Poland, Hungary, The Czech Republic and consorts is most shoking and does shock.
No more than the US sending away St Louis with Jewish refugees on board escaping from Nazi Germany.
Nothing new. People are pretty selfish creatures, especially in times of some financial hardship, etc.
And, of course, by "consorts" you mean the UK, the US, Canada, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, etc. etc.?
Such countries have received and are still receiving so much help financially and otherwise and now, they don't want to help.
So what? The Western countries don't need to receive help, they're that rich, and yet somehow it doesn't look like they're willing to take in willingly millions of refugees. Only Germany stands out, as far as I can see.
And by saying they don't want to help you're simply lying - Poland agreed to take in refugees, ordinary Poles are already helping and Hungary apparently has more refugees than Italy o_O
Let's not forget that Poland has fought with the US in Irak and has ever since fought in all wars in the Middle-East so they are part of the team;).
Iraq - yes, but what kind of other wars in the Middle East are you're talking about? As far as I know Poland took part in the invasion of Iraq and as far as NATO operations are concerened - Polish forces are in Aphganistan and that's it o_O
I have a lot of Poles around me who are ashamed of their counntry and I agree with them.
That is so gracious and noble of you that you're ashamed of their country, but you haven't answered me yet - which country do
you come from that you're so self-righteous?
As to Poland "not being able to afford" this is pure BS since EU shall financially assist countries in supporting refugees.
For how long?
Have you read the article in The Financial Times? Or at least the quotes I provided? In Spain and other Southern countries the refugees are left with no help after six months. Poland also isn't a "benefits' country", so it's no rocket science how those refugees can end up. Even when Poland was evacuating Ukrainians with Polish roots from Donbas I was wondering what their fate is going to be, since I've seen a documentary about people of Polish origin repatriated from the territories of the Soviet Union - it was pretty depressing. It was some years ago, but Poland still isn't a land of milk and honey even for Poles and that's the reality and Poles realise what's the reality - and, apparently, even refugees do. We could say that we will take in everybody since they will go to Germany, Norway, etc. anyway, but what's the point? To look nice on BBC and CNN? lol
As I wrote, I will be happy if Poland will do it's share but at the same I, as other Poles, know very well where probably majority of those refugees will be heading once they arrive in Poland.
When Poles (and consorts) had to flee to other countries, they did not bother re host country's finances.
No refugees care about that and noone expects them to do that. It's the governments' job to care about that.
The world sees what countries are generous and what countries are selfish. Obviously Poland has forgotten about its socalled "Christian values". Others can die like mere vermin but the huge majority could not care less as long as EU's money keeps coming.
Yes, the world sees what countries are doing the nice talking for the time being, let's see what they will be doing later on. For now Germany said the Dublin Regulation is still in place, the last time I heard, so all the refugees/immigrants will have to be registered in Hungary (and as we could see for some reason they don't want to be registered there) and all the burden is still on the "transit" countries.
I am curious to see how many refugees Germany and others will take in reality.
What about so called "Christian values" of the US? Shouldn't The Land of the Free take the greatest burden since it's been making all those wars? I do wonder why do you cherry-pick the poorer countries which are emigrant and not immigrant countries?
I wouldn't expect from countries like Bulgaria or Romania to take any arbitrary quotas because I know very well that they're even poorer than Poland.
Even the UN (heard this am) demands the EU to act asap.
Maybe the UN should say the same thing to Saudi Arabia, Qatar, the US, Canada, etc.?
Let's not be naive, even if Poland (and others) are forced to take in a (very) few of these refugees, said refugees won't stay long in Poland since asap they'll move westwards.
Oh dear, you've just admitted that quotas are simply pointless. And what now? Do you have some sensible, constructive advice or can you only dance in the clouds on rainbows and wave a unicorn horn at bad, bad Poland and its' "consorts"? lol
You can come down on Poland and feel good about yourself all you want, but that won't solve the problem, which will be a growing problem.
How to keep refugees in Poland and other "consort" countries? Should we lock them up? What do you suggest, genius?
Btw, I must say I've noticed the same thing about many of the refugees arrving in Europe as was mentioned in the article in The Telegraph - they don't look poor or wretched or anything. Some of the boys I've seen were quite well dressed with fancy hairstyles - they're probably from Damascus? This is in stark contrast to those refugees in camps in Lebanon (or Libya?) - I mean, for example, this social add at CNN - "what changed for you in 4 years". Those people look downright poor and miserable and like in need of much help. I'm not saying that those that came to Europe don't need a safe place to live, but... Well, just compare the pictures... I'm starting to wonder whether those people who need the most help aren't missing out on it the most...