Just a point : but if you actually knew Poland, you'd know that if you put two Poles in a room, they'd find ways to argue and divide themselves.
That is very, very true. I've discussed this before. There was one thread I started that stated 'what don't you like about Poland/Polish people' and the divisiveness and infighting is my biggest beef. I also stated Poles could certainly learn from the Jews how to be united and fight against common enemies instead of looking as other Poles as our competition.
Also, I do know Poland. I am born and raised in Poland, have family all over Poland as well as the rest of Europe (UK, Germany, Netherlands, Russia, etc.). I am fluent in Polish, celebrate Polish traditions, have Polish citizenship, travel to Poland regularly, and own land in Poland as well. I think I know my own country and my own people pretty well.
The "unity" that you talk about is very much a product of post-WW2 communism and not much else.
That's not true. For one, Poles were very unified before the post-WW2 communist era you speak of. One example I can cite is Armia Krajowa and the Polish underground state. It took a lot of unity to organize an underground state and lead the uprisings.
You are right though. Poles were very unified during Communism - it was one of the rare times that they were, (other modern era examples would be perhaps AK)- namely unified in fighting Communism through Solidarnosc and religious undertones.
It seems as whenever there is disaster or Poland as a whole is under threat, Poles are able to put aside their differences and unite. Oftentimes, religious figures are at the center of the leadership due to the importance of Roman Catholic tradition in Poland. Even people like myself that aren't 100% religious and don't believe all the dogmas still respect the Roman Catholic church and listen to their opinions and their voice as they have shaped Poland's history for over 1000 years.
as you can see from the 1931 census question on language.
Yes, as these were post WW1/pre WW2 borders, for example cities like Danzig had a German Lutheran majority. Also, your using a census over 80 years old. Since that time, all the cities in post ww2, modern day Poland are majority Polish Roman Catholic. The figures I cited, which are only 4 years old, argue that most Poles - 36 million out of the 38 million identify their ethnonationality as Polish.
You are right though - prior to WW2 was much more diverse. However, that has changed after WW2.
Your arguing that Poland is so diverse and has all these different cultures and people living there when that clearly isn't the case - only about 1.4 million people out of the 38 million don't identify as Polish as their primary ethnicity with 800k of those 1.4 million declaring non-Polish ethnonationality together with Polish one - Kashubs, Silesians, Germans, etc. So even if someone declares themselves a Silesian Pole - that'd still place them in that category. (According to the Polish census of 2011 I posted above). Also, according to Eurobaramoter 2012 - people living in Poland identify with the following religions - Roman Catholic 91%, Orthodox 1%, Other 2%, atheist/non-believer/agnostic 5%, not stated 1%. Sorry, but 9% of religions other than Roman Catholic don't exactly make Poland a melting pot of religions. As far as languages - Polish 97.8%, other and unspecified 2.2% (2002 census), nor does this make Poland a melting pot of languages. The main language outside of Polish is Kashub with about 100k speakers followed by German with 96k.
Just because there's 1000 Vietnamese living in Wroclaw doesn't make it a Vietnamese city, a significant minority, or even a diverse city. Just because Poland allowed a gay pride parade doesn't mean most Poles accept gays (as shown in the survey I posted in the lgbt thread.) You're using a tiny subset of Poland's overall population to argue that Poland is diverse, when the 90%+ of Roman Catholic Poles would argue otherwise. Actually, Saudi Arabia - thought to be a very, very homogeneous society with mostly hardcore Sunni Arabs living there, is actually more diverse than Poland since it has a much higher percentage of different ethnic groups (10 million foreign immigrants - nearly 1/3rd of the population) and religions (10-25% Shia and 1.5 million Christians). Actually, Poland is even more ethnically homogenous than it's neighbor Belarus - where Belorussians are around 83% of the population versus 96% of Poles in Poland.
You're arguing that the tiny amount of Jews, Muslims, Germans, Vietnamese, Koreans, Ukranians, etc. make Poland a diverse society. Well, the fact is these combined groups represent a tiny fraction of Poland. Yes, maybe the name of Santa Claus will differ from north to south, east to west, but the fact is the majority of them follow Wigilia traditions and have a distinctly Polish name for Santa. If Poland were as diverse as you claim, there'd
Poland is a very ethnically and religiously homogeneous country. It is not like Germany, Sweden, France, UK or even Czech Republic - and quite frankly most Poles want to keep it that way. That is one thing that at least most Poles can agree on - we want to keep Poland a Polish Roman Catholic country.
So no, most Poles do not want Muslims in their countries. They even negotiated with the EU about the whole migrant crisis and eventually agreed to let some Iraqis in - but Christian ones.
csmonitor.com/World/Europe/2016/0310/We-know-our-reality-Why-Poland-is-cool-on-the-EU-refugee-crisis
Even here, the people who wish to lend a helping hand only want to accept Christian Syrians and Iraqis. This shows how important even Christianity is in Poland's decision to take in migrants.
Again, why should Poland accept people it doesn't want? At least people are reaching out to Christian families, which I applaud them for as these groups are amongst the most persecuted in Syria and Iraq. Actually, Many Syriac Christians said that their lives were fine under Assad and claim that under his leadership generally all the different religious groups lived in peace. It wasn't until the Sunni majority started clamoring for greater representation that the situation went to crap.