POLANDA : - powered by PolishForums   Classifieds [75] Off-Topic [334]
3246    

Off-Topicpage 31 of 109

Brexit 2019 and Poland



Miloslaw
5 May 2019  #901

I wouldn't be shocked right now if the Tories and Labour end up 3rd/4th in this election

And I think that is exactly what will happen.

Confirmatory vote it is then! And that's all that sane people want.

Sane people do not want that.
Sane people already voted.
Why vote twice?

Dougpol1
5 May 2019  #902

Interfered with vote?
What is there to fear if Brexiteers are so confident?

cms neuf
6 May 2019  #903

Why vote twice ? Because circumstances have changed and it is clear that leaving involves severe costs that were not made clear in the first referendum - simple to comprehend really

mafketis
6 May 2019  #904

Why vote twice ?

Because the voters did not do what the government wanted the first time.

Joker
6 May 2019  #905

Sane people already voted.

It sounds almost as bad as the American Snowflake Democrat that still wont except the results of our 2016 election. All they do is whine, cry, resist and don't get anything accomplished for the people that voted them into office.

Miloslaw
6 May 2019  #906

Because circumstances have changed

I Don't think they have.Only some peoples perception has changed.

Because the voters did not do what the government wanted the first time

Exactly, they need to implement the result of the first vote before even considering a second vote.

It sounds almost as bad as the American Snowflake Democrat

Our snowflakes are just as bad as yours!If not worse.

cms neuf
6 May 2019  #907

Ok so some people's perception of the circumstances has changed. Some people might perceive that access to the single market is only possible with freedom of movement and control by the European court. Some people might also perceive that the UK might break up as a result of Brexit. Even more people might perceive that instead of the 350m quid a benefit that it will cost the taxpayer many millions more per week.

All in all quite a lot of people with these perceptions.

delphiandomine
6 May 2019  #908

Exactly, they need to implement the result of the first vote before even considering a second vote.

The problem is that no-one wants to take responsibility for it. There's a few hardcore Leavers who will, but the majority of MP's don't want to be the ones taking responsibility if it all goes wrong. It's understandable really - if you're a Tory in an area where you've got Remainers breathing down your neck, do you want to sacrifice your political career for it?

Miloslaw
6 May 2019  #909

All in all quite a lot of people with these perceptions

You think so?
I don't.

if you're a Tory in an area where you've got Remainers breathing down your neck, do you want to sacrifice your political career for it?

There are less of them than Labour MP's in the reverse position.......

mafketis
7 May 2019  #910

Does Labor represent working people or capital? It was my impression that former progressive elements in the UK have all been coopted by the ideology that the purpose of government is to serve capital.

cms neuf
7 May 2019  #911

Yes I do - it is obvious that whoever is in charge the UK will get a worse deal than the one it has now. Certainly in economic terms. In political terms then any benefit must be weighed against the split of the UK.

The results of the 2017 election means hard Brexit won't happen. So the result of the first vote will never be implemented even if there was someone willing to stand behind the result and implement this fiasco.

Bratwurst Boy
7 May 2019  #912

Does Labor represent working people or capital?

Yeah well...socialism is dead since '89! I would be highly suspicious of any party still fighting the old war...the corpes of the victims are still warm.

mafketis
7 May 2019  #913

Yeah well...socialism is dead since '89!

You don't have to be full on socialist to be advocate for the working class... especially since the working class has been under sustained attacks by capital for the last 30 years (or more).

Anytime I bring up economic or cultural issues you always go straight for armageddon scenarios.... that is not.... healthy.

Bratwurst Boy
7 May 2019  #914

especially since the working class has been under sustained attacks by capital for the last 30 years (or more).

She was never worse off than under a socialist regime, believe me! Socialism/Communism is a 200 years - ongoing failure (and it wasn't for the lack of possibilities). How often do you want the people to put through a nightmare of blood and tears and opression again and again till you accept that?

Come to think off...that makes me wonder why you protested that new EU copyright law so seriously...you must know that for enjoying living in a workers and farmers paradise heavy censorship with cruel punishments is one basic requirement.

Bratwurst Boy
7 May 2019  #915

Anytime I bring up economic or cultural issues you always go straight for armageddon scenarios.... that is not.... healthy.

Yeah...well...it works with the Nazis! "Never forget" and all that...

mafketis
7 May 2019  #916

She was never worse off than under a socialist regime,

You're the one who's equating any concern for workers' rights with DDR style socialism, not me. I'm advocating for something like the New Deal that the US had during the period of its greatest material prosperity (and least social stratification).

Letting private businesses keep their profits private while socializing the costs is a terrible idea.

Neoliberalism is the worst of socialism and capitalism in one awful package - it puts the government in the service of private financial interests and treats the public like class enemies.

Trump, Brexit the yellow vests (and other movements) are all pushback against neoliberalism.

Why should an economic powerhouse like Germany have a working poor population at all?

Yeah...well...it works with the Nazis!

Yeah, as soon as someone uses the word 'racist' 'nazi' or 'fascist' I tune them out as having no defenses for their arguments....

dw.com/en/germany-poverty-threatens-almost-20-percent-of-population/a-46100497

Bratwurst Boy
7 May 2019  #917

You're the one who's equating any concern for workers' rights with DDR style socialism, not me

Of course, with what else should I equate it? With the Sovietunion? With Cuba? With Venezuela?

Yeah, as soon as someone uses the word 'racist' 'nazi' or 'fascist' I tune them out as having no defenses for their arguments....

Of course, what is there to discuss? To think loud together about how to repeat the experience next time?

Had the real horrors suffered once not been enough?

mafketis
7 May 2019  #918

Had the real horrors not been enough? For both?

you have severe problems and need psychological help... it's not normal for concern about workers' rights to immediately escalate to talk of nazis... it makes normal discussions of policy impossible, you're about as bad as dirk in a different direction...

