"scripture" is not to be taken literally.
Perhaps you should go read Deuteronomy Chapter 5 called the Ten Commandments and then come back here and tell us that scripture is not to be taken literally as the egg drips from your face once again Dirtball.
(By the way.......Adrian wants your new address so he can come visit you.)
It is YOU, Johnny, who preaches with false authority
No it was you that said that animals go to heaven Pal.
you have little to any idea on this subject
No, it's you who is clueless.
I have done nothing but bury you time and time again on the subject.
To start with:
Your Liberal 'verbiage' is inaccurate.
I am anything BUT a "under" Christian.
(This truly illustrates the adage, A little knowledge is Dangerous. And you 'do rise' to that occasion.)
I am a 'practicing' Christian with a very STRONG and VIABLE Faith in OUR LORD and the Teaching of the Scriptures.
Where as your "Faith" is strictly based in "Progressive - ism" and what the Marxist Liberal Principles espouse!
(A truly FAILED Political Concept that has failed EVERYWHERE it's ever been tried !
But, it remains the rallying point for you Quasi Communists.
Pathos, indeed.
I'm a true believer...in TRUTH, not fiction
So , you're a "True Believer" !
'Which means your "Faith" is based on 'Scientific data'.Which indeed, flushes you out of the bushes as, basically an 'atheist' whose Mother wasted her time in 'Forcing' you to attend Vacation Bible School, and later, Church Services, to learn the GOSPELS.
It obviously DIDN'T TAKE. ('Sympathies' for the poor woman! She must be PROUD ! )
Your TRUTH is 'marginal' at best.
{I am using certain grammatical 'emphasis' in order to get your Attention to certain points.... noticing your lack of "LATIN education" in your "Hypochristian" reference.
Please Keep to basic English, you'll be more 'relevant'.... if that is even possible.}
That being said....
Being a "True believer...in TRUTH, not fiction"... ALSO denotes your submersion into LIBERALISM; i.e. You belief in HILLARY & BILL CLINTON, NANCY PELOSI , AND...that you can "keep your DOCTOR....AND your insurance Policy" !
(You no DOUBT ...sleep on Barack Obama Sheets at night...in your little RACE CAR bed ! )
Nice.... This Fragile and Ideological 'belief-system' must give you a REAL Sense Of COMFORT when you're facing "hard-times".... ( or do you just 'think' of Barak & Michelle .... and, suddenly, everything is "ROSY" ! ) yup. ( ...speaking of your "frailties"...)
The "Due Consideration" you refer to.... isn't based on any FAITH or Ecumenical Wisdom, it's based on the CONSIDERATION.... that YOUR Leftist Marxist Progressive "Cavalry' will come "Riding-Up" on their "WAR-Hogs" ....AND SAVE YOUR CONSIDERABLE "BACON!" ( how fitting! )
Fascinating that you should even consider "Christian Mercy" .... I 'm Very Sure: .... THAT chapter does NOT Exist in Your 'Personal-Bible"...."RULES FOR RADICALS" ( ...Your poor Christian Mother....she tried !) "YOUR SAVIOR"....Saul Alynsky....as the Marxist Communist that he WAS ( ask Hillary about that,
Her College Thesis was on that 'Ideological Genius' ) is the foundation of your 'Religion' which ALSO espouses CLIMATE CHANGE TOTAL AND COMPLETE TRANSFORMATION OF OUR COUNTRY INTO "SHARIA Law" and TOTALLY OPEN BORDERS !
And most importantly.... " Free Hot cocoa, cookies, 'Petting' Poodles, Safe Spaces, and TUMMY RUBS WHEN YOU'RE 'Verklempt" ! ahhhhhh
(THIS is your "Due Consideration" ...."Is he a GOOD and TRUE "BELIEVER" in Saul ????) Then... "Again, I DON'T deem personal
weakness (s) some punishable, moral failure of a lesser being!" is almost Unintelligible.
If, it's what I THINK you mean: You aren't "personally" RESPONSIBLE for your "weaknesses"...OR...your "moral Failures' !
SWEET ! ( You've got "MOMMY" on speed-dial).... and she "talks you-down" ...whenever your LACK of Morals and PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITIES land you in the ********* ! bet that EATS UP your Cell minutes & Keeps Mommy from her Jewish BINGO days!)
So "Needful " !
SO your 'back up' is a "Transcendentalist" ....Ralph Waldo ... Who was Based on A "literary" Movement from the early 19th century?
whose existence is to "PROTEST against the General State Of " Intellectualism & Spirituality " of that era ? ( REALLY ! ?)
His quote, that you've reproduced, is a direct reference to YOUR attempt at Intellectualism. How drole: you're quoting an author who's FOCUS in Life was to distain your very ATTEMPT at " being" ! ( again: the DANGERS of a" Little Knowledge"...)
Well Done "Bonzo, It's your- BEDTIME" ! Ga'Night ! (get yer 'blanky'...)
DON'T FORET ta Say good nite to Mommy !