How fascist are you?

Before we can discuss my convictions, we have to make sure that you have a sufficiently high IQ, fluency in English, and the minimum ability to think logically.

You have failed all three. So, let me start with this, sweetie.

If an ignorant guy objects to "you are born and you die implies simplicity" that means "you are born and die" does not imply simplicity. A guy with an IQ of 65 and up would offer an alternative to "simplicity" or rephrase the statement. But a troll who simply argues to have the last word will not do that because he is too stupid. That's you.

Bottom line; you are an embarrassment to Poles and teachers. In an open debate with a jury, I could have you for a snack - you are so transparent in your ignorance.

@Novichok

A brilliant demolition job on an arrogant prat.

No, we didn`t discuss any conditions to discuss your convictions. Stop changing the rules during the game. :):)


No, of course not - you are furious coz you are losing. Simple.


What??? hahaha

As you are a little bit deaf I will say it louder.... AN ARROGANT PRAT!!

...who thinks he is impressive.
Pawian, sweetie, you are not. You "win" by converting a linear conversation into a circle of madness. That is your debating "technique".

It would take you years to match me. You know it and that is why you have those handy exit ramps like "obsessed" and "dementia" at the ready.

Oh, and "darling"...

Excuses, excuses..... Show me where I used them in this discussion about mystic life matters. :):)


Yes, I try to do my best to be such. And I see I am successful. hahaha

A person who does not understand Shakespeare nor Marlowe, speaks of fluency and IQ. As if the I either the Q could mean something by themselves, for I doubt there is some of grey upon the top of such a shade that minds for no means. Then I Q, too, what kind of high he asks for, and what kind of English he speaks of.

You speak in lovely riddles. You mean Novi lacks the grey matter in his head?? Quite possible - some people suggest it might be dementia.


It is deplorable, indeed. That is why, we should keep where there is wit stirring, and leave the faction of fools like Novi..


I have no Saracen or Hebrew blood in me but my Christian heart is wide enough to embrace all people of any race or background.

How is your syphilis? Do you recall how you got it?

What? Are you so demented that you forgot the only sexually transmited terminal disease I have suffered from is LIFE???? So have you, darling. We are in the same boat. Or U-Boot. Or still better, the Titanic. buhahaha

Do sth with that dementia coz it is really unnerving. What did the specialist advise you about it? Don`t tell us you forgot coz you are so demented..... :):):)

I read that those in the more advanced stages of syphilis giggle a lot and for no good reason. It must be the itch that is hard to scratch under normal conditions.

Dementia! Of course there is a good reason - it is you, darling. :):):)

What mysticism in life?
It doesn't exist.
Only in your weak imagination.

...and when some bullsh*tter wants to make a quick buck.
Like I said, we are born, work our asses off, and then we die. No Hell, no Heaven, no afterlife, no Angels, no spirits, no nothing. No God, either. Only the crooks who can tell you what your dead grandma thinks about you for 700 bucks for a 20-minute "reading". Just a decomposing body.

I was in the wrong business.

I find it ironic when the leftists discover "mysticism in life" but hate Darwin.

Yes, I know, primitive people can`t see it and many other things, either. Not my problem. :):)


Prove it!!

Hey, genius, the burden of proof is always the affirmative side. Helllllo? Anybody home?

Of course not. Now you are making up your own rule which is useless in serious disputes. Whoever makes the claim has a burden of proof to justify or substantiate that claim - and it doesn`t matter it it is affirmative or negative.

So, darling, we are waiting for proofs of your claim. Ha!

No way are you going to turn tables on me. Mine was a conclusion resulting from the absence of proof in the affirmative.
The first opening sentence that ever spoken on this subject in my presence (and yours) was that God exists, is Almighty, and that Jesus was his son. That is what I was told when I was 9. All without proof. That's where we start and that is when I could have said, prove it! Just because I was a kid, and it's 70 years later does not change anything.

That principle, my dear little boy, is at the center of every decent legal system where the accused has no duty to prove his innocence. His only sure-fire defense would be that he was in prison at the time of the alleged event.

Yes, but it was you who claimed it first! HA!


Of course not. You were taught about Jehovah, not Jesus.


I do it several time a day. Easy. :):)

You were not sitting next to me so don't tell what I was taught. I was taught what I just stated. Yiour attempt to turn this into another circle of madness is now over.

But we know you love making up stories in the forum. I thought it was just another one of your hoaxes.

Here are the rules: the moment I sense that you decided to stop a good-faith conversation and start telling me what I think or know, we are done. You can jerk off by yourself.

Yes sa Masta Ricky Jerk Off


And 'rules' don't forget his rules. (snicker - snicker) ;-)