GefreiterKania
26 Aug 2024 #1051
Not until midway through the second republic
Nope. The identity was always there, throughout the partitions and right after regaining our independence, and it's a huge achievement taking into account that the Second Republic consisted in nearly 70% of Russian partition lands (19% Austrian and 11% Prussian), and 75% of all people lived in the countryside. The Polish-Soviet war, for example, is a lasting testimony to the strength of the idea of Polishness.
That's what foreigners - even those who spent decades in Poland - very often fail to understand. Poles survived as a nation because of this "straszna duchowa siła", as Rymkiewicz calls it, which caused ethnic Lithuanians, Russians, Belarussians, Germans, Tatars and even many Jews to identify as first and foremost Polish. The strength of this identification was such that they often sacrificed their very lives for Poland's independence. It survived the fall of the First Republic precisely because it didn't have its source in material advantage or belonging to a great and powerful state (otherwise Polishness would easily melt into the partitioning superpowers) but in the ideal of Polish republican freedom. People "infected" with Polishness, regardless of their ethnicity, simply never fitted into despotic Byzantine/Turanian Russia and Prussia. With Austria it was a bit different, but it's a topic for a different discussion.
Would Russianness survive the fall and partition of Russia for over a century, like Polishness survived the fall and partition of Poland for similar period? I am not so sure, and this is where another difference between Russians and Poles might lay.
anti-cultural leftist agenda
A deplorable and very real phenomenon. Luckily, Poles will never fall for it; it's incompatible with our soul.


