice work.

What you needs for translation?

@Novichok #663
Du you mean, the most iconic claim of the year.
Ps: our migrants are top earner up to 100Euro/h.

Analogizing the US going into Afghanistan with Russia going into Ukraine is also pretty stupid. Those who attacked America were in Afghanistan, harbored and protected by the Afghanistan government as they trained for acts of terrorism and paramilitary operations. Regardless of one's feelings, it's a stupid argument.

Iraq is slightly different, although there was a legitimate legal reason to take military action as Saddam continually broke the cease fire agreement by not allowing inspectors access to possible chemical, biological, and nuclear producing sites. The types of weapons Saddam proved he was willing to use, as he used chemical weapons against the Kurds. Although not as stupid as the actual invasion of Iraq, analogizing the Russian invasion of Ukraine with the US invasion of Iraq is still a little stupid.

These analogies hold no legitimacy, whereas the argument for Russian imperialism as a means of protecting itself is an honest and legitimate argument-albeit one that ends up as an argument of grave injustice.

However you slice it, this is a bs war, for bs reasons, that has absolutely no end in sight with no one showing a willingness to negotiate a viable peace. It appears that Russia is content with leaving Ukraine a pile of rubble and death and the West is happy for it to continue as a proxy war.

Putin, and only Putin, is to blame for this war, but the dearth of talented leadership in the West has exacerbated this sh!t show.

Then they are not "migrants". They are immigrants and, on top of that, professionals. US senators don't make $100 per hour.
Thank you for your bs.

WHAT ! (the hell you say)
Yeah, only plumbers, attorneys and car mechanics make that kind of money.


Thank you for yours. lol

@Novichok
Is bs for blessing or bullsh..t?

Other than the Japs in 1941, nobody attacked "America". A bunch of terrorists that America trained on how to fly planes took down a couple of tall buildings. That's not an attack on America just as the Boston mfers did not attack America. They committed a simple case of murder because America was stupid enough to let them is and ignore FSB's warnings. Yeah, the evil FSB warned America about these morons. But, since they were Muslims, America could not possibly just deport them without ten years of hearings.

The shoe bomber flew from Paris. Can we attack France?

BS. If the reason to take him out was legitimate, Europe was plenty capable of taking him out. Instead, it was the US again with the UK as a sidekick. Why? Because the US MIC hasn't found a war it didn't like.

Spare me Civics 101 good-guys-bad-guys crap. Saddam was never a threat to the US. In fact, when he was killing Iranians, he was our buddy and dearest friend. We not only loved him but supplied him with the intelligence to make killing Iranians more efficient.

Sure it was, we had you flopping like a fish out of water on that one and did you ever have a meltdown over it.

I am glad however that I have taught you the difference between "figuratively" speaking and "literally" speaking.
Maybe you do listen and learn from me.


That was just a figure of speech. :-o lol
Where is your defense attorney today ?
I miss her snotty one liners.

$125 an hr by me plus sales tax 6.75% app


$300ph and above trial attorneys cost over 500$ an hr tax included.


Local car dealership charges 170$ p hr labor costs, plus sales tax.

Civics? Who in the hell is talking civics? Good-guys, bad-guys? Who in the hell is talking good-guys, bad-guys? You're going off the rails and making some kind of aberrant argument.

The facts are we (whether wisely or unwisely) didn't take him out in 91 and made a cease-fire agreement with Saddam after we decided (wisely or unwisely) to defend Kuwait after invaded it (and, yes, I understand we defended Kuwait because of oil). Saddam did not keep his end of the bargain, therefore there was a legal reason. For the record, I did not fully support the Iraq war, so I'm not defending that war. However, analogizing it with Russia-Uke is stupid.

Al-Qaeda attacked America. Even if you go the conspiracy route of American insiders having something to do with it, al-Qaeda still attacked America. Even if al-Qaeda operatives were allowed into America and the US gov dropped the ball in allowing them to stay-al-Qaeda still attacked America. And, al- Qaeda was headquartered, if you will, in Afghanistan. Analogizing it with Russia-Uke is stupid.

NATO and EU invested a lot of to create this disaster in Ukraine. So, its quite possible that this what we see in Ukraine represents future of leading and EU powers. That or global nuclear war. Think about it.

Do NATO and EU even have time to retreat and show respect on Russia`s `red lines` or they wasted that chance? Its hard to tell.


What now happening in Ukraine, NATO and EU already done to Serbia back in 1999. Just Serbia`s policy didn`t threaten NATO in any way, while Ukraine`s policy do threaten Russia.

First mistake by NATO and EU was to ruin International law on example of Serbia (1999) and Yugoslavia (1991-1995).

After that Putin came in power.

See, Turks and AH made same mistake. They attacked Serbs and wanted to ruin Serbs what would ultimately lead to destruction of balance within Slavic world and then lead to final fall of Slavs ie Sarmatians.

I don't know much about Serbia, but saying a civil war that exhibited possible ethnic atrocities (who really knows the veracity of that claim?) is the same as one sovereign nation unjustly invading another sovereign nation screams one helluva psychedelic mushroom trip.