Of course, with what else should I equate it?

social democracy? or is democracy a bad word since the DDR?

Bratwurst Boy
7 May 2019  #919

There is an option in the middle ground between hard core neoliberalism and socialism..it's called "social market economy" or "Ordo Liberalism", Germany fared very well with it during the last decades since the founding after WWII, also the scandinavian countries chose this way.

Maybe one should just avoid such burned nomers like "socialism" for good...people tend in a knee jerk reaction to run away when confronted with such slogans again.

Especially as this history is not that long past already and many people are still alive remembering their suffering...it's also a matter of respect to the millions of victims of that ideology!

it's not normal for concern about workers' rights to immediately escalate to talk of nazis...

Why? It didn't call itself for nothing "National SOCIALISM" !

you're about as bad as dirk in a different direction

What direction would that be?

delphiandomine
7 May 2019  #920

Letting private businesses keep their profits private while socializing the costs is a terrible idea.

Welcome to England in 2019. It's one of the most remarkable things about the English economy, to be honest.

Dougpol1
9 May 2019  #921

At last. Corbyn nails his colours to the mast for a public vote if no agreement can be reached in parliament (which it clearly can't). Even he, with his perpetual dithering, trying to be all things to all men, can't retract his words herein, which are clear - that Labour has now come down in favour of a public vote as the endgame.

labour.org.uk/press/jeremy-corbyn-launches-labours-eu-election-campaign/

Bratwurst Boy
9 May 2019  #922

The first question is what kind of society do we want to be?

Hmmm...a good and important question, maybe even overdue and the true reason for the referendum and the current quagmire. But I doubt the Brits who don't know that yet will find the answer within the EU.

The Remainers answered that question for themselves already, the Leavers did too.

But an ongoing membership in the EU would falsify the outcome for the undecided fence sitter.

For that answer to be found the Brits need to leave and to look for themselves if and how a life outside the EU fits them...otherwise there will be always hanging a big shadow of doubt over the country and the enemies of the EU will always pose the "What if" question (right back to the time before the referendum).

....only IMHO of course...

Miloslaw
9 May 2019  #923

For that answer to be found the Brits need to leave and to look for themselves if and how a life outside the EU fits

Absolutely correct.
If we are wrong about leaving The EU then we need the proof and leaving is the only way to know for sure.

jon357
9 May 2019  #924

a public vote if no agreement can be reached in parliament (which it clearly can't).

This is essential since the last 'referendum' was so flawed.

a life outside the EU

The relationship with the rest of our EU was never made clear. That part of the population who voted 'leave' did not know what they were voting for, and a significant part of that demographic are so economically and politically illiterate that they think a 'no-deal' leave would transport them back to the glory days of the past, not that such a thing ever existed. The very rich people people who paid for the ads and fund the 'leaver' campaigners of course make money out of instability and the misery of otthers.

Bratwurst Boy
9 May 2019  #925

The relationship with the rest of our EU was never made clear.

*nods*

There are alot of important questions which need to be cleared first...and that won't happen easily nor quickly!

Miloslaw
9 May 2019  #926

That part of the population who voted 'leave' did not know what they were voting for,

Oh dear oh dear oh dear......spouting that old leftie slogan Jon?
I thought you were more intelligent than that.......
Of course, in your opinion, the people that voted for Brexit were all uneducated,working class idiots....either too young to know anything or too old and wearing rose tinted glasses about the past (yes,you guys do like to have it both ways).

It is interesting that remainers paint a picture of stupidity on Brexit voters, but that the reverse is not true.
And the reason for that is not that Brexit voters do not think Remainers are gullible idiots who have fallen hook, line and sinker for The EU propaganda, but because Brexiteers will not lower themselves to your level.

We know you are gullible idiots.We don't need to go on and on about it ad nauseam.
The EU is a political machine that has run roughshod over the sovereignty of nation states and doesn't care....
The EU is about maintaining the lifestyles of some people in the political and support roles in The EU government.
The EU is about big business and the lobbying power they have.
In short, The EU is an undemocratic political institution designed for it's own purposes and with very little to benefit ordinary working people or smaller businessmen.

And before anyone says anyrhing about The EU being responsible for maintaining peace in Europe....they didn't,that was NATO,or more specifically, the nation you all hate so much, The USA.

What did The EU do in Yugoslavia?
And now they want an EU army?
What for?
Where will they be deployed?
Paris?
LOL!!
You lefties make me laugh.......

cms neuf
10 May 2019  #927

What did you expect them to do in Yugoslavia ? It was a 3 sided civil war 25 years ago at an extremely dangerous time in countires that were not even bordering the EU. The disarray in foreign policy was one of the reason why the Eu then tried to start talking with one voice.

It may be an uncomfortable fact but Brexit voters are on average older, less wealthy and less educated and yes many f them had no idea of the consequences of what they were voting for.

Miloslaw
10 May 2019  #928

The same can be said of many remain voters.This is just a meaningless political slogan and extremely arrogant and elitist too.

cms neuf
10 May 2019  #929

Might be elitist but its still true

Might be arrogant but its still true

Remain was a vote for the status quo - a known quantity with all its faults. It attracted sensible responsible people - who tend to make up what you call the elite

Leave was a vote for a leap in the dark which none of its leaders was willing to implement themselves.

Crow
10 May 2019  #930

Britain escaping EU considering EU becoming less attractive. Central European states strengthen and uniting interests. Britain insist to be rule on its own or ruled by US. But, Brits can`t deny their geographical reality.


PreviousNext
European News and Poland Thread [236]Macron insults The USA. [98]


Off-Topic / Brexit 2019 and Polandtop