American understanding of Britain.

Almost certainly nothing.


Not in the U.K., hence little chance of extradition.


Savile complainants. Most of the 2000+ people who initially claimed money either withdrew their claims or were denied payment since he was proven to be elsewhere. If someone is a victim of a crime, they deserve justice. If however someone falsely claims that a crime has occurred, they are themselves committing a crime, as we saw in the cases of Carl Beech (himself a Savile complainant who received money; would you call him a victim too?), Jemma Beale, Victoria Hoynes (in the news this week) and others.

I think the Americans would be capable of throwing him into the dungeon. I mean, if they were capable of electing Donald Trump president ...

He will never go to jail just like the fugitive Roman Polanski, who drugged and raped a 13 year old child then absconded to Europe, never to return.

See, when youre rich and famous especially with friends that are Democrats or Royalty, there are a different set of rules.

I guess, we could only hope for street justice at this point.

Perhaps, the Queen of England who very respected around the world should force him to testify. It would be the honorable thing to do. I like the queen and have faith in her:)

Did he not spend time in jail originally? I know that he daren't enter the U.K. since he'd be extradited to California.

With Prince Andrew, the request was that he give a deposition to civil lawyers in the U.K, somewhat different.


As it would be honourable to send Anne Sacoolas back to Britain (from which she fled) to be questioned over the death of Harry Dunn. That however hasn't happened yet. She is however on the Interpol Red List, which Prince Andrew isn't. Interestingly Harry Dunn's parents have called on Prince Andrew to cooperate.

Totally spot on, it's not what you know but who you know..........The Queen will make sure he testifies, you can be sure of that.

But he will never be locked up, not even in The Tower of London.... LOL!!

Let's hope she does. Providing it's in exchange for the fugitive Anne Sacoolas returning to face justice for killing an 18 year old.

Which is what the current request is about anyway. Their 'state department' getting sore about Interpol wanting the wife of one of their intelligence assets.

Seems like a reasonable deal.

Anne Sacoolas should be ashamed of herself for escaping like that.

Agreed, but the UK signed a $h1t deal with the USA on extradition.... wasn't that Blair?

Agreed. 100% its taking too long.


Since, we have extradition with the UK she should be automatically returned. I dont get it? Ill have to read up.

What the difference with Interpol then, with Pulanski? They will nab him if he goes to UK?

It's not straightforward. Plus she claimed diplomatic immunity to which she wasn't entitled.


Sadly yes, a deal that would be illegal under the constitution in Poland, since it's an unequal treaty. One that was signed with terrorism suspects in mind but has since been used/abused for other things. There's a lot of bad feeling about it within the government and the legal system, and of course lawyers involved, so nobody is extradited there automatically under that treaty any more, especially after Gary McKinnon narrowly avoided being extradited. Part of the reason the Assange extradition case is being dragged out for such a long time, despite the U.K. government wanting rid of him.


The U.K. police would grab him, since he's technically a fugitive and the crime in question is also illegal there. He'd be extradited to California, treaty or not. He won't even change planes in London now, just in case.

Yes, very much a child jon.


See the difference jon, the girl wasn't of age and it was no accident and it was intentional not like it was with the kid who was of age and it was an accident.

Big difference.

None at all, Jim, since in Mr Windsor's case, it's far from clear whether a crime occurred or not and there is unlikely ever to be hard proof. In fact the complainant (and her PR team and booking agent) have changed her story several times already. In Ms Sacoolas' case, it is clear that a crime occurred since she was driving on the wrong side of the road and there are witnesses to this.

I think you are just confused jon, there was no crime at all in her case as she was just innocently confused with the backward way the English drive on the wrong side of the road.

Not be familiar with that she innocently had an accident.
Hell I have caught myself while driving in Jamaica committing the same mistake.
Andy however intention and knowingly committed a crime as it was no innocent mistake or accident.
Do you get it now jon ?

Causing death by dangerous driving is a crime. She knew which side people drive on.

Stop trolling; your attention-seeking behaviour no longer works.

Oh, so you are now claiming she intentionally drove on the wrong side of the road to kill someone ?
Stop trolling jon, your bias propaganda no longer works here.

She knew which side of the road to drive on. She admitted this herself..

And you're still trolling.

No jon, YOU are still trolling as everyone here was discussing the F.B.I. being on Prince Andrews tail to have him testify.
Obviously that was unsettling to you to think Prince Andy got caught with his pants down with an under aged child so you tried to do one of your trolling tactic deflections and focused on a completely unrelated topic that you are so infamous for doing.

The thread is Americans understanding Britain, not Britain understanding America.
Now apologize and promise to quit your clever trolling tactics as it is game over for you.

No, Jim. It's you who tried to relativise Anne Sacoolas' crimes, by falsely claiming she was in the right. She'll be brought to justice sooner or later.


Really? I'm no fan of the man. When we met socially I found him to be cold, uninteresting and of low intellect. He did not however get "caught with his pants down". If he had, there would be an extradition request. And there isn't.

And you're still trolling. Baiting too.

More of your rubbish jon.......please quote me saying any such thing.
You must stop such trolling jon as I don't take your bait anymore.

Oh man a whole thread devoted to the united kaliphate? Niiiice.. how did i not notice this before

And i think its safe to say prince andrews is guilty. At the very least theres strong circumstancial evidence and testimony. That jew epstein really liked his underage goyim shiksas...

Looks like London had one hell of a day today.
msn.com/en-us/news/world/this-powerful-image-of-a-black-man-carrying-a-white-counter-protester-to-safety-frames-a-day-of-chaos-and-race-inspired-violence-in-london/ar-BB15sBj2?li=BBnbfcL

Yeah, but London is getting to understand how things work....whilst Americans are loading bullets....

That's because London has none to load.

Check out 60 seconds of Londionstan.

youtu.be/YCOozfbV02Q

Give it another 20 years and there wont even be a London anymore

Who care,s Poland is a wonderful place to live in peace, where we ALL have the same mindset.

Indeed. I love Poland, that's why I came to this forum. Not to talk with these dirty brits!

No big deal, I understand why you don't like the migrant loser brits on this forum , but I have to say I am a Brit /Polskie

**** they (expats) work for 30zl an hour nowadays.

They have to be some major idiot expats to leave the UK to go and work for peanuts in Poland. lol

I wonder how many cars they have to wash at Chopin lotnisko to make ends meet?

The UK must totally suck if they have to abscond to another country and work for 1/2 the pay...hahahahaha

I don't get it either , ok for brit to retire here but its damn hard to earn decent corn or run a business here.

Just crop failures that couldnt become successful in the UK, so they moved away out of embarrassment...

As Dirk would say: LOSERS BACK HOME