Bootlickers should never try to define themselves
And yet, I think you've succeeded in describing yourself to a tee. As Jon says, in real life, you're a 'nice' person and have probably always gone along with the prevailing opinion, either for the sake of a quiet life, or because you know on which side your bread is buttered and it's wiser not rock the professional boat by going against the grain. Now, in the winter of your discontent, you may well regret not having put your hand down your trousers and found your balls years ago - but you didn't, and so here you are on the Polish Forums.
Anyway, as you answered my question, after a fashion, I shall now answer yours. Of course you changed the wording a few times but I got the general gist of it. Before I do however, I'll tell you why I was reluctant to do so in the first place. I grew up in the Republic of Ireland during the years of the Troubles in Northern Ireland so for me, I have vivid memories of those times and although my day to day life was little impacted by them compared to the people in the north, it was a time that affected all Irish people in different ways and was a part of our daily lives in a way you can't imagine. When I encounter somebody who is genuinely interested in the subject or has a genuine question to ask, I'll discuss it readily. You don't fit that criteria and I'm not going to waste my time or cheapen the memory of those whose lives were destroyed by the violence in Northern Ireland.
Barney answered your question about POW camps. You had a chance to learn something, if you really gave a toss, because Barney is actually from NI and grew up during the Troubles. If you showed a modicum of respect, you had a golden opportunity there, but then you don't actually give a toss. All you want is to try to win an internet argument with glib platitudes and dictionary definitions.
Now to answer your question - the men you referenced are, in my eyes:
1) Terrorists
2) Criminals
3) Worse than criminals.
Would you like to know why I think that??